camel_case@lemmy.ml to Unixporn@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago[DWM] true minimalismlemmy.mlimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up1129file-text
arrow-up1129image[DWM] true minimalismlemmy.mlcamel_case@lemmy.ml to Unixporn@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
Editor: Vimacs (Most feature-full neovim distro) PDF: Sioyek Distro: Arch WM: dwm Terminal: ST Fetch: BunnyFetch LS: logo-ls
minus-squareTootSweet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year ago(Sorry, I’m pedantic, but.) DWM isn’t configured with dotfiles. It’s configured by editing a C header file and recompiling. Not to say camel_case couldn’t share the C header file they used, of course. And of course other programs he mentioned are configured with dotfiles.
minus-squareSpookyOperativelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI mean, I definitely consider my patched DWM as part of my dotfiles, just one that happens to be compiled. And if I can 1-up your pedantry, mine is in .local so it is literally in my "dot"files :P.
minus-squarentzm [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoBut other things are controlled with dotfiles
![[DWM] true minimalism](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/4f7fa8f6-ba2b-4a4d-920d-ea016dc1aebc.png){kind=link}
Dotfiles?
(Sorry, I’m pedantic, but.)
DWM isn’t configured with dotfiles. It’s configured by editing a C header file and recompiling.
Not to say camel_case couldn’t share the C header file they used, of course. And of course other programs he mentioned are configured with dotfiles.
I mean, I definitely consider my patched DWM as part of my dotfiles, just one that happens to be compiled. And if I can 1-up your pedantry, mine is in .local so it is literally in my "dot"files :P.
But other things are controlled with dotfiles