• logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    9 months ago

    Inflation is out of control. Housing is unaffordable. The healthcare system is broken. Everyone is drowning in student debt. Ecosystems are collapsing. We’re constantly on the brink of war.

    This is a better description of Trump’s presidency than Biden’s, especially right now when inflation is not out of control, and Biden has done everything he can to forgive student loans.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s how it always works. Republicans shit in the bed, but it’s only uncovered after a Democrat gets elected. Then they fix everything, only for the next republican to start the process over.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        9 months ago

        Didn’t Obama try to come up with a healthcare solution that was undermined by conservatives? Which Trump tried to neuter as hard as possible?

        Didn’t Biden try to forgive student loans, which conservatives kept stopping?

        I feel the “both sides are doing it” argument isn’t entirely true.

        • Jonna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re absolutely right that there IS a difference between the two parties.

          But Obama’s healthcare plan was a rebrand of a Heritage foundation (conservative) plan that had been enacted at the state level by Romney in Massachusetts, and the most progressive part (the Medicaid expansion) was a last minute compromise to make the plan CHEAPER because the majority of the plan is a tax payer subsidized government enforced insurance monopoly. It hasn’t ended medical bankruptcies and it doesn’t cover everyone.

          Biden is actually better than I expected, while he gave in to the antics of Sinema and Manchin a little too easily and he’s still drilling oil and gas, the “Inflation Reduction Act” is the best climate and infrastructure legislation we’ve had, just 20 years late and still too little. Meanwhile he lets the courts roll him on student loans, on reproductive rights, etc.

          So yeah, the Democrats are better than the Republicans but they still SUCK.

          Since Eugene McCarthy in the early 70s to Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition, and recently Bernie, working inside the Democrats has not worked. But obviously neither has working outside. We need to keep trying, and I wish I had a better answer. But we need to do better than the Democrats.

        • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          With respect, it looked like a “try” in many cases but consider his decades in politics and knowing likely outcomes of any given proposal. Then consider his best of the best, Ivy League-educated cabinet, advising him on every chess move. If you don’t look at both sides, you might find yourself in a disingenuous ruse.

          I tried but what could I do?
          How could I have known Joe Manshun would say no?
          We didn’t have a filibuster proof majority (which we could have eliminated with a simple rule change like we did with the debt ceiling- but oddly didn’t for infrastructure).
          Oh those legal challenges came out of left field and our best and brightest from Harvard never saw it coming.
          I co-authored the bankruptcy bill that exempted student debt when I was a Senator but now my intentions are different. Student debtors, I’m on your side now. Don’t you see?

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        Trump was literally on Twitter bullying the fed chair to not raise rates, threatening to fire him. The inflation situation is very uniquely his fault.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s not something that magically flips on or off… It’s a result of market pressures. Pressure takes time to move things like markets. Trump very early on elevated the pressure, and COVID made sure the average working person was never going to match it. That’s the inflation we’ve seen.

            Inflation happens constantly because rich fucking morons designed the economy to require it in order to open their own avenues and justify their own jobs.

              • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Not really. You keep trying to say negative things in response to positive news about “Biden’s economy”, type stuff. I was responding to you asking questions about inflation.

                While Biden does not have his hand on some magical economy wheel, to repeatedly bring up negative things in response to positive discussion absolutely comes across as partisan gaslighting.

                You are talking as if you are a partisan hack. I am talking as if I know things about the economy. We are not the same.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          And he bitched about the Fed under Obama for keeping interest rates low and claimed that the real unemployment rate was like 42%.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        Things got infinitely better for the rich under Reagan. Remember Ronald Reagan, the corporate, senile puppet who taxed grandmothers on Social Security while giving huge tax cuts to the wealthy and also opening the door to corporate raiding?

          • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            9 months ago

            Wait a second. You said none of these things got better in any of your recent memory of the Presidency, but you’re also too young to remember Clinton? In the U.S.? So you must be my age or a bit younger, within 8-10 years. I was taught a lot of this in school. Well as a route 66 overview here are a few paragraphs in brief.

