• galloog1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there is functionally no difference between the systems, it it’s fascism. Call a duck a duck. Oppressed people don’t care that the flag is red.

    • horsey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fascism includes various types of oppression not present in other ideologies, such as sexism and manipulation/fear about minority groups as ‘the enemy’.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is a result of the perception that those groups work against the state, not a requirement for fascism. Communist systems have just as bad if not worse a track record in regards to minority oppression as fascist ones.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s unfortunate as theoretically, communism is uniformly egalitarian while fascism is not.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I am sure that is why the Ukrainians starved during the Holodomor and the Russians did not. The tyranny of the majority still exists. It becomes far worse in a less efficient system with no economic outs for the state oppressed.

            Communism is the exact opposite of egalitarianism. It puts more power into the hands of those who control the government/decision making. There is nothing inherently less prejudiced about said government than any other but it does provide a documented incentive to oppress the opposition and the ultimate economic means to do so.

            Theoretically, a liberal economic order with the only central government mandate being protections for equality and justice is the only truly egalitarian solution that is not fascism.

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, that’s why I said theoretically and unfortunate. I was referring to oppression of minorities and women.

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The examples I mentioned were minorities within their current societies. Socialism didn’t prevent Stalin from banning abortion in 1939. Socialism is not inherently better for women’s rights. It does provide more state power which means changes, good and bad can be more thoroughly implemented. This sometimes results in more thoroughly implemented social policy but often results in more effective genocide or no recourse for the oppressed at all.