• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I admit I don’t really know much about that. But Wikipedia says:

    In biology, phylogenetics (/ˌfaɪloʊdʒəˈnɛtɪks, -lə-/)[1][2][3] is the study of the evolutionary history and relationships among or within groups of organisms. These relationships are determined by phylogenetic inference methods that focus on observed heritable traits, such as DNA sequences, protein amino acid sequences, or morphology.

    Where morphology is:

    Morphology is a branch of biology dealing with the study of the form and structure of organisms and their specific structural features.[1]

    This includes aspects of the outward appearance (shape, structure, colour, pattern, size), i.e. external morphology (or eidonomy), as well as the form and structure of the internal parts like bones and organs

    It sure seems to me like that should cover gills.

    • Strawberry
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, fish would be a morphology that includes gills, fins, streamlined body shape for swimming, etc. But there is no good phylogenetic definition because all the animals we call “fish” do not form a monophyletic group. The monophyletic group encompassing all fish would include also mammals, reptiles including birds, and amphibians because these all have fish ancestors

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there is no good phylogenetic definition because all the animals we call “fish”

        The challenge was to come up with a group “which includes both trout and sharks but not humans”. It seems like “gills” satisfies that pretty well.

        • Strawberry
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Animals with gills do not form a monophyletic group.