The Journal reported executives at SpaceX worried Elon Musk was on drugs after an “unhinged” all-hands meeting in which he slurred and rambled.

  • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    234
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the way he’s always been and it’s only getting worse.

    Employees have always had to manage him not the other way around; a perpetual petulant toddler banging his hands on the table; ruining everything he touches with his Reverse-Midas-Touch so they keep him at bay.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      104
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is increasingly the characterization of so many rich and powerful people.

      Soooo weird…

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you have money, then in the business world you have intrinsic value.

        When you have enough, you reach the tipping point where it doesn’t just need to be the only thing you provide, but it outweighs others ways you hurt the business.

        The less your ideas are useful and the more money you hoard, the faster it changes.

        It can go quickly downhill when the CEOs wealth is tied to stock price.

        And ends disastrously when they go somewhere that workers aren’t used to them. Because the CEO was never told they used to be babysat just for their money, they legit believe they’re a genius

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s impressive then that the starship stack is stainless steel not carbon. Musk planned a giant carbon fibre rocket. The engineers he hired got him to change size and change material

      • Blackout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        You have to think who gets that wealthy and is like “Let’s go to work!” You have to be psychotic to have more wealth than you can ever spend and not go fuck off somewhere and enjoy it. I would never go back to a job even if I was running the place, I’d just do whatever I wanted to do for the rest of my life.

        • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          See, idk if I could do that the rest of my life. I’m dreading retirement, even though it’s a long way off, as I have no idea how I’ll handle it…
          I could do maybe a month of nothing then I start getting antsy and depressed. Working gives structure to my life, and while I really hate getting up and going to it, it’s better for me than the alternative…even when I don’t have to worry about money.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yea, but would you pretend to be a business genius while in actuality being the world’s biggest spoiled dork? Like Tommy Boy but without the charisma and infinitely more needy for a positive reception. I think, even as delusional as I am, you and I would recognize we’d likely need a different role.

            Musky boy gives us the Cyber Truck, and a dancing jackass in a leotard and helmet for a robot…

            • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              No, but I’m neither rich nor a narcissistic prick, just a regular asshole.
              Always thought Musk was a piece of shit, glad my initial thought is being proven correct.

          • elvith@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I feel you. On the other hand, you might find something different to pass/spend your time with. Maybe you return to your job. Maybe you start a new company, maybe you start to do arts and crafts, or…

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s a pretty sad revelation. We’ve been so beaten down that we can’t imagine being happy pursuing whatever we’d like to do day after day without “creating value.”

            And we only get this one go at life. One life to live and we’ve been so sapped of the entire concept of “living” that work is our life. How sad that is.

            It just seems crazy. I don’t know, it just feels so wrong to hear people think this way.

            • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ehhhh. I’m a Stone Mason working in conservation, my job is really satisfying and rewarding. I enjoy my work generally, and passing on the skills to the next generation is an extra bonus feel good. I wish I was able to structure my own life enough to not want to go to work if I was independently wealthy, but currently struggling with possibly adhd or autism spectrum stuff, and while I would love to be able to work on stuff for myself I need external structure…

              Yes, I know that last sentence was a bit fucky, I’m in bed and lazy, not changing it.

          • elvith@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I feel you. On the other hand, you might find something different to pass/spend your time with. Maybe you return to your job. Maybe you start a new company, maybe you start to do arts and crafts, or…

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I enjoy it, but I prefer calling him Terrence Howard because he’s a fake iron man who is going to be replaced.

          • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            Mr. “If one times one equals one that means that two is of no value because one times itself has no effect. One times one equals two because the square root of four is two, so what’s the square root of two? Should be one, but we’re told it’s two, and that cannot be.” Terryology Howard?

            Refuting thousands of years of knowledge and science and saying we’ve, ‘been doing math wrong this whole time’ takes a whole nutter level of nutter.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              See? He and Elon need to get together and compare science notes. Imagine the new Tesla/SpaceX Cyber Rocket Truck those two could come up with together!

  • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    11 months ago

    At SpaceX, where illicit drug use could jeopardize the billions of dollars of government contracts enjoyed by the defense contractor due to federal regulations, The Journal’s reports of Musk’s drug use put at risk nearly $1 trillion in assets held by investors, about 13,000 jobs, and the future of the US space program.

    And I thought Twitter was going to be his biggest fuck up.