            In that timeline our only presidents were Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump. Clinton ended in 2001 ending with a surplus and extremely low unemployment, a trend which would continue for 2-3 years - and then Bush after his 8 years with a terrible response to natural disasters and the war led us into an extreme recession and deficit. Again. Which led to Obama’s first term having to deal with a housing crisis, banks, and businesses all crashing and being bailed out.

            I was born in the latest of the millennials and I remember all this living through it, and was also taught about Clinton in school as well as Desert Storm and its effects so I am a little at a loss here. But I did graduate before Betsy Devoss was made secretary of education.

            By the time Obama was done, despite all the wars (or maybe because of…) and a couple of natural and biological disasters we were on a lowered trend of unemployment, housing was still an issue but slowly working down, the effects of the recession were finally beginning to fade. Some states were even generating surpluses due to the certain taxing and legalization of a certain something, though not all of it was being properly utilized due to how the laws were written (still widely true today).

            Then 2016 happened and we’re still recovering from the decisions made then on so many levels, from environmental protections and pollutant regulations, to literal repealing of women’s autonomy and right over their own body. For what, some COVID money, if you qualified? What a trade, a few thousand for taking multiple steps backwards.

            And now we’re nearing the end of 3 years in on Biden. Remember how it took 2-3 years of lingering upward trend from Clinton to Bush? And how it took 2-3 years of recovery from Bush to Obama? That’s a common historical trend among pretty much all transitioning Presidencies where the lingering effects of the previous administration is seen and felt during the current one. It’s why generally 2 term (8 year) Presidents are able to be so effective, because unless there’s a political gridlock the 2nd term is generally able to make lots of headway on the campaign policy they ran on.

            Trump managed his bout so poorly that even without COVID in Jan-March of 2020 his “2-3 year trend” from Obama was run into the ground in a very young 2 years due to the sheer number of aforementioned policy decisions (the removal of the EPA, the removal of the CDC branches, the removal of pollution regulations on corporations…).

            Now here we are again, today, at the end of Trump’s 2-3 year trend. Still seeing the effects from COVID with businesses just barely beginning to show signs of recovering. Homelessness is still a massive issue with finally some minor strides being made in some areas but hardly overall. More than anything right now is the divide between political ideologies, if you can call human rights and health political. Double that divide due to the conflict outside of the U.S.

            I would pay attention to this next year. And maybe get involved in local politics to find people passionate about making change within your community, it often gives you a wider sense of what people have felt. You’d also be surprised by the range of people you meet.

            It’s also always fun to take some classes on government and political science, it can really highlight a lot of the systemic issues and historical trends, such as how conflicts between the police and black communities and queer communities from the 70’s and 80’s are still happening today. From the murderer George Zimmerman who shot and killed a young man Trayvon Martin to over a decade later the murderer Derek Chauvin who killed a man George Floyd by suffocating him for nearly 9 minutes while pinned to the ground. Back to 40 years ago when so many of the same stories happened in New York and so many other states, like Stonewall and the Miami Riot.

            The reason I went in on all this is because despite many shortcomings, the answer is a clear, definitive, one side consistently props up all people and the other tears it away. Despite some states having their own positions (say, California or Texas) the effects are still strikingly visible, in these last 8 years it’s been a gaping tear and we have been living through the open wound. There are so many things to learn about but it’s important to remember that the most effective changes are made locally by being present in your community and by staying vigilant by making sure history repeats itself with positive reinforcements and not negative ones.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      People unfortunately still have the perception that inflation is out of control despite it being under 3%.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    9 months ago

    The real problem is pronouns. We have to get rid of them. Nothing but proper nouns.

    “George likes proper nouns in George’s sentences.”

        • zbyte64
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          Nah, we just need kids to play war video games as training data for AI killing machines. Congress might pitch it as an AI jobs program.

