• FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    246
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    OK, my daughter loves Harriet Tubman. Tell me what you got!” she says. I explain our product, how we use historical women to teach girls about their worth and potential. The mother says: “But is it woke? I mean, I don’t want to teach my daughter about woke.”

    And these people feel qualified to teach history.

      • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        96
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And that’s the really insidious part. The teacher is too ignorant of what she is ignorant of. If Harriet Tubman “might be too woke” then how would this women teach the nuance of protests? Of sit ins? Letters from a Birmingham jail? Much less modern protests. Her daughter is going to grow confidently saying things like

        “I know all about black history, just not the woke stuff.”

        And not even understand the tragic irony.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or she’ll learn on her own later. It’s sad, but many do it. The line of thinking of “we used to treat black people in utterly horrific ways” -> “we freed them but took a long time to give them the same rights” -> “they’re still mad and saying that racism still is a systemic problem” -> “why” is a path that many white Americans with intellectual curiosity have tread. Some don’t like the answers because they come with expectations, responsibility, guilt, and shame. Others decide that it doesn’t matter and accept what is learned.

          It’s a shame she has to start there, but we have to believe that these indoctrinated children aren’t doomed

          • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uhhhhh. Yes it is? My niece was going over all of that around 3rd grade. And that’s about the same time I did, this was all in the PNW. I think your school district just had some major omissions.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            I went through California school a little under a decade ago and can tell you that the letters from Birmingham Jail and an at least somewhat decent overview of sit-ins were absolutely part of my standard curriculum

            Though I’d bet there are plenty of places in this country where that’s not true

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Grew up in Ohio. We touched on it. We definitely ignored the socialism and the condemnation of white moderates and the armed resistance (of that eta) aside from the black panthers who were portrayed with a mixed light much like Nat Turner was. But we were a Catholic school so we did condemn any violence.

              I think the big thing is that it varies wildly. My area for example had a lot of focus on white resistance to chattel slavery, and acknowledgement of the reality of precolombian civilization. That’s not because we were woke but because those that was the local history of southern Ohio. We could go visit an Underground Railroad stop or one of the great mounds for a field trip.

              Meanwhile in somewhere like Virginia, I would expect a lot more focus on the colonial period and early English settlement. And I think in somewhere like Birmingham or Memphis if they don’t focus on the civil rights era that’s on fucking purpose. And I assume texas is doing their own thing and pretending they didn’t secede from Mexico and the US over slavery.

          • Igloojoe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fox news tells them as well. Either way, people too stupid to have a thought originate from themselves.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I equate it to “progressive”

          Which conservatives don’t like because that means they are against progress.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes it does. It means you don’t trust politicians or the system, you reexamine your beliefs and look at it critically.

          If you don’t think there’s a fascist threat in our country right now, there’s people who are literally burning “woke” books and firing elected “woke” prosecutors. They’re using the word “woke” fairly correctly without understanding what it means, ironically enough, because “non-woke” is whatever lies the party spreads and “woke” is anything that contradicts that

      • this_is_router@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        if defining words is that easy for you, can you tell me: “what is a woman?”

        some words are more subjective then others and for many feelings and emotions are more important then objective facts to define anything.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, so give a vague definition then. Give a conditional definiton. Say “woke is when black people are treated like humans and stuff, you know, like when they say marital rape is bad”. They won’t though, because while that is exactly what it means, they also know they can’t say it out loud.

          “Woke” is the thing that opposes their horrible and reprehensible ideas, and they know it. Hell, when DeSantis’ lawyer had to define it in court he went with “the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them.” It’s weird though, why haven’t conservatives just grasped on to this definition? Because “woke” is a dogwhistle for “someone who isn’t a trash human like me”.

          If you want to define “woman”, I can do way better than a vague definition though. Of course, the question itself is in bad faith, but I don’t give a shit. In terms of gender: “A woman is anyone who wants to call themselves a woman and wants to be called a woman by others.”

          Just as an aside, I’m of the opinion gender is a stupid concept anyway and we should get rid of it entirely.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are words that are notoriously difficult to define in such a way that every edge case is covered. For those words we use criteria. Listing off essential attributes and marking the entire list as provisionally sufficient. The Greeks figured this out 25 centuries ago, just a fyi. I know it is hard for conservatives to keep up with modern ideas but 2 and a half millennium should be enough time.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          A women is one of the sexes, usually identified by their genitals. It is biological.

