• lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it has to be good (to attract modders). I think it has to be inspiring. And that it most certainly isn’t.

      • greedytacothief@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I didn’t particularly enjoy base fallout 4, but I could see a lot of potential there. It felt like “if only I could change these things, then it will be good”.

        • Graphine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why I can still play Fallout 4 heavily modded and have a lot of fun. Because the core gameplay is really good. It just needed more quest variety and RPG elements.

          Starfield is wrong on a fundamental level. Exploration is a HUGE problem in Starfield and frankly with how they implemented it there’s not much you can do to fix it. However, land rovers would be a great step.

        • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Modding FO4 is a must, and honestly adding in lighting fixes and better bullet acoustics changes the game so much with those two things. It needs a lot more but I’ve always felt those mods are so needed to make it engaging on a vanilla level.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re still up against the limitations of the engine. There’s no way for example to mod in interstellar flight because the engine just can’t support environments like that.