          • quams69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Nah, drone pilot systems don’t have the type of visceral feedback a game does. How are these kids going to bomb people without a hitmarker, hitreg sound, scoreboard, killstreak rewards or an exp system? They can’t even customize their predator drones!

            Worst game ever, 1/10

  • thefluffiest@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course those genitals are important! If they don’t do that, then their god will not magically fix said problems. They themselves are of course powerless to do anything about it. Far too busy lining their and their donors pockets!

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    If conservatives want to be a part of the solution, they can be. But they aren’t.

    Newt Gingrich was the last Republican to create policy and even he is problematic.

  • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    The older I get the more apt this aphorism becomes:

    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    They’ve missed the entire point. It’s about manufacturing outrage to distract from things people should really care about.

        • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s unimportant for literally everyone but them until puberty

          And from that point on its their and their doctors problem

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  33
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So the one percent of people who are trans are going to fuck up medical statistics? That’s your pathetic excuse for these comments? The most generous one can possibly be with you here is to say that’s a huge stretch. It’s certainly a weird thing to focus on.

                • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  24
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Do you think that they don’t have your whole medical history? Like if they’re looking for a Y-chromosome associated cancer they’ll just pull up my surgical and prescription history and see “oh yeah that’s related” or they’ll order a karyotyping to ensure they’re correct because XY-AFAB people and XX-AMAB people aren’t *that^ rare of an intersex condition, especially as chimerism is downright common.

                  However what’s much more common is hormonally associated phenomena that aren’t extremely well known to be such. The most famous example is that after not very long on hormones trans people’s heart attack symptoms change to our hormonal sex’s. For a long time it was so rarely known amongst emergency room professionals that trans people were more likely to die of a heart attack.

                  But beyond this, that’s medical professionals and it’s a complicated discussion that’s currently happening in both the medical and trans communities by those who are affected most by it and those who are experts on these topics. What was clearly meant by this post was not that, but rather that people should feel 100% certain as to what is between the legs of every acquaintance and stranger they meet and that the government needs to know what each and every individual’s birth sex is.

                • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So adjust the data. That’s what science is. It’s always changing as we learn more about ourselves and our universe. Look, I’m really sorry that statistical conclusions drawn from inaccurate data aren’t helpful, but that’s true whether trans people exist or not.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do I think it’s important for a medical doctor? Sure. Do I think it’s important for you to know? No. Why would it be?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m just curious, has any strangers’ genitalia impacted you in any way that actually matters? And no sports don’t count no one gives a shit about the .1% of athletes who are trans and how much of an AdVaNtAgE they have.

      From where I’m sitting, people just need to shut the hell up about other people’s lives. They impact you in no way. Yet you impact their lives, taking their rights away and driving them to suicide. These types of comments literally contribute to suicide. Your comment could be the last straw for someone reading it, and they could choose to end their life because of you. And you sleep at night fine I’m sure. You should care about what that says about you.

      Other people have hard lives and you don’t need to make them harder. Deal with your own shit. Let others do their best to deal with theirs.

        • violetraven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 months ago

          Think about women’s sports!
          Which women’s sports do you play or watch ?

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 months ago

          No one truly cares about how a handful of trans athletes MaKe ThE gAmE uNfAiR. They like excuses to be cruel. You for example. Perfect evidence of that is that I point out the suicide rate and that the constant hate trans people are exposed to often causes them to commit suicide. You could not possibly give less of a fuck that you could be contributing to that. No self reflection whatsoever, even when a mirror is forced into your face. Brushed it away like it was absolutely not worth considering for a moment. You’re trash. You’re a liar. You’re grabbing onto a bullshit justification to spread hate.