    • derphurr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think Twitter was a fuck up. It’s likely he had $20B or something insane in cap gains (maybe from selling Tesla shares or other investments).

      He took Twitter private sold it on paper to same private shareholders, now can claim $17B or whatever it is in losses. Now he pays nothing in taxes, has one of the largest Internet mouthpieces he can use to sway elections, etc. The only people who took losses are banks he used to swing purchase and the twitter landlord he is refusing to pay.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, it single-handedly ruined everyone’s understanding of who he is and what he can do in the most humiliating ways imaginable. But if you want to spin it as a tax write off supermove, okay. It can be two things I guess.

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Really though, what’s the point of having “fuck you” money if you don’t tell people “I don’t care. Fuck you” every once in a while? (Or… daily)

        • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          I always thought of “fuck you” money as a statement being made up the chain. Saying “fuck you” to all the employees below him is not cool.

          • bitwaba@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            the point of having “fuck you” money is that you can say “fuck you” to anyone and it won’t impact you. If you would like to say it to the people up the chain, that’s fine. If you’d like say it to someone else, that’s fine too. Who gives a shit? You certainly don’t. You’ve got “fuck you” money.

  • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    11 months ago

    We can excuse the racism, the transphobia, and the antisemitism, but we draw the line at drugs!

    • EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      That can lose them their security clearance and government contracts, so kind of a big deal.

      The racism and transphobia and everything else can be ignored because it doesn’t affect their bottom line in the society we live in.

    • zbyte64
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oh, they’re probably okay with certain drugs, but slurring speech indicates he’s taking the wrong kind.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    with one executive describing the event to the outlet as “nonsensical,” “unhinged” and “cringeworthy.”

    This is different from normal?

    Also:

    SpaceX also began cracking down on illegal substances at the company by bringing in drug-sniffing dogs, sources told The Journal.

    How much do you want to bet those dogs are never allowed up in the executive suites?

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      11 months ago

      What kind of company has such a bad drug problem that they need to bring in dogs to find it? Absolutely ridiculous.

        • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          In normal corporate environments I’ve seen people abuse everything from codeine headache tablets to crystal meth.

          Not defending Edolf Twitler, I’m just saying it’s not unusual for these environments to be so toxic that people look for ways to manage.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t find the drug use abnormal so much as them bringing in drug sniffing dogs to catch it rather than dealing with it on an individual basis.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Probably less for actually finding drugs than for checking a tickbox on an insurance form for “taking measures to combat drugs” or something. It’s probably just Ricky from HR’s dobie-doodle mix.

      • elbucho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think it’s that they had such a rampant drug use problem. I think it’s just that they wanted to appease Uncle Sam so they could keep sucking on that taxpayer teat. Uncle Sam’s a bit of a stickler about such things, especially when it comes to people who build rocket ships.

    • Shadywack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well the smart money can only go inverse, and tripling down with a “I’ll see your bet and raise it 500%” that a drug dog absolutely will find a shit ton of drugs in the executive areas. I’d take out the largest loan I possibly could, then go to a loan shark and do a blood contract, and absolutely muster every possible cent I possibly could after whoring my own ass out, on THAT bet.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    11 months ago

    … Musk’s drug use, which includes LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, and ketamine, …

    Explains…soooo much. Still an asshole, though.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yea… You kinda’ have to be a real piece of shit to be on that many drugs and still be an asshole. Good ol’ musky.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean, with that kinda dough, you kinda run out of normal things to do.

        Drugs are probably the most normal thing he does.

        Which is why dumbasses pay millions to go see the wreck of the titanic and have pedo orgies in private islands.

    • jayrhacker@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, and sure he can pass a drug test if you consider:

      LSD: 12 hour wash-out time for a blood test
      Cocaine: 24 hour wash-out time for a blood test
      MDMA: 24-36 hour wash-out time for a blood test
      Ketamine: 24 hour wash-out time for a blood test, and it’s easy to get a prescription for off-label use to treat depression

      So basically, do all the drugs you want Friday night, by Monday morning you’ll be clean enough for a blood test.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s news sure but is anyone thinking it’s groundbreaking news that Elon musk might be on drugs most of the time?

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        He was on Rogan smoking a joint. Not that weed is a particularly harmful drug but I bet you would catch 0 other CEOs doing it so brazenly.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I mean he had a half a puff of a joint. Not that alcohol is a particularly harmful drug but I’m sure plenty of CEOs enjoy a beer from time to time without becoming full blown drug addicts.

