• weedazz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    234
    ·
    1 year ago

    The 90s kid in me yearns for a phone with Fm radio, headphone jack, IR blaster, stylus, memory card slot, slide out keyboard and one of those click on projectors the Motorola phones used to have. I would call it the Donatello and it would be radical.

    • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve refused to buy these “flagship” phones that don’t have a headphone jack. The 90s kid in me will live on, damnit!

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I recently bought Bluetooth large headphones and I feel like they’re a massive improvement. However, when it comes to earbuds (which I still use a lot when big ones are inconvenient), I would never buy wireless ones. I am afraid that in a lot of them, battery is not easily replaceable (while in my big ones it can be accessed by unscrewing a cover), and the small things would get lost fairly easily.

          • Ser Salty@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also you have to spend a lot more for good bluetooth ear buds compared to wired. Like, you can get a pair of KZ ZSN Pros for 20 bucks or so. They sound great, have nice material quality (they got metal bits on em!), good quality cable, great sounding mic… you get the idea. To get bluetooth ear buds that sound just as good you’d probably have to spend like 80 bucks? And they’d be made of plastic and not have the mic quality anywhere near the KZs. It’s just so much easier to get good audio quality with a wire.

          • Jeef@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do have a pair of Bluetooth headphones and I use them from time to time. I tend to revert to my wired m50x pretty often just out of personal preference

          • hoxbug@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have some wired headphones for when I am gaming on the computer, but anything else I use Bluetooth earbuds, and I can’t imagine going back to wired ones, never getting the cable caught on things is so freeing. They also have active noise canceling and hear thru which both come in real handy on work sites.

        • Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          53
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why? You can just hire a dude to sing to you as you walk around. Just use a bard, bro.

          • kirklennon@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cables doesn’t consume battery

            When you plug earbuds into your phone, your phone is literally powering the earbuds. The cables transmit an electrical signal; they consume battery. The consumption is fairly negligible, of course, but so is modern Bluetooth.

            • whileloop@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              I believe they meant that bluetooth headphones need to be charged, while wired ones just run off the phone’s battery. Sure, the amount of power consumed might not be that different (though bluetooth will still be more), but its easier for the user to just charge one device.

            • richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The consumption is fairly negligible, of course, but so is modern Bluetooth.

              Sure, that should be why using BT my phone headphones, battery lasts 30-40% less 🤦🏻

        • niisyth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          How pray tell would Bluetooth help with having FM radio? The headphone cable is used as the antenna for phones.

        • FuntyMcCraiger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used to swear by wired headphones.

          The audio quality, not needing batteries, the simplicity.

          But then I got a decent pair of Bluetooth headphones and I discovered how much wires got in my way. I discovered that the audio quality coming out of phones were garbage regardless of connection type, and the headphones I got would last weeks of daily use on one charge.

          Plus I would get a more water proof phone, and I would never have to worry about the headphone jack breaking inside of the port, or my headphones going flying off because I walked past a knob of whatever at just the right height to ruin my day.

          I still want phones to have the ports, but on mobile devices I’ll never use them. I just want others to be happy too.

          • query@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have inside pockets added so that I can deal with the wire issue. Makes for a better place to carry the phone anyway.

          • yamanii@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My old Moto G3 was the only real waterproof phone, whatever you have I bet you take it out of your pocket to swim, and guess what, it had a headphone jack.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If there was a decent phone with FM radio and an IR blaster, I might pick it over a lot of other ones.

        I miss having an IR blaster so much, I was always finding new uses for it. Now I’ve got little remotes everywhere again

        • endlessbeard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same, including an IR led is such a simple thing, why did this ever go away. Though I’m pretty sure most Chinese phones still have them, Xiaomi phones do for sure

      • ArtificialLink@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically all the phones with headphone jacks now have abysmal long-term support. Even the fair phone got rid of the headphone jack so they could sell their bullshit wireless headphones

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a lot more capability with USB-C audio though. Even entirely discounting Bluetooth, there are plenty of high quality USB-C headphones out there that blow the pants off of what you could do with a 3.5mm jack.

        • Neve8028@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          No lol. It all gets converted to an analog signal to drive the headphones. There’s no difference in fidelity between 1/8" and USB-C. It’s literally the exact same signal.

          • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except you’re not limited to the phones hardware and space constraints with USB. You can put the DAC, you know the thing that does that conversion, in the headphone end now, whereas you couldn’t with 3.5mm because you can push power over USB. Meaning you have the ability to get headphones with a much better DAC, which will provide better audio quality.

            It also frees up space in the phone for more battery, different radios, and other things.

            • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a tradeoff of convenience. I want the jack because it’s a universal standard that doesn’t require external batteries or the right alignment of the stars for proper functionality. Quality has been fine since the dawn of the smartphone, IMO, at least for earbuds. You’re still free to use a USB DAC if there’s a jack!

            • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where’s our different radios and other things? They just keep adding more camera lenses, and MORE MEGAPIXELS.

              Nothing innovative or useful, and now we’re forced to buy more shit (adapters) to make other things we already have, work with our phones.

              I’ll stick with my “mid grade” phone that does all of the same things, but also connects to 3.5mm

              PS. This mid grade phone also has USB C if I really wanted a custom DAC, and alternatively I can also charge and listen to things at the same time, with no extra cost

              • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Uh, since Apple removed it they’ve added the mmWave antenna, the ultrawideband chip, the satellite antenna, and a thread radio.

                • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Fair point about Apple. They did also remove the home button and optimized their display further to accommodate that though.

                  If only it wasn’t so proprietary, I could get on the apple train. Still mad about my headphones jacks though.

            • Neve8028@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              DACs in phones these days are totally fine these days. There really isn’t any need for an external one unless you need to drive higher impedance cans. Quality-wise, they’re totally fine.

    • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve an Armor 21, it has the radio, headphone jack, IR blaster and the memory card slot, plus a loud and clear speaker, actual night vision and is rugged as fuck. Base price sub-$250, upcharge for an attachable endoscope.

      • hoodle@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just checked it out, this thing looks sick. But it also looks ugly as shit. Is it as ugly as it looks in person? Specifically not a fan of the RGB LED ring thing on the back?

        • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honest criticisms: It’s a bit of a brick for sure. I turned the RGB ring off. The multi-function button isn’t as usable as I’d hoped, mostly just a flashlight/screenshot button. The headphone jack and USB port are behind a protected rubber flap, so I keep opening/closing it frequently, but that’s to help with being waterproof. While the optional case functions as a good stand for horizontal viewing and for holding, it is inadequate for vertical, and it just would’ve needed a small internal brace to fix that. The case also blocks their wireless charging connectors, if you were planning to use a dock for that. Attaching the endoscope requires removing a tiny screw. The lack of a bottom button bar has taken some getting used to but I’m fine with it now, the side fingerprint scanner is similar.

          Overall I am happy with it. The battery lasts a whole day with high use, it has decent internals for games, the screen and included protector are appropriately unobtrusive, it isn’t running a very outdated version of Android. Perhaps most importantly, it should survive my child who likes to throw my phone and my dumbass who left it in my pocket getting in a pool.

    • UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ll be happy to know that I bribed my kids into watching the 1990 TMNT live action movie this weekend. The younger one loved it, but the preteen was full of critical commentary the whole time. Go figure. But hey, I won one of them over to the TMNT side.

  • Genericusername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are gaming phones, phones with crazy cameras, and iPhones where the lack of features is a feature. What I wish to have is a phone with as many features and functionality as possible.

    That includes (but not limited to): IR blaster Headphone jack MicroSD card slot FM Radio RGB Notification/Status LED

    Rather than a slim phone with a glossy finish that will pick up scratches right away unless wrapped in a phone case, the outer cover of the phone should be rugged and replaceable. Like with old Nokia phones. I don’t care about few extra grams, or another millimeter of thickness. And I’m sure I’m not the only one.

    I was hopeful about the Fairphone at first, but they started removing features as well.

    • nomecks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I changed in my iPhone 3g for an original Galaxy S, with barometer, I thought that by the iPhone/Galaxy 10 we would all be rocking tricorders. What kind of crazy sensors would they jam in by then? Zero. Here we are at generation 15 with no additional cool sensors.

      • Genericusername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s intentional. They’d like to drop features to cut on design and manufacture costs, while taking out features most of the target audience doesn’t really care about. Some of these are just greedy. Phones used to rely on microSD expansion, but once you drop this option you could charge for additional space much more than what the equivalent microSD card would cost. You can also stop shipping phones with chargers because most people have them anyway. This is pure profit as the customer is paying the same price, but doesn’t get a charger.