        • eupraxia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I fight people and have opinions! Main thing right now being HEMA, mostly blunted axe + shield sparring. It’s mixed-gender and my experience is that men and women are pretty competitive with each other. I’ve also fenced competitively, which has male and female divisions but men and women practice against each other all the time. Across both sports, height is far, far more important than sex. Like if you’re 5’10", you inherently have an advantage in reaching your 5’6" opponent, whether they’re male or female. People focus on sex like it’s sufficient to equalize genetic advantages and “level the playing field” but think of the difference between the shortest man you know and the tallest man you know. Would you honestly say they’re on an even playing field in every sport because of their sex classification?

          It really depends a lot on the sport, hormones and time do a lot more than you’d think, and male/female divisions aren’t a level playing field to begin with in many sports. Also sure, there is a reasonable discussion to have at a professional level, but in most sports at anything less than the most elite level it’s such a non issue. Anyone pushing to police it in kids’ sports via genital inspection has lost their minds.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This comment feels like it’s from 2017 or something. If you’ve spent any amount of time on social media in the last few years, you know damn well how this comment would be responded to.

      If trans athletes are causing a serious, quantifiable disruption in competitive sports, to the point you can direct me to multiple bodies of evidence that clearly show a trend of cis athletes being overshadowed, then, and only then will I agree there is a problem.

      But there isn’t.

      There was no reason to impose restrictions on trans athletes before there is any data to suggest they were a problem. They only reason is prejudice.

      And the same goes for trans people in gendered bathrooms or any of the other shit people come up with as hypothetical problems for pearl clutching. You can imagine all kinds of ways gender could have “environmental” impacts. “Could” is the key word. We’re not going to operate on “could”. I want “is”.

      Show me the trends. Show me the data. Show me where it’s a quantifiable problem first, then we’ll talk.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      How the fuck does that make it any business of anyone other than your motherfucking doctor, and even then, significantly less often than you’ve convinced yourself of? (seriously - if your GP keeps asking you about your genitals every time you go in to see them, you should report them and find a new one, E: never mind them even knowing your chromosomic or genetic or even hormonal make up)

      You’re just a wilfully ignorant transphobe trying to pretend they aren’t one.

      But you are.

      And if that bothers you - you can just stop being one! I guarantee its easier than being a miserable hateful little bigot, no need for all that mental gymnastics, for starters…

      Otherwise - fuck off back up your own ass…

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If you were born a male with certain genetic factors, and you change your gender to female later in life, it is very important to know that you were born male with factors X Y Z and not female. It’s not a tough concept.

          No, it isn’t a tough concept, you’re just a bigot. ¯\(ツ)

          I noticed that I edited my reply just as you posted this, so I’ll add this here because you made the exact leap I knew you would - does your doctor know your chromosomes? DNA? Have you ever even had your hormones tested? The answer is almost certainly “no”, because most people don’t, because those things are hardly ever relevant, and if they are, it isn’t because someone is trans (E: in most cases, anyway).

          No matter how many ridiculous leaps you make, and how many times you swear you don’t care about gender at birth or whatever:
          You
          Are
          A
          Transphobe

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            No one gets tested for it because it’s very rare for it to not match up with your assigned sex at birth. Why spend hundreds of dollars on a test when you can just ask someone and get things right over 90% of the time? In recent years, doctors have always asked for both gender identity and assigned sex at birth, presumably because both are medically relevant.

            But the OP is clearly not about medical data for healthcare purposes.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              it is false to say the disease affected an XX-person.

              Give one example of anything like this ever happening.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              “I went into a trans friendly post with my transphobic talking points and people were rude to me! I am very upset about this and there is no way I could have seen this coming or prevented it!”

    • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re totally right. But the meme is probably referencing the fact that Republicans seem to care a lot about sex and gender when it comes to kids sports, or sports in general. That comes off worse considering Republican states are banning transgender treatment, or allowing conversion therapy. Seems like they really don’t like the LGBT community and try to hide it behind “health” related or “sports equality” related reasons.

        • kase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          9 months ago

          create a division that’s biological females only.

          As a trans man, I see this as an absolute win. /s

          I’m just making a pedantic joke btw. I’m assuming you’re talking about cis women.

