• AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    10 months ago

    All Abrahamic religions are very conservative. Hardcore Muslims share more values with hardcore Christians than with progressive liberals.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Who are they going to vote for in what is effectively a two-party system, the Republicans with a sizeable group of Christo-fascists?

    They’ll get even worse than ignored, they’ll be targeted.

        • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          Works both ways. Trump, if he’s not the nominee, will be splitting the other side too.

          There is no better year to get ranked voting than going 3rd party while both primaries split their votes.

          The MIC needs you to think it’s impossible or a waste of energy.

          • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Works both ways. Trump, if he’s not the nominee, will be splitting the other side too.

            It does not work like this.

            • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              Do you genuinely think Trump loses primaries and just bows out and doesn’t go 3rd party?.. I don’t understand your take.

              • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                So when you say “3rd party 2024” you’re suggesting voting for Donnie?

                Now I don’t understand your take.

                • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Works both ways. Trump, if he’s not the nominee, will be splitting the other side too.

                  There is no better year to get ranked voting than going 3rd party while both primaries split their votes.

                  The MIC needs you to think it’s impossible or a waste of energy.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ever wonder why Steve Bannon is working so hard to recruit 3rd party candidates?

      • Jaysyn@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Tell me you don’t understand math & game theory without telling me you don’t understand math & game theory.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Tell me you don’t understand the trolley problem without telling me you don’t understand game theory.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can’t happen until you change the legislatures to 5 member proportional districts and the single-seat offices to something like approval voting (or any other voting system where it’s safe to give your favorite maximum support).

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Former NYC Mayor Ed Koch had a good line. "If you agree with me 51% of the time, you should vote for me. If you agree with me 100% of the time, talk to a doctor.’

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 months ago

      reparations for slavery, strengthening the right to vote and making it easier to access polls, outlawing the death penalty, abolishing prisons, removing the clause in the 13th amendment that allows for legal slavery, abolishing the police or at the very least force them to have oversight, banning AI for use in law enforcement, etc.

      • Grebes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        10 months ago

        Reparations seems like a nonstarter but the rest of these are happening, to various degrees, at the state level in blue states

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think reparations are possible, we have to organize and do more than just voting to make it happen though.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I imagine the hardest part would be determining who was harmed by slavery given that not everyone has records of it. I think it would be nice to do to put that shameful chapter of history behind us. Whatever dollar amount we come up with probably wouldn’t be sufficient for the generational wealth destroyed, but it would be an attempt at doing better and very symbolic.

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I don’t think reparations would work as direct cash payments, I think they would work best as investments into black communities. Your reasoning is exactly why I support reparations though. We cannot fix the harm, but we can try to make it right.

              • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Porque no las dos? Most folks who’ve looked into it have concluded that it will take direct cash payment as well as community investment and multiple other simultaneous efforts to fully catch the black community up to their white counterparts in terms of opportunities and generational wealth they’ve been denied access to, and to work against the culture of racism that made all that denial possible in the first place.

                • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I think when most Americans think of reparations, they think of direct payments and no other remedies, so they get upset about it for all manners of reasons. When discussing reparations, it’s far easier to get people on board when you don’t talk about direct payments. Payments are part of the solution, but they won’t solve the problem. If we had to pick a single option, focusing on communities would have the strongest individual impact.

              • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                So any public works in a black community counts as reparations to you, but you also think none of that is happening?

                • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Where the hell did you get that idea? Reparations would be separate from regular public works.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 months ago

              An example of what you discuss shows in the reparations to the Seminole tribe. Many freed slaves or escaped slaves never signed documentation (like a census for the tribe) as they were more worried about getting found/cheated etc. Last I knew there were court cases still open or closed in the past couple decades pertaining to such.

            • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              You’d need to mitigate the reparations paid by also calculating the generational loss of wealth over the same period by “unaffected” citizens.

              What reparations should be paid for is for red lining, as that is a problem that is arguably still ongoing and which has impacts on today’s generational wealth recently enough to not have been reduced by the average loss of wealth over generational entropy, not to mention the parallel to the original promise of reparations “40 acres and a mule”, not sure how many urban black families would be looking forward to having basically a horse to now take care of but the value of land they were denied access to is deffo something that american black families would be greatly advanced by.

              • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                Now that would be really hard to figure out, you’d have to determine what sort of jobs were done as slaves and how many hours. I don’t think slavers kept those sorts of records in the antebellum South.

                Even granting the value of 40 acres and a mule plus 200 years of interest to descendants of slaves would be a challenge.

              • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Some speculate nothing at this point since generational wealth doesn’t tend to stick around for long,

                The more sensible solution is instead paying reparations for red lining since the fiscal affects of that are directly observable today without argument over generational entropy, and because it’s arguably still ongoing.

          • lemmefixdat4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you really want to fuel the GOP, pass some reparations that cross generational lines. They will immediately point out how some recipients are squandering the money. Resentment will build. It will ignite latent racism. And then the Indigenous Peoples will want the same deal, and the Chinese, and then everyone who had a female ancestor treated as an inferior human will want their cut! You make one minority segment happy while sowing discontent among the rest. Reparations that are not directly related to the wrongs done to an individual are a slippery slope. There are better ways to deal with the inequities of the past.

          • randon31415@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            10 months ago

            I have an ancestors who was owed money from the king of England for a loan made in the 1700s. The bank handling the account said that the money had to be evenly divided among the descends. What started out as a literal kings ransom got down to under $10 when divided evenly.

