TL;DR: The common view on Meta’s Threads is that it will be either all good or all bad, leading to oversimplified and at the end contra productive propositions like the Fedipact. But in reality, it…

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/12225991

TL;DR: The common view on Meta’s Threads is that it will be either all good or all bad, leading to oversimplified and at the end contra productive propositions like the Fedipact. But in reality, it’s behaviour will most likely change dynamically over time, and therefore, to prevent us getting in a position, in which Threads can actually perform EEE on us, we need to adapt a dynamic strategy as well.

  • MimicJarEnglish
    6·
    11 months ago

    I would argue that most people don’t know about the Fediverse.

    The Fediverse has maybe a few million users, depending how you count it.

    Threads has 100s of million users. Even if only ½% of those move to the Fediverse, that’s still a huge win.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      2·
      11 months ago

      Threads has 100s of million users. Even if only ½% of those move to the Fediverse, that’s still a huge win.

      Gonna start paying mods, admins, and instance runners? That is huge amount of extra work that they would need to put in. Slow growth is sustainable, rapid growth is very risky to platform viability.