              • Harvey656@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                9 months ago

                You keep saying that but never giving a fucking logical reason. Reading your schizophrenic replies is getting old.

                Explain, why it’s fucking important. Saying its important doesn’t make it so.

              • Nikki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                wanting to probe my genitals while not being my doctor is transphobic, that is the only person who would EVER have to see my genitals. anything more is a sign of a serious issue, words cannot describe the discomfort that would cause me, and im a grown adult.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            If they were talking about that set it would be useful to specify that set. But of course that would mean using icky terms like “cis” instead of denying the humanity and even biological existence of trans people. Can’t be having that, now.

          • violetraven
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            The women’s sports that they care so highly about at this time for some reason. Next they’ll probably talk about some hypothetical niece that plays sports and “whatever will she do” in sports with the trans

            • Perfide@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              9 months ago

              If there’s no genetic advantage for men, why did Chess have separate divisions?

              The ACTUAL answer is misogyny. Chess was(and still is tbh) a very misogynistic “sport” back in the day, and many male professional chess players refused to play against women, and the ones that did play against them were often crude. To try and get more women interested in chess, women only divisions were created. It has literally nothing to do with genetic advantages.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              9 months ago

              I can’t speak for chess, but in gaming where there’s similarly no sex advantage, female gamers are rarely seen at the higher levels because the environment is very hostile towards them. Creating a separate women’s league would alleviate this to some degree and encourage more women to actually try to reach for the top.

        • Rambomst@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You are missing the fact that this issue is so unimportant and that even talking about it when everything else is on fire is… well… kind of moronic tbh.

            • howrar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              There may be environmental issues which are dependent on your gender at birth.

              Can you elaborate on what you mean by this and why it’s important? I don’t understand how your gender at birth affects the environment in any way that matters.

                • howrar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I still don’t see how that’s relevant to the environment. I’m guessing you just misspoke there.

                  Good science will consider your assigned sex at birth for these stats where relevant. No one is disputing the value of having that information and no one has problems with it because this data is all anonymized. The problem that the OP is referring to is when this data is collected without anonymization and used to bring harm to specific people based on their medical records. There’s no reason for anyone besides your doctor to have access to your medical records. Scientific studies require explicit consent to get that data.

            • SomeSphinx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              9 months ago

              “means more” isn’t a factual statement, it’s a value judgement and some people value being the best version of themselves more than they value leading a miserable existence because of their genetics. Environmental issues are also just that: results of the environment rather than innate expression of X or Y chromosomes. The point the OP post is making is that instead of focusing on economic policies, global warming, and wars, politicians are more focused on who decides they’d be happier as a man/woman/non binary person. It’s a complete waste of time for everyone BUT doctors and researchers since we shouldn’t be judging or limiting what people can do based on what genitals they were born with, and instead be focusing on how to fix massive, glaring, and disastrous issues such as the ones described in the post.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      You need to get out of your small town you’ve never left and meet some people who are more educated who can help you.

    • CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      But there’s a reason why your sex or gender at birth is important. How your body works genetically and how you feel are two different things. The conditions which led to your genetics may be a larger environmental issue and need to be accounted for.

      Incredible how often when a transphobe is asked to explain these ‘important reasons’ it literally relates to games. I’m taking about grown adults, so deeply concerned about games with balls that checking whether children who play have balls is now a fixation.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      But there’s a reason why your sex or gender at birth is important.

      Sure, ok.

      The point of this meme is: is it really more important than all of those issues listed? Is having a slightly skewed dataset (which will not happen because people that ACTUALLY need to, know that) more important than healthcare itself being a complete disaster?

  • zbyte64
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Meh. The illusion starts to fade at the mention of student debt and totally broken with the word “ecosystems”. Need to dial up the conservative and make it about how jobs don’t pay enough or how much you have to run the AC now days. Also, not sure about the war part being bad in a conservative view, rather it’s that we don’t really win wars anymore.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      When it’s a conservative president: We are protecting our country from brown people.

