• Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 year ago

    Title: Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings is Utterly Awful

    Article: Look at me. Look at me. Hey, Internet, over here. I said something controversial. Pay attention to me.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Right. When people say “don’t feed trolls,” this is the contrarian bait they’re talking about. Not assholes and bigots.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Calling out bigots and assholes isn’t “feeding.” That’s the problem. Telling people to ignore outright bastards just leads the bastards to escalate. You should absolutely identify their bullshit and bluntly tell them where to shove it - and more importantly, forums need to allow calling out bullshit.

          Any moderator demanding “respect” and “civility” is creating an environment where cautious monsters have free reign, unless they also proactively fight politely-phrased abuse. If someone has good reason to say “fuck off,” and you remove the response but not the cause, you are a force multiplier for that abuse.

          But this schmuck? Yeah, ignore that. It is of low quality.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    That guy sounds just like my dad.

    While I’m all for criticism where it’s due, harping about something for decades doesn’t make you any more fun to listen to.

    • RooPappy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      Almost every teenage goes through a phase where they think that criticizing things makes you sound smart. I did it. I have a teenager going through it right now.

      Some people never grow out of it.

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a certain age where it just feels right. I wish I knew the cure, but maybe it’s just something people have to go through.

        Maybe finding something to be happy about.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw a pretty good three hour cut of all three Hobbit movies. I don’t remember what it was called, but I think they only used like 20 min of the last movie.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maple Films’ edit is pretty good. Chops out the majority of the dwarf backstory, all of the wizard side quests, and significantly cuts down the superfluous action sequences, resulting in a strong narrative which follows Bilbo’s story exclusively, as it should.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The animated Hobbit movie from the 70’s is still better than the Peter Jackson trilogy just on the music alone.

      But his LOTR trilogy is better than the animated LOTR one. I mean… It at least finished the story.

      • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there’s an animated Return of the King by the same people who made the animated Hobbit. I haven’t seen it though so idk how good it is.

  • Masimatutu@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Christopher Tolkien agrees.

    But in all seriousness, while I do think the films are alright, they are nothing compared to the books. People should definitely read them before watching the adaptation, it really is an experience.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the movies are the best adaptation we could have gotten. The books a hard read and most of it wouldn’t translate well to film. All the songs, the long winded dialogs, descriptive parts, the ending, etc. I can understand Christopher Tolkien though, especially since he grew up and old with these stories, and probably nothing would ever do it justice compared to what he imagined his whole life.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having read the books long ago, and recently listened to them narrated by Andy serkis, holy shit the books do NOT translate into movie form.

        Maybe a miniseries like Battlestar Galactica, but the budget for it would have to be insane.

        People don’t seem to understand that nobody is going to fimund their dream movie adaptation, because their dream movie adaptation has a larger budget than most countries’ GDP.

        I would LOVE to have seen Tom Bombadil and the barrow wights. I’d love to have gotten to see everything in the book, but let’s be realistic here.

        Go back in time with a few metric tons of gold, fund it however you see fit. I think if given proper funding, and more strict guidelines to keep the funding, he’d make as perfect an adaptation live-action could get in a miniseries. Make it like 90-100 minutes per “episode” and stretch it out however long it takes.

        Do people not realize he was told initially it would have to be shown in ONE movie? And he fought to have at LEAST two, and that the studio we finally got insisted on 3 because this story is too long and complex (and lucrative) to be only two movies?

        It could have been much, much worse. But hot damn do I wish it were better, even recognizing how good it was.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read the books as a child and young adult multiple times before the films came out. The films are fantastic and a solid adaptation for a different medium, they got the feeling down even if some parts were left out as part of the change to the other medium.

      The Hobbit movies are hot garbage though, and I blame studio meddling for those.

      • Hobthrob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the Hobbit movies, I don’t even think studio meddling was the biggest issue.

        Peter Jackson had so much time to prepare for the original trilogy, where as he took over the Hobbit movies quite soon before they were scheduled to shoot and he couldn’t use the preparation the previous director had done.

        So he had no time to prepare and basically had to wing it with 3 movies and little to no prep.

        • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I liked the hobbit movies, but I’m not going to argue that they were good. I even reread the book in preparation. The movie hit all of the points I was curious to see illustrated visually. I thought the new characters ramped up the tension nicely, and the barrel scene was genuinely joyous. I was also glad the singing was such a big part of the theming, including the wonderful opening, where Bilbo is beset by the Dwarfs and has to host them against his will.

          Anyway, I’m not saying I’m right, or that my view is objective, but I enjoyed all of Peter Jackson’s Tolkien movies more than I thought I ever would. Clear evidence that we don’t live in the darkest timeline, at least.

          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interestingly, the added characters and the barrel scene are exactly (some of) the reasons why I don’t like the movies and IMO symptoms for why they’re bad.

            Unnecessary and don’t fit well into the story, they feel tacked on and seem to be there mostly to make the movies more appealing to an action audience.

              • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Can’t judge that assessment but often enough I feel that I dislike the hobbit movies even more than most, so maybe we’re both not quite the mainstream.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I would say my only gripe with the barrel scene is that CGI characters don’t age well and the animation seems weird these days but even the LOTR trilogy has many scenes that look bad to my eyes (lighting is weird, characters look too “clean”…)

        • Glemek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That lack of time is a direct result of studio meddling. The studios pushed Guillermo del Toro out, threatened Peter Jackson with removing the production from New Zealand to force him into coming on as director, and tried to force him to keep to a similar timetable as the GDT production.

    • hamburglar26@wilbo.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I forced myself to read them before watching each movie and so glad I did.

      Overall I think the movies are fine, and I actually prefer the extended cuts because they add a lot of good stuff even if they become absurdly long.

      My main issue is that they seem to always make Frodo kind of a wimp vs how he acts in the books.

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re correct, of course… But the people you’re referring to can be taught to read.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll always miss the scouring of The Shire. I know the movie didn’t need more endings, but it is a big part of Frodo’s end and it’s the big payoff for Merry and Pippin

  • LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hey dol! merry dol! ring a dong dillo!

    Ring a dong! hop along! fal lal the willow!

    Tom Bom, jolly Tom, Tom Bombadillo!

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I’m driving at is that by making everyone flat, no one can grow. When Boromir falls for the Ring, everyone in the audience saw it coming from a mile away. When Denethor goes suicidal, there’s no surprise because he’s a raving madman from the moment we meet him.

        Damn

        • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if it were like he’s suggesting, people would complain that those characters final(ish) actions were out of character and it would make no sense for them to do those things. Just because you can see something coming doesn’t mean it isn’t enjoyable to watch. If you saw two trains heading towards each other on one track you wouldn’t look away simply because the you see the outcome coming. There’s a difference between foreshadowing and being predictable and imo it’s not good criticism.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, and I think Denathor is a good example. Spends his screen time being an asshat. Very satisfying when he gets what’s coming.

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean … the warg fight in the second film is pretty bad. Even Mr. Jackson copped to that part being … under produced.

  • bleistift2@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve watched the first movie and tried reading the first book. I agree. These are among the most boring experiences of my life.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got half way through the final book before I couldn’t take it anymore.

      If he would have only tried to let my imagination fill in become details, it wouldn’t be so bad, but it was a trudge of over detailed explanation of everything.

      Everything that spawned because of it was great, but the books themselves really are overrated.

      That’s said, I enjoy the movies, solid 8/10.