• clearedtoland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    In all seriousness, if the People’s business isn’t being conducted, how can they possibly be getting paid or getting benefits?

    I said it in another post that Emmer may have been a decent compromise for Dems to extend an olive branch. I’m not saying they’re at fault at all, just that he seemed reasonable.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      For the hundredth time- it’s not on Democrats to unfuck Republicans. If they want to actually be adults they can come to Democrats and offer up their own “olive branch.”

      Let the fuckers stew in their own shit and maybe some people will finally wake the fuck up that Republicans aren’t at all fit to manage a Wendy’s, let alone govern the country.

      • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d say the Democrats should extend an olive branch at the price of heavy concessions, or try to get a few Republicans to vote for Jeffries. Unfortunately, neither concessions or getting someone to cross the aisle will happen, so…guess we’re back to square one.

        EDIT: Why the downvotes? Literally, I said the Republicans wouldn’t go for something that is workable and potentially advantageous to the Democrats.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Republicans are completely untrustworthy. The party has built itself on the idea of “owning the libs” which has killed all compromises.

          The only olive branch the Dems should offer is “we’ll keep things functioning if you abstain from the next speaker vote”. They don’t need anything else. The majority of Dems aren’t the socialist communists Republicans like to fearmonger over

          • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s exactly my point. Their olive branch should come with rule changes, committee re-shufflings, etc. to get the Democrats in a more powerful, better position. But like you said, the Republicans won’t go for that because they’re intransigent, so…back to square one.

        • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re getting downvotes for suggesting the Democrats should be the ones reaching out. No. That’s on the Republicans. The most we should be doing is saying “we’re voting for our choice. If you want to end the madness, vote with us.” That’s it.

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      I said it in another post that Emmer may have been a decent compromise for Dems to extend an olive branch.

      Emmer withdrew without ever having a vote by the full house. He chose to withdraw because he couldn’t convince 217 republicans to support him in the private, republican-only votes. At no point did he seek support from democrats, or even give them a chance to vote for him. Republicans are clearly not interested in any olive branches from democrats.

      • clearedtoland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair point. If they’re bent on pushing it through along party lines, I can’t imagine a single nominee that’ll satisfy the fringe.

        • Chocrates@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s just always been party line. Bipartisanship is mostly dead these days too so it’s a tough time.

          Eventually we are going to be talking about the democrats bailing them out for nothing because we are about to run out of funding for the government among other things.