• WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That just means that we need an independent Nazi candidate to pull votes from the GOP, guaranteeing a loss for both.

  • crawley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Third party will never ever happen with the electoral college. Whichever party forms a third party and said third party will both lose 100% of the time.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The electoral college has less of an impact than fptp voting IMO. Ranked choice or Star voting would actually allow third party candidates to win local elections at least.

    • Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For a third party system, It’s not about losing it’s about making sure those other guys lose.

      • TallonMetroid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It about making the guys who you hate least lose, ironically. Voting against the other guy is already baked into FPTP, so if you vote for a 3rd party you’re voting against both the main parties. Except the party you hate the most would’ve already gotten your anti-vote anyway, so really you’re just adding an anti-vote to the other party, which is adding a handicap to them that wasn’t there before.

  • arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If we appointed the president by number of individual donations Bernie Sanders would have won in 2016 and 2020 by a landslide