        As for other features, they probably dropped them because people just didn’t care enough.

        It seems to be incredibly difficult to design a phone from scratch, and that’s why we only see a handful of manufacturers, with the small endeavors being able to make something that looks obsolete by the time it rolls out and even then it takes a few months to overcome all the bugs and glitches. Fairphone is the closest we’ve got, but it’s still far off and strays further with each generation.

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Disappointed Moto Mods didn’t catch on. The obvious approach of “skinny phone with minimal features but you can slap whatever you like onto the back (radios, projectors, beefy batteries, gamepad, etc)” - just makes sense for me. I loved my old Moto Z.

    • endlessbeard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I actually meant to reply to your comment but replied to the main thread by mistake, I had the same frustrations with modern phones losing features, and even fairphone dropping the 3.5mm jack was a wtf decision to me. See my comment on the ulephone 18t, it had virutally everything I wanted in a phone.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That includes (but not limited to): IR blaster Headphone jack MicroSD card slot FM Radio RGB Notification/Status LED

      My Poco F2 Pro has all of those but microSD slot (none of my recent phones have had it, and I’m starting to miss it right now with 128 gb of base storage) and the IR blaster has saved my ass more than once!

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still have my LG v20 because of this. I’d love to upgrade but nothing that’s come out since even comes close.

      • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still have my V10 and v20. My v60 is better though. Definitely some trade-offs but I will argue that v60 is better

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yea, I wasn’t ready to upgrade yet when the v60 came out. I guess I should have said “nothing I looked at to upgrade has come close” looking at it now though the non removable battery is a deal breaker.

          • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still have stacks of batteries for my V10 and v20. I thought it would be a deal-breaker too but it’s not as bad as I thought. The huge battery they put in the v60s really been lasting. I do admit I prefer to wirelessly charge slowly which possibly helps.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The v60 is the best phone ever.

        All the features, very fast, 2 screens.

        My v35 was on par and had the back fingerprint, but otherwise the v60 was the ultimate phone.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Non removable battery is a pretty big deal breaker IMO especially in an era where every subsequent phone is more and more stripped down.

          • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, the v60 was truly incredible, and the battery especially.

            I upgraded to a zfold 3 and the battery life is garbage now.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But when the battery wears out you’re fucked if you can’t find an upgrade. I’m on my 3rd battery on my V20 because I can always just pick up a new one (or at least as long as someone makes them). I’m not saying the v60 wasn’t a nice phone. Just I don’t want one that’s lifespan is limited by the battery. That is a big deal to me.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been saying this for a while now. FM radios and such are invaluable in emergency situations.

    There have been times in the past where I’ve lost power to my house. No internet, no electricity etc in the middle of an emergency weather situation. I had to rely on battery powered radios to learn about what the situation was elsewhere and how long we’d be stuck etc. There is basically no reason why this can’t be incorporated into phones, aside from the fact that phone makers would rather you use Apple Music etc. It should be legislated for I believe.

    • Piers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      1 year ago

      One reason is that every implementation I’ve ever tried relies on using the wired earphones as an aerial and Apple magically convinced everyone that having a 3.5mm port is somehow a bad thing.

      • doktorseven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. The real plea here is “bring back 3.5mm ports.” I’m afraid of the day my old phone dies because I have this fear that even cheap-ass phones are going to abandon 3.5mm headphones for cheap, unreliable, garbage bluetooth trash.

        • Piers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just double-checked. My current smartphone that I partially picked for it’s 3.5mm socket does have built in FM radio that works great and only functions with earphones plugged in.

    • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just buy a $15 FM radio. Especially since you can’t charge your phone when you have no power, but a small radio takes AA batteries which can sit in a drawer for 10 years until you need them.

      • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d think so but every device around my house that I “put batteries in it and forget it” when I need it I find the batteries have exploded and the device is ruined (regardless of the decade on the expiry-date label of the battery). So my plan now is to keep the device separate from the batteries like it’s a freaking handgun and make sure my phone is charged so I can use its light to make my way to the drawer where we keep the batteries.

        • tarjeezy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alkaline batteries are the crappy ones that leak. Get the more expensive lithium batteries, or go full on rechargeable ones, and you can leave them in without worrying about your device getting ruined.

          • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rechargeable batteries self-discharge and get damaged if left unplugged for too long, and explode if left plugged in. They are not ideal for something you want to pack away in an emergency kit.

            • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Almost everything in an emergency kit expires. But many name brand alkaline and non rechargeable lithiums are now rated for ten years shelf life. In addition there are rechargeable eneloop branded batteries rated for slower discharge rate.

              • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes, but there’s a difference between “expires” and “leaks all over the inside of my emergency radio”. And they don’t make it to half their stated lifespans once put into a flashlight and the flashlight goes into storage.

      • DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In addition to being able to take AAs, my FM radio has a solar panel and a hand crank to recharge the included rechargeable battery, which can charge a phone in a pinch. Win all around!

        • Chobbes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It probably also picks up the NOAA frequencies for weather forecasts and will have a standby feature for severe weather alerts. Emergency weather radios are pretty cool, and good to have on hand.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        A weather radio is even more useful. It usually has FM as well, but getting National Weather Service alerts can be vital.

      • knotthatone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes… but… this becomes one of those things that everyone should buy to be prepared but few actually do or they forget.

        I keep a little crank-chargeable radio in our emergency kit but most people don’t. If the cell networks go down (and they usually do in severe weather and most other big emergency situations) most people will lose all of their access to information.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can make your battery phone last a lot when you are not using the display and disconnect from any networks. You can also have some powerbank around. Emergencies won’t necessarily find you in home or wherever your radio is stored in. You keep your phone with you most of the time, chances are, if an earthquake happens, for example, you’ll have your phone with you. Been there.

    • knotthatone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wholeheartedly agree, but I don’t think there’s any saving it at this point. Car manufacturers are dropping it from new models and that’s the only actual AM/FM radio most people actually buy these days.

      Same thing happened to the phone network. It used to actually be possible to call 911 when the power was out. The central stations all had battery banks and diesel generators. Unless the lines were cut, you had service.

    • Cihta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wanted to tag on to your post. I’ve been without power for weather stuff too a few times and one thing i learned was that my cheapie 40" TV would only pull 10-15watts with backlight all the way down. With a small battery bank you can go a good while on that and tune into your local station via OTA. It was very watchable especially given the only light around was my candle.

      For a couple more watts you watch shows off your memory stick as well once the event is over and you are just waiting for the power lines to get fixed… my phone drained nearly as much but to be fair i left the radio enabled so it was hunting for a tower.

      Just something to consider for your gear if you live near the coast or in Texas. Battery banks are pretty cheap.

    • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m glad battery backup can keep the internet going for a long time but I also have data to use and never get close to making a dent in it. If service providers went down though I do have several radios around the house. I don’t go anywhere but I’d I did i would carry a little radio lol. That being said, I miss my smart phone and flip phone that had radio on it. I don’t care about headphone jacks but I definitely would love radio.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The components to make the phone able to decode FM radio take place. Which, in such small device, is valuable. If you really need FM radio for emergency situations, why not take a dedicated miniaturized FM radio receiver?

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure if this is still the case, but in the past the FM radio functionality essentially came “free” as part of either the SoC or modem. Since it used headphone wires as the antenna, the death of the headphone jack pretty much killed any purpose for including it.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no such thing as “free” functionality in hardware. Old SoC may have had this functionality, but it was at the cost of some die space, that has since been reclaimed by other function more useful to most users.

          • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The functionality is, in fact, still there, and basically every phone with a headphone jack turns it on.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Old SoC may have had this functionality

            Modern SoCs still have it…

            Further we’ve moved to Software Defined Radios in general… So it’s all programmable.

          • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hence the quotations around “free”. Qualcomm isn’tgoing to tape out a custom chip without it for you just because you don’t want that block.

            that has since been reclaimed by other function more useful to most users.

            This was my uncertainty, do you know for certain that they don’t include FM functionality on their chips anymore or are you just guessing? The public facing documentation is not exactly detailed enough to tell for sure.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        FM radio was integrated in even smaller phones 20 years ago. And the tech to “decode the signal” is already present in today’s phones. FM are radio signals, just like NFC, Wifi, Bluetooth and cellular.

        • Dremor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not the same radio frequencies, not the sames technologies (analog vs digital). Those radio hardware are very specialized, and won’t work on frequencies or technologie they are not meant to.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because if the cell networks fail, right now there’s no backup method to get crucial information to everyone’s hands.

      Radio are an easy secondary, really long range mechanism to get information INTO disaster stricken areas when normal means of communications have failed.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what happens when we “removed regulations” and allowed Clear Channel (aka iHeartRadio) to buy up most every major station in the country.

