• @Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    1138 months ago

    Other sacrifices that Gen Z and millennial employees say they’d make in exchange for a four-day workweek include working longer hours (48%), changing jobs or companies (35%), working weekends or evenings (27%) and even taking a pay cut (13%).

    If people can be as productive with a four-day workweek (and other surveys and studies have shown this to be the case), there should be no need for workers to sacrifice anything.

    Realistically, employers should be the ones sacrificing to keep productive staff happy, including giving them a four-hour workweek with no strings attached.

    • Franzia
      link
      288 months ago

      Tbh if we got a four day work week we would have more time to think about and advocate for the things we want anyway. A pay cut would be temporary.

    • @Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      128 months ago

      If people are as productive in 4 days as they are in 5 days, I don’t see how the employer would be sacrificing anything at all. They would just be saving a day of office lighting bills.

      • @Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        88 months ago

        The employer will see that you “could” be doing more work, since you accomplish everything in 4 hours. “You don’t have enough work to occupy your time”, they’d say in my country.

        That’s why people act busy. Because when you’re efficient, you get punished with more work.

        • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          This is true. My company has afternoons off in the summer (4.5 day work weeks). Basically they acknowledge that no one is doing anything after lunch on a Friday.

          The same amount of actual work gets done. It’s actually more efficient because no one is coming up with useless meetings and busywork.

      • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        The “sacrifice” is number of total man hours going down. Nevermind that the remaining hours are vastly superior to the ones you lose, that’s a number that’s smaller, and unless that’s “how much we’re paying”, numbers being smaller is a bad thing, mmkay?

  • @grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Since when did we have to “give anything up” to get a four-day work week?

    We simply need to take the four-day work week by force.

  • @Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Despite the popular belief that younger generations are champions of remote work, one-third of Gen Z and millennial workers say they’d be willing to work fully in-person if it meant shaving a day off of their workweek.

    [. . .]

    Other sacrifices that Gen Z and millennial employees say they’d make in exchange for a four-day workweek include working longer hours (48%), changing jobs or companies (35%), working weekends or evenings (27%) and even taking a pay cut (13%)

    Translation:

    • 67% would not switch from remote to in-person
    • 52% would not work longer hours
    • 65% would not change jobs
    • 73% would not work evenings/weekends
    • 87% would not take a pay cut
    • Franzia
      link
      248 months ago

      Fuckin based honestly. I thought they would ask for less compromise, but if they’re gonna go for the gut we’d better just tell them how it is. Less hours are proven to make better working happier more productive and cooperative employees. They’re just potentially less compliant.

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      98 months ago

      Hey, studies show 8/4 wouldn’t appreciably lower productivity. Why the fuck should I give my employer anything else?

  • @Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    518 months ago

    Fuck no, I will not budge an inch. Those C Suite motherfuckers stroll on in here for 25 hours a week. Fuck them and fuck the author of this article. I’ll burn my workplace to the ground before I compromise for a 4-day work week.

  • Lowlee Kun
    link
    fedilink
    51
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    “…include working longer hours…” ?? Absolutely not. Who thinks this is a good idea.

    • @query@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, that’s not any kind of improvement, that’s just moving your hours around. People can do that now. Shouldn’t need to. The 40 hour workweek is way out of date, 32 hours is barely catching up to where we should be by now.

      • Lowlee Kun
        link
        fedilink
        88 months ago

        Absolutely. I also find 8 hours to be more than long enough. The days with overtime are actually fucking thievery as the rest of the day goes down the drain due to exaustion. I would prefer 5*6h to be honest, especially with remote work. It is very likely that i will do this in the future but right now i do not want to take the loss of money.

    • TAG
      link
      fedilink
      78 months ago

      I have worked 10 hour days, I was not 25% more productive than I was over an 8 hour day. There is only so much work I can get done during a day. After a while, I get mentally tired and it gets harder to concentrate.

      Often, walking away from a problem, getting a night of sleep, and coming back fresh gives me a different perspective and I come up with new solutions.

    • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      I took this option. 10/4 is significantly better for me than 8/5, so when I saw the availability in the schedule for that, I took it. Granted, I have a job where working 10 hrs and working 8 hours is a negligible difference, but it’s a trade I’d personally make regardless.