          Not to conflate with feminine, which is one of the genders at the end of the gender spectrum. Which is sociological.

          It isn’t so hard once you listen to the science and understand the difference between Biology and Sociology.

    • gkd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You left out the best part.

      “What do you mean, ‘woke’?” I ask. She opens her mouth. Half-words and phrases stumble and tumble around. A few talking points from news sources fall out. Finally, she sighs. “I don’t know. Just tell me again what you write.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to sell books, oh, 30 years ago or so now.

    The home schoolers were the scariest bunch of people you’ll encounter.

    Had one guy ask where the weather control books were, and I was like “You mean seeding clouds to make it rain? I think we have…”

    “No! I mean the government weather control programs!”

    Had another lady convinced her electricity was going to give her cancer because it came from a nuclear power plant and was radioactive.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not homeschooling, it’s unschooling.

    My parents were both teachers at private or Christian schools while I grew up, and every year, there’d always be a new couple of kids who’s parents couldn’t quite hack it anymore, so they’d send them to school. But couldn’t bear to send their kids to those secular, godless, evolution teaching, sex driven, minority filled public schools, so they’d send them to my school instead.

    Those kids were always some of the dumbest, most ignorant people on the planet. Some figure it out, but most don’t. They just double down. They were usually barely literate, couldn’t do math, and had no social skills. It’s how you end up with a 19 year old freshman who can’t read Dr. Seuss.

    I know teachers aren’t paid much, but if you have the audacity to say that you can do a better job than 4 or 5 professionals at teaching your kid every subject, you should have to take a test to be certified, and your kid needs testing too. Some states require it, most don’t, and it shows.

    • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know teachers aren’t paid much, but if you have the audacity to say that you can do a better job than 4 or 5 professionals at teaching your kid every subject, you should have to take a test to be certified, and your kid needs testing too. Some states require it, most don’t, and it shows.

      Jesus, this makes so much sense that it’s scary to think it’s not universal. Sure, you can teach your kids. Just get certified to do so first. It doesn’t even have to be the same certification as professional teachers, but just a bare minimum, pass the GED level of education. To not have this kind of requirement really seems like society failing those kids.

      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t feel like a GED is even close to a good standard. Setting the GED as the bar is like setting the bar low enough to be in the hell they’re teaching kids about. But I guess it’s at least something.

        Like we are comparing a GED here to people who have masters degrees and sometimes relevant training or degrees in what they teach. It’s like saying “hey if you want to perform an at home DIY surgery on your family, that’s fine, but please play this game of Operation first.”

        • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I totally hear you. I meant GED as in the parent would be able to pass the GED exams now, not that they passed it 20 years ago. I think it would at least be something that could act as a minimum requirement that they can at least understand the material.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      You clearly haven’t seen how bad some of our schools in America are. The war on education has been quite successful.

      • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Playing ‘Bob the builder’ with troglodyte kids in the hopes of mitigating some of the damage their wilfully ignorant parents inflicted upon the world.

        Can we fix it!?..eh, maybe.

  • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I do have one question, though ― do you teach feminism? I mean, I believe in equality, but I am not a feminist, and I don’t want to teach it to my daughter.”

    I take the approach I used in Missouri.

    “What do you mean?” I ask her.

    “Well, do you teach that women are better than men?”

    “No, I teach all genders are equal and should be treated as such.”

    She buys three kits.

    Jesus wept.

    • UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the problem with the kind of disinformation the right wing media pushes. If you describe something in as objective truthful a way as possible, suddenly none of this shit is controversial.

      I’ve seen people totally on board with a description of public health turn around and just rail against how Obama care is Communist.

      So much of this just depends entirely on ignorance. Kinda why these people are homeschooling in the first place.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        Our babysitter was bemoaning her lack of insurance and my ex told her about the Affordable Care Act. She was thrilled!

        “At least it ain’t that fuckin’ Obamacare!”

        Ex said the babysitter was stunned when it was explained.

  • dragonfly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I homeschooled my kid k-12. When I started, I had no idea how many religious hs-ers there were. I used a secular curriculum, and never even thought about teaching anything regarding religion one way or another. Once I started looking around at all the creationist curricula out there–yikes.