      However you can still do short range FM transmissions yourself, as a lot of people do with elaborate Christmas light displays, plus it’s useful in emergency situations.

      • mriguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        plus it’s useful in emergency situations.

        Yes, in case of emergency, tune to a Clear Channel station so they can tell you how the emergency is the fault if the Woke Left.

        • NTNU@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably the US, since they just assume everyone would know they’re talking about the US.

    • Aram855@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Emergencies that would normally sever other means of communications. Think natural disasters that interrupt internet access. Usually radio stations are the first to come back up, and priceless at times where information is key.

    • Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where I am we’ve got the BBC local radio network and they’ve got some amazing local music shows for each region granted all is available via their now locked down sounds app

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In Atlanta we have a pretty nice jazz station (WCLK). The station that NPR took over (Album 88) was a university station and they still play stuff in the evening I think. There can be good content but it is heavily reliant on where you live. Come to think of it, WCLK is a university station as well. So I guess you have to have universities around.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I switched to satellite years ago (when there was two competing services) because I once had an hour long drive and didn’t hear anything but ads the whole way. I was fed up with it.

        I now pretty much use Spotify because XM and Sirius merged, so now there’s only the one service, and they immediately cut features, introduced ads, and jacked up prices. So I cancelled.

        • SPOOSER@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean as soon as two competeting companies merged to create a monopoly it caused massive problems? Who could have guessed!

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bet when you canceled you got harassed for years after with weekly letters in the mail begging you to sign up. Every time I’ve bought a car I’ve had to deal with this same bullshit.

    • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is tangential to the conversation but have you heard of Radio Garden? You can listen to radio stations around the world. As for “good radio stations,” I’m partial to college radio stations like 90.7 FM in NYC. They have a lot of freedom with their playlists.

  • harpuajim@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then you’d need to include a headphone jack since the headphones acted as the antenna.

      • Hitchie_Rawtin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny how the few who’re totally sold on Bluetooth go “ugh, but then you’d need a headphone jack” as if it isn’t an upgrade for others which wouldn’t affect their ability to use Bluetooth at all.

          • eumesmo@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            But what’s the problem with having an analog component?

            Also, your last claim is weird, because the headphones will ultimately require an analog signal, so, it just changes the place where the conversion is made, either in the user device, or in a digital circuit inside the headphones, and the cable diatance is small enough for adding interference. Your better sound experience is probably due to manufacturers making better sound actuators, not due to the digital data transmission. Try some really cheap bt headphones, and you will see what bad quality is.

            • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not an expert on this but, but AFAIK having the analog component inside the device is exactly the problem, as all the components in there cause electrical interference that you can’t really shield against inside such a tiny device. It’s similar to how the built-in PC audio is often quite bad compared to even the cheapest external DAC.

              • Heratiki@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not to mention it’s a form factor that requires a considerable amount of space. That for the majority of users is doing nothing but taking up that space for no reason. Every phone without a headphone jack is capable of getting a jack with a simple dongle. What I love are the people who have absolute no problem with a dangly cord around their neck but lose their shit if you have to connect a 1 inch piece of wire first. They act like it’s a bag phone you attach to your side. And as far as audio fidelity goes the DAC inside a cell phone is nearly always garbage and you’ll need your own DAC anyway which is easy to obtain when it can be powered by your phone.

                • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yup. What I’d actually like to see is a secondary USB-C port becoming much more common. USB-C is just much more universal and if both ports support charging it also helps device longevity since you can still charge if one breaks. My handheld emulation device has two and it’s been handy several times already.

              • eumesmo@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Indeed, interference is the greatest enemy of analog signals. It’s not impossible to shield, though. Other parts are already shielded, but I can see how it could have become more challenging.

                Btw, I thought it was more related to frequency than components size, but now I’m confused, I will look more into it when I have more time. Thanks for bringing this into the topic.

              • eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not an expert either, but the DAC on my Galaxy S10 sounds amazing. It’s just a question of whether manufacturers bother implementing it properly.

          • Bal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t make it at all harder to waterproof the devices. Sony has been making them for a decade now (IP57 in 2013 on the Xperia Z), Samsung didn’t have any issues with the S10 line either. This is just a lie manufacturers tell you to sell bluetooth crap.

