Hey all! My team at work is struggling with growing pains of getting into a formalized review process, so I was wondering if any of you guys have some things to live or die by in your code reviews. How much of it is manual, or how much is just static code analysis + style guide stuff, etc?
We have a pipeline (realised on Jenkins with jenkinfiles) that is triggered by changes on a Branch a PR was made for. Another pipeline then is responsible for providing the Application for QA testing.