    Anyhoo, long story short, my son went on to a college degree (he actually started college classes online at 15–one of the perks of hs-ing for us), and he’s an atheist. Secular homeschoolers do exist!

    ETA some links–these are a few secular homeschool curricula. There’s a lot more out there, but this is the majority of what I used through the years:

    https://www.calverthomeschool.com/

    https://www.oakmeadow.com/

    https://www.keystoneschoolonline.com/

    https://www.thinkwell.com/ (Primarily math–the professor that does most of the math instruction is wonderful.)

    • quickhatch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Secular homeschool graduate here. Parents homeschooled my brother and I because the public school system was drastically underfunded and we were in quite an education desert. I always hate articles like this, as folks tend to paint broad strokes about homeschoolers… But there’s a reason we never had other homeschooled friends growing up; there were a lot of crazy ones, especially in Michigan, as there is virtually no regulation.

    • BlueEther@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are heading down the HS route for our two girls as the oldest has issues that meant that she couldn’t attend school half of last term. My wife has taken her to a couple of meetups and already she come across the Christian and the anti-vax members - even here in far flung New Zealand

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve come to the conclusion that religious faith is a kind of mental illness that was made socially acceptable to keep primitive people from constantly killing each other, sticking instead to only occasionally killing each other within a vague set of guidelines.

    Those of us free of it don’t need an insane corkscrew of Escheresque logic and imaginary higher authorities using threats commanding us to not be monsters.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recently came to a different conclusion. It’s not religious faith. It’s just faith. And it’s not a mental illness. It’s human nature - for a significant segment of the human population.

      Those people who are religious fanatics, political fanatics (e.g. Trumpists, Chavez sympathizers), pseudoscience fanatics (e.g. flat earthers, anti-vaxx, homeopathy), celebrity fanatics (Andrew Tate followers), etc, they have to share the same common traits. They’re impressionable people, they need to be patt of a group, and they can’t fathom the idea of switching groups.

      It’s just that religion-based control came first.

      Or maybe those who were very religious in the past got to survive and thus the genetic traits responsible for fanaticism spread like fire?

      Regardless, it’s appalling.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like Hugo Chavez? Are there any people who care enough about him who arent Venezuelan?

          Like Tito, Castro, Ho Chi Minh, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Che Guevara are all infinitely more valid than fucking Chavez.

          • KepBen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve been an internet socialist for a long time and I have no idea why you think Venezuelans, specifically, are a big problem on the internet.

            Maybe the people you hate aren’t really a cult of personality, but it makes you feel better to think about them that way?

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      People in the past weren’t us in different clothes and religion was basically fulfilling political and cultural functions as well. Like today was have mass media and entertainment, at one point religion was basically entertainment as well. People loved having some preacher come to town and do his show, it was what people talked about. Now we have TV shows and movies etc, and a lot of our media has shocking moral implications just as we’d judge religion in the past for. Not all that different. That leads in to civil/civic religion which is practiced by many today and provides a framework for things like a national identity. When you stand for an anthem you’re performing a civil religious ritual, visiting historical/cultural sites is a sort of pilgrimage.

      The form that religion evolved through in history was also defined by the conditions of the society and a lot of times compromises with neighboring powers. Viewing religion as a dumb thing for stupid people is intuitively tempting, but it’s ahistorical in that it says more about our views today (including religous/civil religious views) than it does about what people were like in the past.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean you might be kinda right?

      So there are people who think with or without internal monologue, common knowledge

      Some people think that the internal monologue may have first developed as an internal dialogue, between the actor, the person and their body, and the “speaker” who they would have not been able to recognize as their own voice, and instead interpreted as a separate being relaying them direction, commands, and interpretation.

      The dissociation between the individual and their internal monologue, and the resulting association of that monologue with a directing and counseling presence, could have been taken as the voice of a higher power guiding them, and by extension, others they got to follow them as the “speaker” of this divinity in their head.

      If this sounds a bit crazy to you consider how many evangelicals rant and rave about their personal speaking term relationship with God.

      So basically, deific religion might derive from people who have an internal monologue but who don’t identify with the speaker of that internal monologue.

      Not really a mental disorder so much as a mode of thought that is prone to lead people into believing firmly that they are personally in contact with a separate being who personally directs their behavior and actions and values.