          • danwardvs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            get radio.garden or another app

            This requires an expensive (in my country) data plan and cell tower service.

          • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see myself wanting to listen to music in situations where the data signal is bad more often than I want to use my phone underwater or something.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say that like it’s a bad thing. You can still use Bluetooth even when your phone has a headphone jack, and headphone jacks can be IP67 rated so it’s not a concern for waterproofing.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, the only other rating above that is IP68, and that would require them to specify the depth and time that the phone can be submerged. Most manufacturers only go for IP67 because it’s much cheaper to test.

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That I know but I was wondering why you specifically mentioned 67. I guess I misread that as a limit.

            • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nah, not a limit. It’s just a cost/benefit trade off. Manufacturers don’t typically push for IP68 unless they’re specifically marketing the device for underwater use, and believe users will be willing to accept the higher resulting cost.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i remember old ipods could listen to the radio using the headphones as an antenna and i thought it was the coolest thing in the world. listening to a live feed like that is so much more…viscerally satisfying than just streaming a song or even listening to internet radio, where it could easily be just a computer. it’s nice knowing someone is actually creating a show for you in real time

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sadly 95% of the shows are just computers with a pre-loaded playlist. Still fun to know though that you are listening with a lot of other people together.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The shows don’t really exist anymore. At least not in my area. Well over a decade ago they were all replaced by playlists and commercials.

    • Hunter2@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only a couple of the final pod nanos had built-in radio, the other iPods all required additional hardware to be plugged in. I found that the hard way with an iPod classic… Even my shitty flip phone had built-in radio with an earpiece connected lol.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uh, no. It entirely depends on the station. My wife has radio stations in her car that sound almost 100% prerecorded and edited together - I can never tell if someone is actually talking now or if it’s just a snippet from a previous recording. However, if I listen to a very specific radio station from my home country, which I can only get via internet stream, it still feels like listening to the radio. The way of listening has nothing to do with it, it’s all in the station’s programming.

  • endlessbeard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to chime in here to plug the ulefone power armor 18t I just got. I was pretty nervous to get a chinese phone as I’ve only had samsung and lg phones before, but this thing legit blows me away. Not only does it fully support every band that my carrier uses (rare even for phones made for the US market), but it has:

    • Replaceable battery that lasts 3+ days between recharges

    • Extremely rugged, IP69 waterproof and designed for underwater photography (physical shutter button and diving camera app)

    • 3.5mm jack, sd card slot, FM radio (with built in antenna - no headphones need to be plugged in), and an RGB notification led

    • Dimensity 900 chipset that beats a lot of the snapdragon chips on the market.

    • 12 fucking GB of RAM… yes, 12…

    • Wifi 6(ax)

    • Wireless charging and reverse charging

    • A fucking 60x magnification microscope? (Why???)

    • A FLIR thermal camera (Just because, why the fuck not)

    • Runs mostly bloat free stock android

    All that for under $600 (on aliexpress)

    The only thing it’s missing is an IR blaster, otherwise this is the best phone I’ve ever had, bar none. It is a chonky beast though, be warned.

    This has really changed my view on Chinese electronics, especially at a time when phones for the western world are losing features and functionality all the time (including stuff from South Korean). Turns out capitalism isn’t that great for innovation!

    • Madlaine@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a former fan of ulefones:

      They’re great as long as they work, but I already had two ulefones where something broke internally physically and the IR-blaster blasted non-stop, even after the phone was off. Never had other significant problems, tho.

    • herr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn, this seems like exactly what I’ve been looking for… Shame I’m finding it a year late.

      One last really important point you didn’t mention is how long do they serve security updates for?

    • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a conspiracy with the iHeartRadio music festival.

      How many people do you know who get hyped up to go see an amalgamation of 6-15 year old bands with no new music?

      ClearChannel (and therefore iHeart) sells advertising enmasse so that messages and products can be pushed the largest groups. They hype up the music festival like its a great big deal, and then they give away tickets.

      I genuinely wonder how many people paid for tickets vs. “won” tickets from one of the 9 different radio stations that cover their area.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve had family win and go to the event. I don’t recall what they thought about the event or which bands were there… But the event definitely happened.

        • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh it happens. But very few people buy tickets. They win them because iHeart Media packs the event with giveaway tickets. They spend months hyping up the event, and then say that the tickets sell out in minutes. It’s false hype and false demand.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah, got it. I misunderstood your comment a little bit. Makes you wonder what they gain from it at all then no?

