CDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前Your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1145
arrow-up1145imageYour thoughts?sh.itjust.worksCDRMITTENS@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 年前message-square22fedilink
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 年前deleted by creator
minus-squaremnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 年前Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-21 年前deleted by creator
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 年前I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
minus-squarecorrupts_absolutely@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 年前deleted by creator
minus-squareantonlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Submarines would also outperform tanks in space. Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.
deleted by creator
Isn’t urban combat the environment where tanks are the most poorly suited?
deleted by creator
I’ve heard that submarines win vs tanks in all engagements at 120 meter below sea
deleted by creator
Submarines would also outperform tanks in space.
Randall Moore (xkcd author) wants to remind everyone turning the missiles around for maneuvering to remove the warheads. Can’t link the xkcd because it’s in a physical book.