• irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Suburbs and diffuse urban centers connected by highways are a consequence of cars, not the other way around. The US could have instead opted for public transport and densely packed services so a full shopping trip doesn’t take you all the way around the state. Here in the UK I can just walk into town and all the things you need are an easy walk from each other,

        • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          People are always going to adjust their risk upwards as technology gets safer. Even if all cars were self-driving and perfect, some pedestrian will push the bounds of physics, stepping out with no time to stop.

          These drivers aren’t going to sleep or Tiktoking in the first 30 minutes. They are being lulled into complacency by a tech that generally does a good job, and they have been told by marketing that we are so close to FSD.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Isn’t every technology a convenience technology?

          We weren’t making fires or using levers to inconvenience ourselves.

        • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I live in American suburbia and have far more miles on my bike than a car. And yes I have kids too. Yes the zoning sucks, but also Americans are just more lazy.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      you have to compare it with human shampoo drivers to have this number mean anything

    • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your statement only works if you’re also accounting for accidents prevented by lane assist technology. It’s also worth factoring in cases where these technologies were able to make an accident less severe.