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In America, right wing supporters are often the dullest tools in the shed. They’re sure they’re right, but they don’t understand how anything works, historical context, how to discern truth from bullshit, or what words mean.

    “I Love the Poorly Educated” -Donald J. Trump

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    American homeschooling seems to be particularly vulnerable to fascist/religious indoctrination. In most countries where homeschooling is common there’s usually a social contract that’s enforced to at least regulate the kind of education kids get outside of traditional schooling.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      My brother and sister-in-law a few years ago tried homeschooling their kids to avoid having to drop $20K a year (each) in tuition to their preferred private school ($20K a year for K-6!) The “homeschooling” situation was actually four days a week in a school with teachers and everything, and one day a week supervising the kids at home doing lesson plans prepared by the school. This alleged homeschooling situation was in place so the school could legally hire uncredited teachers, allowing them to be cheaper - by paying teachers near minimum wage instead of a still-shitty starting salary in the $40Ks. Fucked up in so many ways, but at least this school wasn’t religion-based.

  • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    My step sister is going to homeschool her kids, which will be great for her youngest since she named him Jedidiah. Shockingly someone who named their kid that stopped coming to family gettogerthers after my sister’s kid came out trans.

    She was sad she didn’t get invited to my wifes baby shower, even if my niece wasn’t planning on going I still wouldn’t invite her because you can’t just choose to cut out part of the family because you’re a bigot and expect everyone else to still want you around.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      My father was uninvited from the yearly family reunion due to him not joining the anti-transgender circle jerk that formed there.

      Ironically though I still get emails asking me to come, for the record I am my father’s transgender daughter.

      I feel like they either missed a key detail or they’re just not very bright. I’m pretty sure it’s a little column a little column B.

      If it wasn’t a 2-hour drive, I would crash it for the free food and just not say anything to anybody.

      But I think I could get a bucket from the colonel to myself for just a little bit under what I pay in gas money. Plus that side of my family is so old that all they’re going to bring is fast food anyway. Everyone who was good at cooking is either dead or is too arthritic to do so. A shame, I am a southerner who appreciates the truth of The Stereotype of the home cooked meal.

      The only two reasons why I’m not going to go ahead with that plan of just getting a bucket for myself, is that I would probably get a better meal and support a smaller business by getting my eight piece from Church’s Chicken. Well that and it’s going to be a tight month, my car and my switch need to be repaired at the same time. And I only pray Nintendo leaves my fucking Pokemon data intact because it’s not like I could back that up somehow. I mean theoretically it might have been possible if the damn thing would have turned on.

      Please pray for the safe return of my shiny Dialga, I gave a good Zacian for it.

      • thawed_caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe i’m already half asleep, but i love this comment that starts out on topic then drifts into a unrelated rant written in the most entertaining way.

      • LucyLastic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that they invite you because they think they can “straighten you out”, the garbage they believe is that all kids are straight and cis and it’s down to brainwashing by the deep state Jewish space lasers that anyone would think otherwise.

        For your own sake, best to stay away.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I think you’re overthinking it. I legitimately believe that they actually forgot I was transgender due to how not often they see me.

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Transphobic relatives are a lot like war and timeshares. - “The only winning move is not to play.”

              It does come in handy when you have that one annoying Uncle who acts like he’s your best buddy, when in reality he’s an annoying asshole who doesn’t even give a shit about your company, he just wants to feel young by being “A bro” around the young’uns…

              Second my Uncle Wes found out I was trans, he finally shut the fuck up and just quietly keeps his distance. It has… actually made him easier to tolerate. Now his son, my cousin, on the other hand… Not so much.

              I have nothing against Christians, one of my best friends is a devout Catholic, sharp as a whip too, got his doctorate in Mathematics and is a huge nerd when it comes to numbers, but… I have about as much patience for Young Earth Creationists and Biblical Literalists as they do for me.

              I nearly slapped that child one Thanksgiving when I casually mentioned the existence of dinosaurs while everyone was talking about Jurassic World (Had recently come out), but see, I made the mistake of talking about dinosaurs like they were real animals that once existed instead of Hollywood monsters made up by Liberal Media… So he starts chanting “THE BIG BANG IS A FAERIE TALE! NOT A THEORY!” (despite the fact that a Priest was the one who came up with the Big Bang…), over and over until I “apologize to Jesus” for my “blasphemy”

              I don’t, I just let him keep doing that while I just dig into some Mashed Potatoes, eventually his mom, my Aunt has to coax him into just shutting the fuck up. The dinner table was quiet after that and I spent the rest of the day locked in my room.