            The original slavey reparations was an acre of land and a mule. Divided equally, even assuming multiple slave ancestors, would be a few square feet and just enough mule hair to make brush. Reparations done on the scale of harm done equally divided would be insulting. Making things better for everyone is a much easier sell.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thanks for the thorough list, that all seems like good stuff to me except I’d prefer reforming prisons and making them like the Nordic model instead of abolishing them.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          prison abolition is uncomfortable at first, so I understand. Nordic prisons would be a massive improvement, but to me it’s just polishing a turd

            • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              find and address the problems that cause people to behave that way, to prevent it from happening in the first place.

              • oatscoop@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                28
                ·
                10 months ago

                We absolutely can greatly reduce crime by doing that and should – but that’s not going to completely eliminate those crimes.

                People are going to slip through the cracks, and sociopaths are still going to exist.

              • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                10 months ago

                Yeah that’s nice and feel good but you can’t deny that there are people who behave badly because they’re just rotten people.

                Domestic abusers are a key example, people go through the same supposed stressors that DV perps go through without belt whipping their kid for not being man enough at the age of 5.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            A big part of what makes our prisons so terrible and why we throw so many people into them has to do with the 13th amendment, as you acknowledged. If they cease to be profitable, if prisoners cannot be used as slave labor, a lot of what makes them terrible will evaporate. If every prisoner costs the state money, expect them to create fewer of them.

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not a legislator. In general, I think they would look like substantial investments into black communities, rather than direct cash payments.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Look over black families that trace back to at least one person who would have been eligible for New Deal and Post War housing benefits but did not receive them due to the colour of their skin or for living in a redlined neighborhood or other factors of the like, calculate an average benefit to each generation following from Americans who did get those benefits, and pay out accordingly to modern black and mixed race households.

          It is debatable if there’s even money that could be paid back for slavery since those wages arguably may have already exhausted their extragenerational benefit, but redlining and housing benefits denial is a crime we can observe clearly in the present day, and who’s generational benefits are well argued to be still in hand for the families that did get them.

          • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Tax break for… people who can prove their family history traces back to a slave?

            That’s where it will be caught up in the court system. You can’t just say “I’m black gimme money!” They’re going to want documentation that probably doesn’t exist or was destroyed

            Also The ‘Chinese Railroad Worker’ descendants may raise a hand.

            • chowder@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Yes? Also what fucking evidence are you expecting nobody kept their great great grandparents papers of sale. I know for a fact my ancestors were slaves, can’t prove shit though

              • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                Don’t cuss at me. That is exactly my point: that documentation is gone or never existed in the first place. It’s not like record keeping for slaves was very good.

                No one is handing out free money without documentation. So that route won’t work.

                • chowder@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  It’s a tax break not free money. There are plenty of ways off the top of my head immigration records would record immigrated from Africa but not those that came in the slave trade. Plus I can show my family has been here for generations on top of that likely certain markers in DNA would show being African American vs being from Africa.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      There is a national black caucus that pretty well represents current black American issues before each election.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Muslim Americans are going to be so shocked when Trump strips their citizenship & expels them from the country of their birth.

    It can happen here.

    • Jaysyn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      The #GOP is outlawing other methods of voting, so good fucking luck with that if you’re going to support Trump by staying at home.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    Their choice remains: getting beaten up, deported or killed or just getting their issues ignored

  • griefreeze@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can someone please identify a few “Muslim issues” that are ignored by Democrats? I can’t seem to think of any political issues that could be considered “Muslim”

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes.

      Removing the Muslim ban (Biden delivered on this)

      Civil Liberties for Muslim Americans (he won’t meet with Muslim rights groups like CAIR)

      Prosecuting hate crimes against Muslims and mosques. (Biden only announced this month that he will get some experts together and make a new policy TBD. Not sure why he waited 3 years to announce he will start to deliver on a campaign promise…)

      Evenhanded Israel-Palestine policy (he badly failed at this)

      Support democracy in Middle East and Muslim majority countries (he’s failed at this)

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        ya, just remember if Biden doesn’t get in, the guy that unironically wants to send Muslims to camps will get in

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          no way to stop this says only country… oh no wait thats shootings.

          what do you call a democratic system where you only have one choice?

          • orrk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            see, you happen to be confusing having one not horrible choice with having no choice.

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                It’s American “democracy” in action

                Clearly we need a different system, because it’s clear that Democrats will never make the types of change we need, and we sure as hell can’t vote Republican

                It’s a farce

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  why are you relying on electoralism to enact change? no, you go out and vote every election so the least bad, and easier to work with government gets into power, not so you can sit back as they do everything

              • orrk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                even in a multi party system, why would there be multiple parties that have similar demands?

                you also again forget that you have a choice of following through with an ultimatum

      • ghurab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not sure why he waited 3 years to announce he will start to deliver on a campaign promise…

        Common tactic. Delay working on vote-winning issues until the end of the first term for that sweet, oh so sweet, double dip.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not American

      In Canada Muslims vote Conservative

      Recently a Liberal visited a Mosque and covered her hair/dressed up for it

      They booed her and told her that Muslims will never vote for a pro-gay candidate

      We had a nationwide march against gays/trans called the one million march for children, Christian and Muslim leaders joined together to organize it

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well many of them do seem to be pretty upset at the US giving military aid to Israel.

  • yesman@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    It occurred to me after I posted this that depicting “black voters” in a meme with a noose might be insensitive. What do you guys think? Did I do a racism?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    votes democrat for house and senate, votes republican for president

    At least I get to see them fight each other while I get screwed over regardless

    Also its funny because iirc most polls and studies have shown that Muslims are still equally split between both parties anyway.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      False. Been an American Muslim voter for 20 years, and majority of American Muslims have voted Democratic ever since 2004 when they wanted to send a message to Bush. Since then you haven’t seen an election with Democrats getting less than 70% of the American Muslim vote.

      I don’t know where you think or heard that Muslims are split, but that’s simply false and you can check exit polling in every US election since 2004 if you don’t believe me.