      • gullible@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 months ago

        100% an upper or “microdosing” on a hallucinogen. Just a nibble of psilocybin every day before impregnating a secretary and after bed.

        This is entirely unrelated, aside from the stupidity of the subject, but I’m reminded of that fella who repeatedly injected mushrooms to try to get high. He sterilized the mushrooms by boiling, then blended, loaded into a hypo, and slowly plunged the mixture into his arm. He ended up with a complete systemic fungal infection but survived. I wish Musk would get creative with it.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    11 months ago

    The guy was a decent salesman, heavilly empowered by daddy’s money and connections, who had a bit of luck, even though he only had one kind of salesmanship technique - the Techbro Brew: heavy on selling “high-tech” and “innovation” as inherently good and always trumphing other considerations - and kept walking the grey legal area between lies, exageration and Fraud.

    However he seems to have started believing his own schtick that he’s a special golden boy whose farts smell of roses, and here we are now.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      Know this: having that amount of money is deeply not normal. None of us could do it. We’d save people. We’d build things that helped instead of giant toys. Billionaires are a type of sociopathy. And this guy’s got it bad.

      100% tax after 999 million. Full stop.

      • Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        “One tiny step for mankind and one giant leap for me personally” – Jason Alexander during a skit about piece of shit billionaires making dick shaped rockets going out into space.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly. Musk and Trump are the poster children for why you shouldn’t leave your kids everything if you’re wealthy. It’ll ruin their lives and the lives of their children.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not trying to defend excessive wealth, but Trump and Musk were both ruined by their fathers.

          The regular model for self aware billionaires is to keep your head down. How much do you know about the Johnson and Johnson heirs? Or the Walmart heirs? They know their necks will be on the chopping block is they’re well known and a revolution comes.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Musk spent a lot of money trying to teach people that that doesn’t work.

        He’s a billionaire because he owns the majority of Tesla and Tesla is very valuable. He has no taxable income unless he draws a salary or liquidates some of his Tesla shares

        He demonstrated it by liquidating some shares and getting a tax bill

        Billionaire spending money comes from a deal with a bank - the billionaire gets as much credit as they like, the bank is paid back by their estate upon death

    • Ibex0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      However he seems to have started believing his own schtick that he’s a special golden boy whose farts smell of roses, and here we are now.

      Yeah, that’s the problem. Honestly, a lot of people would do this. That’s why corporations are supposed to have checks and balances.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have a couple of acquaintances that are PayPal Mafia and what I’ve put together from them and anecdotes around the Valley is pretty much spot on what you’ve got here. He’s not special. Life just had a course that worked out for his douche ass.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d typically respond “aren’t they all?” But the MF has more money than God. I really don’t know what to make of him. I think he’s just a legitimate piece of shit incel king edge lord who lost the thread and doesn’t know he’s no longer just a troll. Maybe the daddy issues are so bad he cant see his own power. Why else act like this?

          • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            He grew up as a child of an emrald miner in South Africa under the aparthied regieme.

            Super rich kid in a historically notoriiously dehumanizing society.

            Its like perfect conditions for a narcisistic mental disorder.

            So im not really suprised by his bizzare conservative appeals against poor people, employees, regulators and the like.

            Comic books need villains too.

            • blazeknave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Nailed it. They always think they’re the victim hero saving us from ourselves. Who needs Kang and Doc Oc when you have jabronis like this guy and orangeman

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    11 months ago

    I will admit, him being on drugs did not occur to me as a possible explanation for his ‘taking tesla private’ tweet that torpeedoed his networth, but having been confronted by it now I am having a hard time not believing it.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      11 months ago

      Musk’s drug use, which includes LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, and ketamine, according to people familiar with the matter, is at the center of an extensive new report from The Journal that details how executives at several of the billionaire’s companies have struggled to manage his substance use and erratic behavior.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    11 months ago

    Companies perform drug checks for a reason. People who lead large organizations while regularly getting off on drugs are usually the biggest psychopaths around.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Don’t be silly. Drug testing is largely for worker’s comp. Think the insurance wants to pay out on an accident a fucked up employee got into? That has nothing to do with the employer.

        That’s why the vast majority of jobs coded as “clerical” do not require a test. Employers don’t want to pay for all that if they don’t have to.

