cross-posted from: https://lemmy.giftedmc.com/post/78147

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.giftedmc.com/post/78146

Hi folks! Today I have asked myself if I could login with one (no, not google or apple or micosoft) account in all the (30 I think) forums that I have to use as a FOSS admin. Nextcloud Forum, Ubuntu Forum, Mint forum, Makemkv Forum, Papermc Forum, linux.org, etc.

We obviously are on a forum-like social platform but we cant make people use this as their forum I suppose. Ideally, I’d like to federate “all forums” so to speak but that would probably take a shit ton of work. https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/does-this-forum-use-activitypub/2545/2

If not federate the content, maybe federate the logins. So that the profiles federate from one place to the next and you can login anywhere without having 30 different passwords for one “service” (forum in this case).

The next step down would be a foss SSO solution. There seem to be some but I hardly see any pages mention them possibility at all. https://sennovate.com/best-open-source-single-sign-on-solutions/

Am I missing something or is this still in the distant future?

Thanks for reading. Have a good one.

  • LerajeEnglish
    10•7 months ago

    ActivityPods are being developed. From their website:

    What is the main shortcoming of ActivityPub ?

    ActivityPub wants to make it possible to create decentralized apps. But to post videos, you need an account on a PeerTube instance. And to post images, you need an account on a PixelFed instance. You must thus handle multiple accounts, with their profile, list of followers, etc.

    How does ActivityPods solve this shortcoming ?

    With ActivityPods, you have only one profile, one outbox, one inbox and one list of followers - all in a single place. Applications connect to your Pod to post activities, read the inbox and fetch data. And of course they can connect to any existing fediverse application !

    • hauiOP
      1•7 months ago

      That is equally awesone and insane! Thank you very much for lmk! I‘m so curious now!

  • @iopq@lemmy.world
    7•7 months ago

    It’s called private/public key pair. If you give the public key to a website, they can let you in as long as you have the private key to encrypt a message that matches the pubic key.

    As such, your public key is safe to share and you can always verify yourself as the owner of the private key if you have it.

    SSH log in works like this.

    • hauiOP
      2•7 months ago

      I mean, I use this for github and my servers but I never had the idea to use this for login purposes! Thats pretty awesone. Any idea if that is possible to use somewhere?

      • lemmyvoreEnglish
        2•7 months ago

        Yes, it’s called passkeys aka WebAuthn and it’s in the process of being widely implemented everywhere.

        • hauiOP
          1•7 months ago

          Thats very cool. Thanks for letting me know.

    • hauiOP
      1•7 months ago

      Probably I suppose. Thanks for mentioning it.

  • @helenslunch@feddit.nl
    2•7 months ago

    If you do that you’re just connecting your activity across the web. That’s why all the data-mining companies have those login systems.

    • hauiOP
      1•7 months ago

      Hmmm… makes sense. But you could have an alias on every site so only you know that its you? (I have the same nickname everywhere so people can find me, I suppose its not a problem for everyone).

  • PenguinCoderEnglish
    2•7 months ago

    There is an identity protocol for achieving that, called zot. However it requires the forums/sites you’re visiting to have Zot implemented. That is likely not the case, as Zot is way less prevalent than even ActivityPub.