• chagall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you actually read the article, you see that this problem is 100% solvable if you use a VPN.

  • Skies5394@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is for the Netherlands, but it’s about the anti-piracy group not allowing defeats in court on the basis of GDPR and ISP refusal get in the way of a good harassment.

    Good read if you want higher blood pressure.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      come on now be nice. warner brothers entire business is hurting when you download that tv season instead of paying for it they might have to shelf another finished movie and claim the multi million dollar tax break again. /s

    • Destide@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      Use a multi hop VPN that doesn’t advertise next to raid shadow legends

      • mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m probably not the best person to ask because we have limited options for speed in Hawaii with how we get our internet. I think the only company with an access point in this state is Private Internet Access, and I use a different one that others probably wouldn’t recommend because it doesn’t have an unblemished history, but I’ve been hoovering up everything for 8+ years with them and haven’t gotten a notice yet.

        But, when my current subscription is almost up, I’m probably going to try Mullvad because I’ve read nothing but unanimous good feedback about them. I think ProtonVPN is another popular one.

        Aside from that, I’m pretty sure if you search lemmy for VPN in the title, a few threads will come back full of recommendations from everyone.

        There’s also this comparison sheet someone on Reddit made and was last updated in October:

        https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ijfqfLrJWLUVBfJZ_YalVpstWsjw-JGzkvMd6u2jqEk/htmlview

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    11 months ago

    What I don’t understand is how an IP address used as an identity? If you have CG-NAT there’s a good chance you share your IP with 5-6 other people (even more possibly). Alternatively you can say I keep my WiFi open for guests so anyone can walk by my house and torrent on my IP (idk NL law but maybe the court will consider this negligence)

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      People behind cgnat is probably less likely to seed and thus less likely to get their IP address logged by these outfits. That’s just my pet theory though, not sure how to confirm it. Anyone ever heard of someone behind cgnat and still got the love letter?

      • AgnosticMammal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Idk about the “less likely” demographics. My ISP had static IP until they dropped it for dynamic IP behind a CGNAT, and no longer offered the chance to buy a static IP.

      • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is a good way to hide, actually. Port forwarding connections are easier to trace long-term. If you make the downloader port forward instead of the uploader, the one who’s easily traced is the one who’s in less trouble and the real targets stay hidden. But leechers are lazy and won’t do that. Some Scene FTPs do this.

  • BluesF@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    11 months ago

    Many copyright holders believe that if they’re able to communicate with pirates, a proportion will change their behavior.

    Yes, they will probably be more careful next time

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Even if they do make it to court; how do they plan on translating an IP address into the ID of the actual infringer? (not the ISP subscriber, they can’t be assumed to be the same, particularly in court)

    Just because I pay for my families internet connection doesn’t make me responsible, culpable, or even aware of their activities. Even less so now that I’m not going to receive any notice of potentially illicit activity.

    If they could haul people into court based on just an IP and get somewhere useful, they’d have done it hundreds of thousands of times over already.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 months ago

      They will skip the notice via proxy (your ISP passing a notice to you without identifying you to the claimant) and go straight to court to have the ISP forced to provide the ID of the subscriber for a specific IP observed to be active torrenting copyrighted materials.

      Then they’ll attempt to recover those court costs from that subscriber as well as sue them for the original copyright infringement.

      I think they’ll have quite an uphill battle with that approach, particularly when trying to prove the subscriber to an internet connection is also responsible for, let alone aware of, the alleged infringement. If it was that easy, they wouldn’t have bothered with notices to begin with.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah this happened during the Napster era and it was so incredibly unpopular and unsympathetic with the general public that it didn’t continue after a while. Suing a single mom on food stamps for thousands of dollars because her teenage son downloaded a game one time is a truly abominable look for a company.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 months ago

    I suspect this is not going to go well when they find poor people who torrent for the community and try to squeeze them for blood in the courts, or find that an academic server is used to seed in it’s idle time.

    This figured into the cruel, heartless reputations of the MPA and RIAA that persist to this day.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’ve turned away from suing pirates directly for alleged costs, because telling a little girl she owes you thousands for downloading a song is really not a good look.

        So they’ve been trying to convince the ISPs to deny service to people, but the ISPs don’t want to piss off their own customers (any more than they already do with hidden fees and crappy service).

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Music piracy is all but dead. Video was dying but is making a comeback now that streaming is as bad as cable was.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            It shouldn’t be. I’m noticing that some songs just don’t exist anymore on streaming services. Don Henley’s Boys of Summer for instance, and Play With Me by Thompson Twins (the Cool World version)

            Once again, it’s up to pirates to make sure that all versions of songs are archived.

