It is possible. But in this case, it is occupier vs occupied. An ethnoreligious state vs stateless people being ethnically cleansed. Something being possible doesn’t make it factual.
It would have been okay if they just lived their live peacefully and actually cared to improve. But no, “we need more land and more people over the world seeing how we kill civilians”. This is so going to work for sure, yeah.
Why not pro Palestine? They are the resistance to Israel.
It’s possible for both sides of a conflict to suck.
It is possible. But in this case, it is occupier vs occupied. An ethnoreligious state vs stateless people being ethnically cleansed. Something being possible doesn’t make it factual.
Removed by mod
Then act like it
Removed by mod
Is there a coherent argument here for me to respond to? If so, state it clearly and directly. Your movie analogy makes no sense.
Removed by mod
I take it you don’t understand what “directly” means. Not surprising.
Removed by mod
You didn’t have to draw anything to let me know that you can’t state your argument directly. I already suspected.
It would have been okay if they just lived their live peacefully and actually cared to improve. But no, “we need more land and more people over the world seeing how we kill civilians”. This is so going to work for sure, yeah.