        EDIT: Lemmings who know nothing of the employment field, but want to get righteously angry.

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            but thanks to decades of war on drugs propaganda, if you smoke a joint on the weekend you’re a bad and dangerous person and it’s not just acceptable but incumbent upon Real God-Fearing Americans©™® to hurt you however they can.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m sorry you’re eating downvotes but this is the absolute truth in a lot of cases. I put in 18 years at various restaurants, worked every position except manager. I’ve never needed a drug test to get a job, and every job I ever had in that industry people were definitely on drugs at work, but drug tests are mandatory after a workplace injury. The reason being they don’t actually care whether you’re high at work but they can use the fact that almost everyone in a restaurant is high in order to cut costs under the guise of “workplace safety”.

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              They don’t really cook in a lot of kitchens (chain ones anyway), it’s more like they’re microwaving it for you.

            • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              lol I worked at a place whose name rhymes with “Sad Tex” because they’re called Mad Mex where the cooks were literally hitting the bowl on the line and blowing it into the hoods

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          There are exceptions, though. For instance, anyone who works in any capacity in the aviation industry is legally required to be tested for drugs. That includes, for example, software engineers working on booking systems.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because there are no instances in history where forcing drug use had been weaponized at the international level. Man, sometimes it’s so easy to see how lemmy is close to the same dark web that spams drug adverts on matrix.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      11 months ago

      The higher up you go, the less likely it is that you’d be tested for drugs. We could empty board rooms if we insisted on drug testing at that level.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, but I’m not really arguing against that claim. The higher up you go, the more psychopaths you have as well. They can have all the drugs they want, the real work usually doesn’t depend on them, and psychopathy helps them make money if not contribute to society.

    • Shadywack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      10 downvotes on this comment, because they either mis clicked, they’re guilty of the same thing and the truth hurts, or they’re bootlicking scab motherfuckers.

      • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably because routine mandatory tests are bad, and the comment you replied to is an endorsement to it. It’s a gross violation of your constitutional rights under the 4th amendment. Also, why do you care to make assumptions on why people downvoted if you’re not even making an effort to broaden your views?

        https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/mandatory-drug-testing-public-sector-employees-constitutional

        • Shadywack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          No argument there, I’m not an advocate for drug testing against any intrinsic right as spelled out in the constitution, but there are many situations where companies need some type of enforcement against people who get high and go to work. Industries from utility, security, heavy manufacturing, or construction are just a few off the top of my head that the public trust demands those employees be “fit for duty” regardless of the public/private sector distinction due to the potential for fatal harm and/or destruction of property.

          The comment highlights the “rules for thee and not for me” mentality that C-suites have, to which I emphasize that while my viewpoint may seem narrow and extreme, it’s not due to a lack of broad views. I read that abstract and it’s a collection of concepts that does nothing to address some well understood concepts like “do you want a crane operator to be allowed to get high as a kite, jeopardizing lives?” as just one of many potential examples. If mandatory drug testing becomes ruled as illegal under the constitution, then we had damn well better amend it and figure this shit out…to which my and their point stands. I might even add that there are some ignorant assholes who apparently think it would just be great if we can all just be allowed to get high and kill people by accident. “It wasn’t a big deal, they just got some bad weed and the pilot killed himself and 200 people, what’s the big fucking deal?”

          • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            My source discussed your concerns, I think you did not read it.

            “Most courts have ruled that mandatory urinalysis, at least in the absence of probable cause or reasonable suspicion, is invalid as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. While some courts have concluded that government workers may have a diminished expectation of privacy in comparison with the public at large, other courts have required some quantum of individualized suspicion before drug testing can be conducted. States have attempted to uphold mandatory drug testing by arguing that government employees voluntarily consent to drug testing and voluntary consent does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Courts have not accepted this argument, however, finding that consent obtained under the threat of disciplinary action is coercive and thus unconstitutional. The real issue in mandatory drug testing involves balancing individual versus government interests. Most courts hold that, absent probable cause or reasonable suspicion, individual constitutional rights are not outweighed by governmental interests”

            • Shadywack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I did, actually, so let’s break it down:

              The strongest and most often cited argument for rejecting mandatory urinalysis is that such testing is an unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

              This is my issue right off the top, hence I bring up fit for duty requirements as a measure of preventing the loss of life and/or property. All reasonable suspicion and disciplinary issues arise after a major loss of life happens, and random UA testing has been viewed as a tool that functions preventatively in encouraging people not to show up under the influence of a substance, ie fit for duty.

