The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there is no easy way to own what you buy, then piracy becomes a moral obligation to preserve culture for future generations.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      You want something, but you don’t want to pay the cost (either monetarily or because they have made it too hard) and so you take take it. Fuck these assholes companies who try to milk people for every last penny, so I have no moral qualms with piracy, I do it myself.

      But, fuck, can we stop trying to paint it as some noble thing? Effectively zero pirates are doing it to perseve culture, instead it’s fulfilling personal desire.

      This is chaotic neutral at best, not neutral good.

      • Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there’s an exception to be made in your argument for abandonware. There are classic arcade games that wouldn,'t exist any more but are widely available due to MAME support.

      • TunaLobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Internet archive, and a chunk of r/datahoarders, is built for that purpose. Just as people have saved old paintings (aka media) it’s also good for us to save significant pieces of our current culture. Old VHS tapes and CDs are already disappearing. Sometimes finding something is just a little bit more difficult and it’s only going to get worse.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I pirated plenty when I was young and poor, I’m pretty sure that helped form a desire for that sort of stuff which I pay for now.

        I bet if I had abstained when I couldn’t afford it, I wouldn’t have spent the money on all the content I buy now

        I believe the bulk of pirates are people who wouldn’t have bought the content if they had to pay for it

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        People who are doing porting work to make Windows-entwined Ubisoft games available on Linux are helping to preserve media for the future. People booting up Limewire are doing nothing.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a Spotify subscription that I still pay, but built a library full of FLACs on the side specifically because I got fed up with “right holders” taking songs in and out of my playlists and having the right to deny me access forever.

        It literally would be cheaper and easier for me to just use Spotify.

    • flamehenry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you pay to own a movie then yes, you should be allowed to make copies of it and keep it forever, even if the seller goes bankrupt in future. You are paying to own the movie.

      If you subscribe to Netflix you are not paying to own the content, you are paying for access to their content. Therefore you cannot legally download a movie from Netflix and keep a copy forever.

      However, if Netflix don’t make it possible to buy their unique content for permanent ownership, then piracy is the inevitable result and they should address that.

      But let’s be honest here, none of you are intending to buy anything.

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I spend way more money on streaming services than I ever spent buying DVDs or CDs.

        To say that “I don’t intend to buy anything” is a BS accusation. You have no clue about another persons motives.