  • @Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    468 months ago

    I’ve heard that Sweden did a research about 6 hours long work day (not the same thing as less work days I know).
    The results were simply that the workers were more happy and more efficient.

      • @unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They get it, but to them the only good worker is one who is well controlled.

        If a work week of thirty two hours would be proved equally productive as one of forty, if most in society would be caused no harm from such a reduction, then workers may begin shortly after to consider a twenty hour work week.

        Then, while considered the new objective, workers also may be discovering new opportunities for self care and community care, developing new relationships with hobbies and leisure, and expanding their identities into new facets and in new directions.

        After not too much time would pass, a critical mass of workers might start to feel convinced that the whole system is a house of cards, built only on threat and deception, and deserving be dismantled in favor of one that is new and different.

    • Gyoza Power
      link
      fedilink
      108 months ago

      Personally I would much prefer to have a 6h work day or 6,5 hour (for it to be 32h, like the 4-day work week) than to have 8 hours a day for 4 days. I don’t care about having one more day of free time if I still don’t have as much time during 4 days of the week. I would much rather work less time those 5 days so that I actually have time to cook, exercise and do my shit every single day.

      • @unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        Either is just as good as the other, in the grand scheme.

        Just keep taking away cards, one and then another, until the whole house falls.

    • @hubobes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      I work 7h a day, some day soon I will go to 6.5. I would always choose that over a 4 day work week. Because now I have actual evenings where I can do things. 7 days a week.

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    418 months ago

    4 days. 6 hour day is full time. 24 hour work week is where we should be.

    • ivanafterall
      link
      fedilink
      148 months ago

      1 day, 1 hour, let’s knock this shit out. I’ve got better things to do.

    • @Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      48 months ago

      Exactly I spend more down time at my job then I ever had in my life. Even though my job can’t be done at home we literally could be open only 6 hours a day and still make the same amount of money.

      This how much free time I have. I have read 32 John Grisham novels in the Last two months that is peepered in with other novels. It’s ridiculous the amount of commuting tolls and gas I pay and I might altogether work literally 3 of the 9 hours I am at work.

  • @bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    368 months ago

    I work an extremely physical job. I get home on friday, basically become a vegetable, saturday is a blur if I go out an do anything, and I just start to feel rested and like I want to get up and do stuff on sunday. Of course, i have to go to bed early to make my commute the next day. 2 days off is flat out not enough, and I would really prefer to not give up other aspects of my life just to have free time I can actually take advantage of.

    This works in Netherlands and a number of other European countries, without cutting pay. We should be able to figure it out. Should.

    • @Papergeist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      I smell ya! I used to work 12 hour shifts of manual labor. First day off was always spent with a huge headache. What a waste.

    • Cows Look Like Maps
      link
      fedilink
      258 months ago

      At this point, I think millennials were scapegoated so hard as a generation that some boomers think it’s a synonym for young person.

      • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        88 months ago

        I always thought our inexplicable youth was owed to all the Avocado toast we snarf down instead of buying houses.

      • @unfreeradical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Millennials is just the name for the group despised by Boomers, and Boomers is just the name for the group despised by Millennials. Otherwise, either term is completely meaningless.

      • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        128 months ago

        Five years older than me? Tell me, what was it like working by candlelight to invent electricity with only the warm sound of eight tracks to keep you steady at night? Was Millard Fillmore as awesome as people say? Did you prefer having a coffee with Oscar Wilde or Cleopatra?

        • Bizarroland
          link
          fedilink
          108 months ago

          Hey, we didn’t all know cleopatra. Like you had to be in the right circles to hang out with her.

          I will say though that Alexander Graham Bell was an absolute fucking hoot

  • @penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    208 months ago

    Why does this sound like it’s all made up? lol. I wouldn’t do any of those things for shaving off one day. I don’t want to just switch miseries.

    • gacorley
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      All of the individual things people say they would give up are under a majority.

  • @Damaskox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    118 months ago

    I also have noticed that I start wanting something extra from life after a few months of 8h/5d/w.
    Nowadays I’m looking for my optimal limits. How much can I do work and still consider myself having enough free time?