• TechyDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think you’re misreading what I wrote. I was saying that the best case scenario of a second Trump term is that he continues his habit of getting in his own way and fails to institute a dictatorship. But even then, he’d do so much damage that it would only be a matter of time before the next wanna be dictator used the doors that Trump opened to finish the job.

    When even the best case scenario is “democracy is on life support,” we’ve got to do everything possible to stop Trump’s second term.

    Of course, what I didn’t mention in my original comment - and what likely tips the scales in what will happen - is not what Trump would do, but what others would do. When Trump won, I don’t think the right was prepared for the amount of power Trump was going to let them wield.

    They likely thought he would lose or would be a “typical Republican” up to that point - willing to bend the Constitution a bit but not outright shred it. By the time, they realized what they could do, they had no time to get plans together and people in place. The midterms had already occurred and Democrats controlled Congress.

    Now, though, they have Project 2025. They are organized and know exactly what they need to do to fatally wound democracy. Would Trump get in their way and (accidentally) stop them from achieving their goal? It’s possible, but I’m not willing to risk our democracy on that bet.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you know about Project 2025, but you’re still questioning whether or not they’d go through with it?

      Assume they will.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am morbidly curious just how bad project 2025 could go. Imagine entire economic collapse as the biggest employer in the US and biggest creditor on earth doesn’t have the staff to pay bills. Just a room full of heritage foundation pundits asking each other who knows what the password is for the Federal Reserve or Treasury. Because they fired everyone there for being too woke.

        • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pretty sure we’ve seen a preview of how it will look. They’ve been using that playbook pretty consistently.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            We can see a few examples. Kissinger for example would mess with the battle plans for Cambodia and we know that about 40% of the fatalities there were children, that it had o impact on Vietcong forces, ended between 150k-300K lives, creates 2.5 million refugees, and led to the bloodiest dictatorship in history. So here is an example of a pundit being appointed to run something where we can measure the outcome.

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a bitter irony in the face of the system collapsing not because the masses rose up and fought for a better future, but because those seeking to enslave humanity finally got everything they thought they wanted…

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I do it at work all the time. The moment someone starts giving me advice on how to do things I put them in-charge of it. Oh boy does the tune change fast and sometimes unexpectedly they do an awesome job. They sit there all day with their journalism degrees spewing out hateful shit for clicks and think that qualifies them to run things, well let’s let them run things. Let their legacy be getting exactly what they want and demonstrating how little they know.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I did actually misread a bit of what you wrote initially. I originally took your comment as you saying that you thought it was unlikely he could stop stepping on his own dick long enough to actually institute tin-pot authoritarianism. After re-reading both your comments I do believe you understand the threat that we are facing. So, forgive me there for misunderstanding your position.

      However, the part that scares me the most is the fact that all these legal proceedings are going to turn him into a cornered animal. Every vindictive, vitriolic, nihilistic, violent part of him is going to be ratcheted up to a truly unhinged level that I believe will fracture his personality. Once he is made to feel vulnerable he will lash out at everything and everyone that made him have to go through one fucking second of cognitive dissonance.

      The most dangerous people are the ones who are capable of being truly dishonest with themselves.