• vzq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

          • branchial@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            These bans are making someone choose between their religious convictions and employment.

              • quarry_coerce248@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Give me all your money or I kill you. It’s not a ban on your finances, coercion, extortion or whatever bad words exist. You can just choose not to live. It’s a choice, your choice : )

              • branchial@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Its not a real choice. It is meant to reduce the number of people of certain religious affiliations from public workplaces aka ban them.

                Consider if the “choice” given women was between presenting male and giving up their jobs. Or not to be considered for a job. It would in effect ban women because they would either have to give up their gender identity at least for the duration of the work or not work there.

                Likewise here it would be allowed to make the denunciation of ones religious convictions a job requirement. It’s atrocious.

    • bedrooms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s stupid. I agree.

      If an Islam woman not in hijab starts wearing headscarves everyday just as a fashion anyway, theoretically it’s not a religious whatever. So what’s the point those far right idiots are making.