• czech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meanwhile, In n Out serves a better burger, for less money, paying their workers $19+/hr.

          • Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They did it in other states but couldn’t in California because of some state law. Innout is one of the few fast foods I still eat, they pay decent wages compared to their competitors, but they aren’t perfect. I think they still have bible verses on the bottom of cups.

      • rifugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does the owner being religious effect whether or not they can pay a living wage and still make a profit? I personally don’t think so. I think the key difference is that the company is private.

        • Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the key difference is that the company is private.

          The magic answer! A private company is run by a C** and Board that are allowed to decide when it’s profitable enough and are not subject to the requirement of coming up with ANOTHER 15% MORE profit THAN last quarter, EVERY. SINGLE. QUARTER. Or be replaced by the shareholders.