              Had you displayed a modicum of understanding, you could see that point rather clearly, but it seems you like to use a stupid fucking red herring to detract from the point altogether. If it’s unconstitutional, then it ought to be amended, and while we’re at it, keep people accountable especially scumbag C-suite execs who are often making decisions that demonstrably lead to death and/or loss of property in various ways.

              • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Your reading comprehension is horrible, to say the least. Let me highlight the keywords for you so it’s easier.

                Most courts have ruled that mandatory urinalysis, at least in the absence of probable cause or reasonable suspicion, is invalid as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s only a violation of the 4th amendment for government employees, because only the government is bound by the 4th amendment. It’s still bad, but not because of the Constitution.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yes, I have. Have you?

              The Bill of Rights is all about limiting what the government is allowed to do. The text of that particular amendment is more vague about who it applies to, but let’s say for the sake of argument it is the law that prevents private employers from drug testing you without your consent. What it absolutely does not do is prevent your employer from firing you if you don’t consent to a search they want to do.

              • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Thankfully, smarter people than you and I decide what the law “applies to.” That’s what the courts have ruled, there can be no “consent” if it’s a condition for employment. There must be articulated suspicion.

        • zbyte64
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          In most cases I agree, with the exception of security clearances. That’s a give and take.

  • sirdorius@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Has there ever been an all-hands meeting where the CEO was not cringeworthy?

    I just assume it’s the minimum amount of yearly cringe you have to endure to stay employed.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      Until it starts hurting the other rich people- the investors. Eventually, Musk’s erratic behavior will have to be dealt with. He will never be anything but a multibillionaire, but he may not be CEO of his companies much longer at this rate.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        I heard aliens are real. That doesn’t exactly make it true. I doubt anyone with half a brain would have a full blown narcotics lab. At least, I’ve never heard of such a thing.

        • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Small batch boutique narcotics are a market just waiting to be milked in Silicon Valley.

          The purest of pure cocaine,…charge 10x the price of the best on the street.

          Any and all RC’s you’d ever want at your fingertips, etc etc.

          It’s just far too lucrative to think nobody is doing it.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Esp when you consider that most street drugs are laced with fentanyl/carfentanil.

            That almost guarantees the rich and famous have their own supply line.

            • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Esp when you consider that most street drugs are laced with fentanyl/carfentanil.

              I’ve been wondering how this could make sense as I’ve seen it claimed more and more often (feels very similar to the original war on drugs hysteria of the 80s and 90s), and I admit I haven’t looked too deeply, but it seems this is once again something being overblown due to the war on drugs.

              **But according to experts, nationwide drug studies, and the DEA’s own data, fentanyl contamination in non-opioid drug supplies is exceedingly rare, and largely centered on a specific, highly-vulnerable subset of users. **Critics say this is why the alarm raised by health officials and law enforcement is so concerning: Authorities stoking broad, misleading fears of fentanyl poisoning the non-opioid drug supply marks a damaging mission creep in the battle to stem the opioid crisis. As we’ve seen previously in the War on Drugs, narratives based on fear, not data, distract policy makers, public health advocates, and even first responders away from those who are at real risk.

              There is lots more info on the article linked, I just cherrypicked these two summary statements.

              So why the misleading claims about recreational coke and cannabis users being at such a high risk?

              On one hand, public health officials are doing what they’re meant to do: warn the public about health risks. On the other, the scale of the concern around fentanyl contaminating the entire US drug supply is a very familiar narrative in the War on Drugs: the belief that dealers are governed not by economics but by malice, that users are helpless addicts, and that drug eradication is the only solution to these problems.

              There’s far more detail in the article.

              https://www.vice.com/en/article/8xyzkp/the-truth-about-drug-dealers-lacing-cocaine-with-fentanyl

              • mob@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Obviously, you aren’t around drugs/drug users that often. Fent definitely is a real issue. A lot of my drug using friends(that are still alive) have conspiracies about why its in everything thats “not natural”(weed/shrooms/etc) for lack of better term… But it has started to show up in everything the last decade. Uppers/downers/psychs. Shits ridiculous

                But for anyone dabbling… Test strips are cheap. Use them. Mix the shit up good and test, even if you gotta break down the rock. Your friends and family dont want to find you dead covered in your own shit, piss and puke cause you were to lazy and cheap to test the shit.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                in non-opioid drug supplies

                That’s the qualifier. I have no idea why anyone would think marijuana would be contaminated with fentanyl.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Especially when there are (semi-) legalized dispensaries that have to go through certified laboratories. Hey, maybe that’s the solution.

                • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Fair, but that qualifier seems to be missing on billboards I see and even in this statement:

                  Esp when you consider that most street drugs are laced with fentanyl/carfentanil.

                  This gives the impression that cannabis, LSD, shrooms, etc etc are also at risk here.

        • EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I don’t know… Some of us common folk put a lot of what money we have into little hobby pot farms and greenhouses. If a billionaire just keeps throwing money at it, they can have a pretty nice setup of whatever drug manufacturing they want.

          You’re right, though. Never heard of it, but I won’t be surprised if we ever do.

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a world of difference between a micro and a macro dose. You don’t want to be anywhere near work with the latter.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        11 months ago

        The difference being, with one you get a light, pleasant, happy, drunk adjacent feeling. With the other, you’re sitting on the ground staring into the infinite void of nothingness, head lolled to one side, while your friends dab the back of your neck with a cool towel, hoping you don’t puke and asphyxiate on it.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’d argue that once you are feeling effects of the drug, you are no longer micro dosing.

          Micro dosing started out as a way to describe the maximum amount of substance you could take without feeling primary effects.

          • blazeknave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah the whole thing is dumb. Let me eat as many mushrooms as I can without tripping balls so I can kinda work and think I’m a genius. That was hard enough to balance with weed in the office. Real drugs?? Are you fucking kidding me?? Worst case, nothing happens. “Best case,” I lose my career??? No thanks man. Maybe I’ll use them to clear my head on a Friday alone and use the sober new perspective on Monday. During work with no upside??? Nobody has to drive during the day??? End old man rant

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I know that the rules for spravato (esketamine nasal spray, for depression) include no driving until after you’ve had a full night’s sleep.

                • blazeknave@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I didn’t drive regularly when I was younger and fucked around. But both then and sober old man now, I couldn’t fathom driving within 48 hours of any drugs. Even day after drinking, it’s not safe… if you’re drinking until last call, tomorrow isn’t tomorrow

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              But as your body builds up resistance you’re gonna have to increase the dose

              Also I imagine it’s like super sugar where people say “a little sweeter would be fine” and keep increasing the dose.

              • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                which is also why the doses need to stay micro; so the body doesn’t percieve it as something worth building resistance to.

              • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I definitely don’t want to be anywhere near Level 2 of a mushroom trip when I’m trying to actually function.

                Just keep it nice and low; measure out 3.14g and split it 4 ways; have a quarter piece of Pi and all that cheesy goodness or wotnot.

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s what the uppers are for.

          A micro dose of those, a macro dose of that, a pinch of meth a day keeps the voices away

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    11 months ago

    What would be scarier is if he wasn’t on drugs. Being on drugs means that there is a “normal state” for him to return to.

  • Rosco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    11 months ago

    Doesn’t he slur and ramble most of the time? I have never heard him make a sentence without stuttering.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If you watch the recent hour long interview where he told advertisers to fuck off, something seemed off about how he was talking then as well. I’ve watched my fair share of interviews and what not with him and even I thought something was up there.

        Not saying it’s drugs, but something is going on with him

        Edit: late edit after watching the all hands in question. This didn’t seem unusual for Elon and I didn’t get the same weird vibes I got during the interview I mentioned above. They did cut off the Q&A though so maybe something happened in that. Also the whole thing seemed unneeded. More of a public facing thing for people/media and not an all hands.

        • Huschke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          It think that he is slowly realizing the change in public perception of him and as a narcissist it’s getting to him. This could also explain the drug use too.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah, I’ve heard a psychologist say he’s showing clear signs of social media addiction (which is a pretty interesting/funny case when you’re also rich enough to buy the entire media company).

            I wouldn’t be surprised if he has other addiction going on at the same time. I mean who can tell this guy he has a problem? Who can say no to this guy, nobody has any authority over him…

              • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                But cops aren’t obligated to tell someone they have a problem. Apparently they aren’t obligated to do anything… (but that’s another rant). So there’s really nobody who can tell him to get his life together until a cop has reason to tell him he has the right to remain silent.