    • Yglorba@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, it says that they’re all “well we would have rather do it the other way for your sakes” but the fact is that if they thought they could reliably obtain money this way they’d be doing it already. A ton of legal fees are going to be wasted pursuing people they can’t catch for one reason or another, meaning that their desire to make the pirates pay their costs isn’t going to work as reliably as they’d want.

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    And that is why I don’t torrent, living in Germany. Even just leeching will put you on the radar of, at best scam law firms, at worst motivated rights-holders.

        • ANIMATEK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve been doing it for almost 10 years. I know what I am doing. I have several layers of security.

          If you however are a tech illiterate then of course you’ll get fined. I have friends who got fined too.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Would it be possible to reveal what you did to increase security?
            I always (want to) try to improve mine.

            • ANIMATEK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I have two containers, qBittorrent and the VPN:

              • VPN is fully tunneled and encrypted.
              • qbt only ever sees the VPN as its network. It is logically isolated from my main gateway.
              • there are healthchecks running, so if the VPN fails qbt enters in a restart loop until the VPN is back to a healthy status.
              • I use private trackers for 99% of my torrents.

              You also have to know that these scummy law firms use honey pot attacks, where they advertise themselves as leechers and record your IP if you upload to them. Technically a proxy to another country would just be enough here, but hey, this works too and I sleep better.

              • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Since you use a torrent container and a vpn container I am interested in how you manage to communicate with the torrent container.
                Do you utilize the *arr stack? Also with a docker?
                If the answer is yes, how did you achieve the communication between the containers?

                Reason I am asking is, that I want to connect to my other container but when I bind my container to the service I am unable to let it communicate directly with it.
                By that logic, I’d need to access the container through the vpn container, right? (*arr <-> vpn container <-> downloader container)

                • ANIMATEK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You have to expose the qbt http port in your VPN container. All API communication (arrs etc) goes through here.

      • Schmeckinger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        2 friends got sued for around 3000 each here in germany, but they “only” had to pay 1600.

          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            If more people would torrent over i2p with great internet connections the experience would get better, since all i2p users are part of the network of servers. The slowest connection in the multiple hops decides the connection speed.

            Because all traffic is encrypted and doesn’t leave the i2p network, forwarding traffic from unknown systems is not an issue, similar to Tor middle nodes (Tor Exit nodes shouldn’t be hosted at home).

    • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Seed box or VPN should be options.


      This comment sponsored by NordVPN :)

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          A company admitting they comply with the law when ordered to by the court is a positive to me as it means that they don’t do it unless they don’t do it on a whim and they are complying with the law, which would most likely also include privacy laws. Any company that would refuse a court order is going to be shut down and probably have all of their records turned over instead of the narrow subset that would be ordered by a court.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            11 months ago

            What you want is for them to demonstrate incapacity to comply. “We’d love to help your honor, but as we sell a privacy service we don’t log user activity”

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              https://www.pcmag.com/news/nordvpn-actually-we-do-comply-with-law-enforcement-data-requests

              “From day one of our operations, we have never provided any customer data to law enforcement, nor have we ever received a binding court order to log user data. We never, for a second, logged user VPN traffic, and the results of multiple audits prove that we are true to our policies,” the company said.

              In the event the company does receive information requests from a law enforcement agency, NordVPN says it “would do everything to legally challenge them.”

              “However, if a court order were issued according to laws and regulations, if it were legally binding under the jurisdiction that we operate in, and if the court were to reject our appeal, then there would be no other option but to comply. The same applies to all existing VPN companies if they operate legally. In fact, the same applies to all companies in the world,” NordVPN said.

              So they don’t log and are just admitting that they might need to if they were forced to. That is extremely reasonable.

          • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            You do you but it also means that if they suspect you of illegal downloads or streams and get that court order, that they’ll log that shit and then you’ll receive those lovely letters eventually, making the whole point of the VPN pointless.

      • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You better watch out.
        You better not try
        To pirate movies I’m telling you why
        Motivated rights holder’s coming to town

        He sees what you’ve been viewing
        He knows when you’re online
        He knows if you’ve been sharing movies
        So use a vpn for goodness sake!

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN

    How sad do you have to be

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    imagine if they spent half as much time going after abusers or billionaire tax cheats as they do people who download game of thrones from seven years ago.