• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but has threads made an official statement like this yet on defederation rules? I’m an instance owner so I’m pretty sure I’d just reply back “lol”

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          I saw that mentioned on Mastodon, but honestly don’t care enough about Threads to actually look at their TOS. Seems likely though given they’re all about making it as bland and corporate friendly as possible.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            no of course not, it’s obvious, I was just surprised they already said the quiet part out loud, right now they seem to be all “buddy buddy” like we’re all stupid

            • Jimbo@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well there are apparently users here who want to see Threads content. I don’t know why you would want that, and here of all places…

              • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, I wish celebrities were jumping on other options rather than “ooo shiny new facebook”, they’re the only ones I would personally follow, but other than that if you want to follow me choose a platform that federates

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. Every instance will defederate from another if they are not acting in the way that they want. I don’t see why Threads would be any different.

        I guess the difference may be that the policies are much more restrictive rather than something like “is a frequent source of spam and hate speech” but there is always going to be a policy.

  • Paige (she/her)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Please use this official mascot for Calckey because it’s funnier Calckey mascot smoking a blunt

  • nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll believe it when I see it. The fact they allowed it the first step on the majority of instances(by user count) means when we cool off they will win the next step too.

    • Dodecahedron December@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Think of meta like reddit. Don’t want to be on facebook via federation? Just post jonny O or NSFW. Not like facebook is going to do anything but defederate from your instance. Kind of like how all instances work.

      • nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m surprised that nsfw spam is a viable trick. It makes sense, it just feels so weird to be viable. I’d expect it to mysteriously become against the rules as per my above post though. I’d prefer to talk about meta and their help towards genocide etc though. I’ll have to start making a list of their dirty deeds.

  • mawkler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the name of the fediverse services in the image, beside Mastodon and Pixelfed?