SanguinePar@lemmy.world to Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoLiverpool v Evertonmessage-squaremessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up19file-text
arrow-up19message-squareLiverpool v EvertonSanguinePar@lemmy.world to Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareryan213@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI think it should’ve been a second yellow, based on the cynicism of that foul. He knew else he was doing. Also, Liverpool should’ve had two penalties. Not sure why the first one wasn’t given.
minus-squareTanakaAsuka@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah very confused about that first one as it was clearly a foul, he completely takes Diaz out and doesn’t get near the ball. If Diaz isn’t fouled he is completely free on goal (albeit at a not great angle)
minus-squarekeyez@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe Patterson challenge? Looks a pen at first but on replays there’s no real egregious contact.
I think it should’ve been a second yellow, based on the cynicism of that foul. He knew else he was doing.
Also, Liverpool should’ve had two penalties. Not sure why the first one wasn’t given.
Yeah very confused about that first one as it was clearly a foul, he completely takes Diaz out and doesn’t get near the ball. If Diaz isn’t fouled he is completely free on goal (albeit at a not great angle)
The Patterson challenge? Looks a pen at first but on replays there’s no real egregious contact.