• Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m assuming you’re from Europe, and as such probably are using a gas stove. The front makes sense for gas because it’s wasting a ton of gas to heat up air that goes around your food instead of into it. This means the air above the stove is really hot and will likely burn you, so the dials need to be in the front. For electric stoves, there’s a lot less energy wasted. Almost all of the emerge goes directly into your pots/pans so the air above is relatively cool, unless you’re boiling water or something. Having the dials in the back is easier to see while cooking and more childproof.

      • poppy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This explains why I, as an American who has really only known electric stoves both in my homes and friends homes, am more familiar with back controls, but the fancy cooks I watch on YouTube with gas ranges have them in front (though the cooks are still American). I kind of just associated front controls with “rich people stoves” which was a false equivalence since most of the online cooks I know happen to be rich but it’s the fact they’re gas stoves that makes the difference lol. I also follow one who has an induction cooktop with touch controls which seems kind of annoying.

    • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never seen a stove with knobs on the front outside of restaurant kitchens. I’ve been in many houses of varying wealth levels, and never seen that unless in a residential kitchen.

        • DancingIsForbidden@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          American here and I agree. They even do trucks smarter. The boxy version makes it so much easier to judge spaces and distances down over the hood.

          But of course, we have to be stubborn and ignorant, because we measure things in feet and fingers and spider legs and bags of salt.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If it’s really big they always say how much of a Texas it is. As if anyone really has a good grasp of how big Texas actually is. After all even if you live there it’s literally impossible to see all of it at the same time.

            People are just bad at scale in general, even for objects we obstensively know about, it’s just better to give the actual numbers in my opinion, like, off the top of your head without looking any of it up, is the Eiffel Tower bigger or smaller than the Empire State Building. And what is the difference, are we talking closer to 30 ft or 200 ft?

    • CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have to reach over hot bits in the front to get to hot bits in the back when cooking anyways… once again, for a normal sized adult this poses literally 0 risk of anything.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve used both styles of stove and really don’t have a preference either way (other than anxiety about accidentally bumping into the front ones). My current stove has back controls and it really has never registered as a problem.