• DevopsPalmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It sounds like what the picture is making fun of, already materialized in this kagi search engine. Paying for a search just is a about face from what the Internet was designed to be. You could argue everything is this way, but I’d then argue consumers are bigger pushovers now.

      • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everyone pays for search. You do it through attention/data traded to advertisers or currency.

        If Kagi is functionally better than Google and respects my privacy, I would not mind paying for it.

      • kungfuratte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yet it would be interesting to hear, why this shocks you so much. :)

        Is it because you don’t think search engines are a service worth paying for or because Google, Bing, DDG … are free?

          • kungfuratte@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure if this is really feasible (even though I’d be happy to see a working libre search engine). The problem I see is that a search engine is incredibly expensive to run, which makes it hard to maintain servers on a donation model.