• DevopsPalmer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It sounds like what the picture is making fun of, already materialized in this kagi search engine. Paying for a search just is a about face from what the Internet was designed to be. You could argue everything is this way, but I’d then argue consumers are bigger pushovers now.

          • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency.

            If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it.

          • kungfuratte@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :)

            Is it because you don’t think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free?

              • kungfuratte@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m not sure if this is really feasible (even though I’d be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model.

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand why you would pay and can respect it. But access to an organized and searchable internet is something closer to a right than a privilege, in my mind.