Please don’t say neither (that’s not an option)

      • Bahalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So much time and money saved, as well as head space not needing to be concerned about hair and styling.

  • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Basically 100% of men would rather be bald. I would guess that for women the percent would be somewhat lower, but still a large majority, but that’s just a guess, I’d be interested to hear what women think

    • AdaA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, for some it’s not…

    • Lafari@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very good point. Are you also aromantic, if that’s okay to ask? That is, some people are asexual but still enjoy engaging in romance just without the sexual stuff. Forgive me if I said this wrong

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mind romance as long as it’s not too imposing. I actually don’t mind physical expression either, I just don’t get anything out of it.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Comparison is the thief of joy, eh ?

    Both are alive.

    Bald can be explained as “too much testosterone my hair was scared of my masculinity”. But you need to mop up sweat constantly.

    Losing sexual function can be tough but also freeing of binds that create lots of social disarray.

    • Lafari@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would you cut off and eat your own dick for 150 billion dollars? (This would make you the 4th richest person in the world)

    • Lafari@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You may consider a transplant then, and if no drugs, then you may need to get another one later down the track as well, possibly repeatedly.

  • forty2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bald up top, and a big fuck-off uncontrollable 70s afro down below.

    Neatly trimmed to look exactly like an elephant shaped chia pet. Orgasms ruined because the beauty and awe THIS burning bush elicits, but I don’t care because it’s been classified as one of the natural wonders of the world

  • talizorah@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not getting laid anyways, and already have to wear a hat all the time. Give me my hair back.

  • Thelsim@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Please don’t say neither (that’s not an option)

    Both?

    Edit:
    Ok, in all semi-seriousness, I like my hair and like to keep it. Sex is still fun without an orgasm.
    I’m more of a giver than a taker anyway :)

    • Lafari@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Agreed on dut tho (semi, finasteride might be fine enough with lower risk of side effects)

    • Lafari@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s PFS? Google search showed multiple possibilities and I can’t see how any are related to this