              I honestly hate that kid (He’s just becoming a teenager now, my mom had kids way before my aunt did), but it’s clear his Dad messed him up… At this point his Mom understands the problem, has more or less given up on religion altogether (Which tbh, kinda sucks, I hate it when extremists ruin belief systems for everybody else… I’m not a Christian, but fuck, the idea of a Loving God is a wonderful coping mechanism with how terrible the reality of the world is) and is quietly doing the “Grin and bear it for the kid till he’s 18” thing.

              Still good for my Aunt I guess, she used to be a fanatic like the rest of them, my hobby used to be casually trolling her by mentioning which characters in “Current Popular Thing” were gay, just to watch her freak out… But… after seeing the damage her husband’s “Let’s just go ALL IN on the worst interpretation of Jesus possible!” has done to her kid, she’s chilled out quite a bit. Typically I see her without her husband and kid these days, she plans weekends where she comes down to get away from him, which she usually spends getting drunk on red wine, watching movies, and being good company.

              I do hope the kid’s rude awakening when he goes into the real world isn’t too terrible, I’d like to see him snap out of it and realize what a monster his father is, but I’d hate to see him jump to the opposite extreme and become a “Reddit Atheist” ya know?

              (Note: This aunt and uncle are on my mom’s side, the reunion people are on my dad’s side, which is why my Uncle remembers, but my dad’s side apparently doesn’t)

              • LucyLastic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are times I’m glad to come from a small family, the drama is similar but there’s just less of it.

                And yeah, people do come around. I didn’t talk to my mum at all for 12 years, and it was a very slow restart, whereas now she refers to my enby partner as an essential part of the family, and loves when we come to visit.

                There’s other relatives I cut out and don’t intend on reconnecting with, but at least it wasn’t all of them.

      • foyrkopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        My father was uninvited from the yearly family reunion due to him not joining the anti-transgender circle jerk that formed there.

        Ironically though I still get emails asking me to come, for the record I am my father’s transgender daughter.

        I might be misreading your situation, but just from this limited context, your father seems to have his priorities straight. Feel free to tell him that a random internet stranger thinks good of him.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just a really weird loud subsect. They’re so loud now because they finally realize they’re the minority and they don’t like it. So they throw tantrums like children because their lifestyle is a commitment to low education and blind faith in a corrupt version of reality and a misinterpretation of their own faith.

      Sadly, the Internet (troll farms, social media, etc.) has enabled easy access to loudness, to make it seem like they speak for everyone, when they don’t.

      There are plenty of Americans that are Christian and not apeshit. There are also plenty of Americans that are neither Christian, nor apeshit. These two groups just don’t go around screaming about it all day because they’re normal, sane, properly educated people.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    We had to pull my daughter out of her middle school and put her in an online school for reasons I don’t wish to go into, but thankfully the online school is run by the county school corporation and she has a curriculum built by accredited teachers who are also there to talk to the kids by phone, videoconference or in person during school hours. And they are so receptive too. Suddenly I feel like educators care about my child.

    But homeschooling? I would never even think of it. I don’t know the first thing about pedagogy and neither does my wife. We did a less formal version of online schooling that was hastily put together during COVID while she was still in elementary school and it relied on me doing a lot of the teaching and I sucked at it. There’s a big difference between being able to do fourth grade math and being able to teach a fourth grader how to do fourth grade math. A lot of those kids are getting so underserved by having parents, even well-meaning parents, who are not educators try to give their education.

    And that doesn’t even go into the “my son is learning to be a Christian as a homeschooler” bullshit.

    There are definitely kids who would be better served by an alternative to regular public or private school, even school they can do from home. But educators need to be behind it, not parents. Not unless those parents have degrees in education.

    • 50gp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      exactly, parents trying to homeschool a dozen different subjects is always the worst option

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s what co-ops are for. We had one day a week where various parents would teach on their specialty, like theatre, biology, writing, music, etc.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was homeschooled (and very grateful for it), and mom was NOT my teacher. She would organize a lot of things like extracurriculars (mostly for socialization), but the studying I did by myself. She’d tell me where to read and do exercises in the books, and that’s it. And the testing in the end of the quarter would be done by a teacher in the school I was assigned to.