            • Promethiel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They included that in their reply:

              ClearChannel (and therefore iHeart) sells advertising enmasse so that messages and products can be pushed the largest groups. They hype up the music festival like its a great big deal, and then they give away tickets.

              Basically, the bands and holding the event are cheap (the bands selected are not in high demand and thus cheap booking) in comparison with the profits of hosting a subliminal ad show with a (happily) captured audience.

              Note that this is my interpretation of the other poster’s message I thought I’d chime in with, I have no first or even second hand knowledge on this topic.

  • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For emergency purposes, mandate cell tower batteries with solar supplement.

    And generators for bigger hubs.

    Cellular internet is critical infrastructure now.

    Same for ISPs. My internet wifi has battery backup, so as long as the ISP stays up we are good.

    Cell towers nearby all went down during the last big power failure. I could hit one distant tower that still had power, but the signal was weak, and the tower was swamped. It could barely push data.

    Next big earthquake will be a total shitshow if that’s not fixed.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a ham, ugh.

      I dream of it being more common to have radios in everyone’s pocket, but it needs to be accompanied by some level of education on how to use it.

      • Chobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe the price of the transceivers would go down, at least, lol. I have a general license and I just mess around with a Baofeng for the most part because I cannot justify buying a better radio. Tempted to get a QCX-mini or Pixie kit for a project… Unfortunately the like… $1000+ transceivers are just way out of budget for me, and I’m not sure I’d get enough use out of it to warrant the expense.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hear you. I have a handful of HT’s, all are 2m/70cm, same as the baofeng’s… I have an alinco and an ailunce, plus two baofeng’s. I picked up a small 20W mobile unit for my car, around $100 or so, all told, plus an antenna. Maybe $150 for everything? A little less?

          I’ve been looking at the software defined radios on Ali Express for HF stuff, all low power. I think less than 10W, but you can go global on 10W on the right band with the right conditions. They’re usually up for around $350 USD? They’re small too. Good for POTA. I think they can go from 6m up to 40m. Something from the big brands that can do that is usually in the 1200+ range. I think that’s similar to what you’re talking about. Someone local here that I’ve met has one and he’s been lighting up parks constantly with it.

          I want to experiment with DMR more. My next project is to build a hot spot, since the closest DMR repeater tower is a bit too far to pick up. I can sometimes get it at the lakefront (it’s across Lake Ontario from me, in Toronto VE3WOO if I recall correctly), and I’m in the Niagara area.

          I would like to get a DMR repeater in the area and I’ve been talking to a local club about it. So it may just be a matter of time. In any case I’m weird. I use FM a lot still since that’s what all the VHF and UHF stuff around here uses. There’s some fusion/dstar stuff but no DMR.

      • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d imagine no phone would have transmission ability, or at most transmit like a Walkie talkie

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are some ham radio call phones that can transmit. They’re pretty specialized and not cheap, but they exist… around $1200 for what is essentially 3+ year old phone hardware (with software to match … Android 9-ish) with a built in transceiver… I like the idea, but I’m not paying that much for a very old phone because it happens to have a ham radio built in.

          The current ideas with adding radios to phones is almost entirely to pick up broadcast radio, like am/FM. Nothing fancy.

  • variouslegumes@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of posts in here complaining about shitty commercial radio. Do you all not have local radio stations? I love my local stations.

      • amazingBarry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The high school the next town over has the best music in the whole city. Unfortunately I live right on the edge of the broadcast range so it cuts out at home.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Local radio sucks.

      It’s nothing but ads. I’ve tried listening to a couple of them and the music selection is horrendous bracketed by lengthy ads. Bad to worse.

    • Mantis_Toboggan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had read this in another thread, but radio was one of the first (if not first) media form to be entshittified. Decades before we even had a term for it.

    • Legonatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My comment pertains to the USA, but regardless of where you live, there is a very strong likelihood that your local commercial stations are owned by a company like iHeartRadio and much, if not all, of the content is syndicated.

      The only exception might be a local nonprofit radio station. You probably have at best one local station in this case, unless you live in a major city broadcast region. Keep in mind I mean one local station that plays music. A local NPR station is probably separate from this. Even most of NPR is syndicated, however.

      If you’re lucky, a local college might still have a radio station broadcasting over FM, but so many have moved online since you then don’t need an [expensive and volatile] FCC license.