      When it’s a democratic president: we are wasting funds attacking no-name countries instead of making gas cheaper

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Image Transcription: Social Media


    Low Quality Facts, @lowqualityfacts…

    For the sake of empathy, I ask you all to take a second to consider things from the perspective of Conservatives:

    Inflation is out of control. Housing is unaffordable. The healthcare system is broken. Everyone is drowning in student debt. Ecosystems are collapsing. We’re constantly on the brink of war.

    So naturally, one would ask, how can we even hope to solve these daunting and complex issues if we do not have detailed information on the genitals of every American citizen?

    • Nikki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 months ago

      hey as a trans person, respectfully, fuck off. we aren’t gonna win our rights by “spreading kindness”, we win them by pushing for laws protecting us. until i am not virtually banned in half of the states in my country, i am not appeasing bigoted assholes just to meet halfway on my human rights

      the revolution will be won in thigh highs

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you weren’t taught, you won’t know.

      https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/transgender-woman-from-nelson-house-attacked-1.3951040

      “He started making fun of [a] friend for hanging out with me, saying, ‘Oh I didn’t know you were gay, I didn’t know you were a fag’,” she said.

      As an activist for the LGBT community, Spence spoke up for herself and the man she was talking with.

      Spence says it escalated quickly and the man punched her in the face. So, Spence says she punched him back and suddenly other people descended on her.

      “One thing led to another and I was on the ground and the three of them were kicking me in the face,” she said.

      “They were saying things like, ‘Faggot, tranny, bitch.’ Really, really mean things, like misogynistic things.”

      While she was being attacked, Spence said she wasn’t sure she was going to make it out alive. While the beating felt like forever, her friends later told her it lasted about three minutes.

      Was the attacker in this story “not taught” it’s not acceptable to assault people? Should the trans person have been calmly teaching him “this is unacceptable” as she was getting punched in the face?

      If people need to be taught “punching people in the face is wrong” then they need to be locked up until they learn that, it’s not the roll of the general public.

    • eupraxia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I have feelings about this, hopefully my venting can explain why this expectation pisses people off. Explaining this shit can be exhausting and just existing as someone who’s trans leads to deeply probing questions both about trans people at large and also you specifically. Depending on context, they can be harmless or even supportive in intent. But too often they lead to more icky questioning, disparaging remarks, threats, abandonment, and… so on. Even in harmless cases it’s fucking traumatic. I do have some cis friends who ask me completely appropriate questions, but I trust them because they’re respectful of my boundaries. Most aren’t.

      yes, taking the time to level with people, educate, etc is a good ideal, but speaking from experience it’s not something everyone can be expected to do right off the bat. The consequences of attempting to do so and receiving abuse in return can be too close to deep psychological wounds that require time to heal.

      do consider there’s less of us in general too. and explaining parts of the trans experience take walls of text like this one lol. In an ocean of bullshit, we can only do so much to bail ourselves out. We need help, or at the least, we need some baseline levels of empathy and respect from the people we’re trying to educate. Or at the absolute least try not to blame us when we’re grumpy or skittish about it.

  • DuckOverload@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Consider the identitarian left. The world is on fire. Nuclear holocaust looms over us. Mass extinction. Runaway AI is imminent. We really need to focus on upending the apple cart of sexual identity and relations right now.

    • flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes. There’s never a reason to stop pushing for more freedom. Happy, educated people make a better society. Keeping people who are different form you silent and miserable so you don’t have to have your feelings hurt by being reminded not everyone is like you doesn’t make the world a better place, it just gives more power to the people who are pushing all of those bad things you mentioned onto us.

      • DuckOverload@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No. Fixating on radical issues and demanding complete obedience alienates moderates. Anyone who believes in national borders or some importance of biological sex is unwelcome in many Left circles. The only reason The Right has any traction right now is people who are fed up with radical wokeism. I’m a moderate liberal, and I’m just tired of fighting over trendy fringe issues when we need to focus on existential problems.