  • Cat without eyebrows @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was homeschooled. I ‘graduated’ without a valid diploma and had to get a GED. I don’t speak to my parents and my child is currently enjoying his day at public preschool. All my church friends who were raised similarly also are in similar situations. That’s about all I’ll say about it.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was homeschooled up until 12. I went to college at 15. That’s about all I’ll say about it.

        • yaaaaayPancakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course not all homeschooling is bad. But these days it does seem that homeschooling tends to skew towards the ultra-conservative MAGA Jesus crowd.

            • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, but also no. Home school gets some seriously unfair treatment in the media, but living it every day myself I can confirm there are quite a few home schooling parents that absolutely earn that criticism.

              One of the hardest parts of home schooling my own kids is finding other home schoolers to meet up with that aren’t frigging nuts.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, even if the parents are educating, the social development of such folks as I have seen is horribly stunted, and stunted during some key formative years. Doesn’t help when the parents are telling the kids they are so smart that no school could hope to teach them right.

          Even if you acquire knowledge, life can suck if you can’t deal with people.

          • tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a home school parent, socialization is really the hardest and most expensive part. We use an online, self-paced version of the state curriculum (provided by the state, so yes it fully “counts”) so that part is pretty easy. But keeping them involved in communities outside the home, with other kids and adults, is a constant effort. They can finish a whole week of curriculum work for all their core subjects in 8 hours or so (hence the online self-paced school), but all the extra curriculars and meetups that keep them socially active consume most of the rest of the week (and many of them are pretty expensive).

            Home schooling is not for the faint of heart, and it’s certainly not the easy button some people treat it as.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tuition paid using the money you stole from the public education system.

        How many poorer kids do you think that money would have helped get into college that didn’t go so you could at 15?

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every student not in public education is money not in public education, literally every state that permits home schooling sees to that via those god forsaken voucher programs.

            • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not in favor of the voucher programs, but you’re diluting the opposition to them by claiming some incredibly misinformed bullshit. Just seems funny that we’re talking about education systems, and yours seems to have failed you.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The voucher program hands parents the money the schools would have gotten for having their child enrolled and lets them spend it on a private school with an agenda or a homeschooling program with an agenda instead.

                Literally it exists entirely to take money that should have gone to the public school system and letting all the rich and white families siphon it off to totally not segregated private school classrooms and totally not creationist and quiverfull homeschool programs.

                If ya don’t believe me just look at the rate of adoption of these kinds of programs and enrollment of rich and white kids in these kinds of programs pre and post Brown V Board.

                These systems were concocted by segregationists for segregationists to maintain educational segregation and inequality.

                • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This feels like you’re a bit defensive about your understanding of the subject. Somehow you’ve been led to believe that this affects every kid not in public school. That’s demonstrably false.

            • impiri@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              We homeschool in North Carolina and get exactly zero dollars for it. You’re correct in general about the terrible effect that vouchers have on public schooling but incorrect about it being applied to homeschooling. I don’t know if it’s different in other states.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s literally what they’re doing, if you think it’s dumb take it up with the dumb politicians who have it out for education that’s legally required to not teach kids the world’s 6000 years old.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would have spent the same money going to college anyway? I just did it earlier, this post makes no sense

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Technically it’s a junior college program because I still had some high school requirements until I was 16 and took the high school proficiency exam. After passing that I did not have to attend any classes in the program.

          At 17 I transferred to a state university as a junior because I accumulated enough credits in the community college.

  • Bizarroland@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Not all women are good,” he explains.

    “Not all men are good,” I respond.

    That’s an amazingly pithy pair of lines

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have often read sovereign citizen groups on Facebook, and they all “homeschool”, which means the big kids babysit the little ones all day long, and sometimes CPS gets involved and removes the kids and terminates their parental rights because they realize the kids aren’t getting educated and are having the shit best out of them routinely. I think homeschooling can be very dangerous for a child.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not very for homeschooling and it has its place, the problem is that it lacks regulation.

      There should be an official education program and tests to make sure kids are learning essential things instead of just babysitting siblings or exclusively learning religious or survivalist stuff.