• BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m gonna say some stuff that most of the people here probably know on some level, but considering this thread, I think it needs to be explicitly said.

    Very few of the people who post comments on the internet are highly educated in whatever field they’re making a claim in. Getting challenged by people who know next to nothing and receive all the upvotes anyway is an exhausting experience, so many well-educated people keep their debates private. If they are here, you probably aren’t enough of an expert to recognize them. The simple, easy to understand takes are what get upvoted, and in-depth, nuanced ideas are almost always ignored or ridiculed. Most forums are full of people who know just enough to feel confident in making calls for radical action without any knowledge of how that action could be implemented or would play out.

    Look through this comment section. Lots of vague, single-sentence arguments about being “capitalist,” “communist,” or “socialist,” along with “leftist,” “liberal,” or “conservative,” but I don’t see a single one acknowledging that each of those words can individually encompass vast groups of conflicting ideas and have wildly different meanings in different parts of the world; a serious problem considering at least a few of the people posting in this thread aren’t in the US. Very little discussion of substantive ideas like “people should be given a universal basic income of $15 a day,” or “food stamps should be granted without application to anyone under a certain income threshold,” or “social media servers should receive public funding and be administrated by an elected body.” It’s almost never more specific than “universal healthcare,” or “abolish the police,” Those might be the right direction, but when was the last time you saw people discussing things like whether experimental treatments should be covered, or the number and type of professions that should replace the current myriad of roles police are expected to fill? I seriously doubt if you randomly selected two self-described communists (or whatever ideology) on Lemmy and had them start making decisions together, that they would agree with each other on exactly how society should be run even half the time.

    I’m not saying these conversations shouldn’t happen, vague as they are. I certainly don’t have the energy to write out long arguments 99% of the time. We all have to make our own way to finding deeper knowledge, and building a knowledge base of buzzwords can be a useful stepping stone. But far too often people stop once they feel they have a sufficient understanding of the buzzwords and then start talking like they know the answers. it’s important to temper the depth of your convictions based on where you’re having the discussion, where you’re getting your knowledge. Are you watching youtube videos and reading unsourced comments, or are you reading research papers from institutions with a history of making accurate claims? Are you reading news articles from ad-supported papers, and if you are, are you checking whether those articles are making sources available for readers check on? Should I have bothered writing several paragraphs under a meme of a glowing red bird, and am I really qualified to tell people to be more careful with their discussions?

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      I appreciated your wall of text! Lemmy, and social media in general, are pretty terrible places for nuanced discussion. The system is biased towards short and vauge posts. As you said though, they can be a good stepping stone.

      There’s been more than one time that I’ve seen people arguing in a thread and decided I’d look up the topic to see who is right. In the end it doesn’t really matter what people in the thread were saying. It got me interested in the topic and I searched out more reputable sources of information and hopefully I learned a bit!

      That being said, there are also threads where people post insane takes. You really need to have a litmus test for whether or not a post should even been considered.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy’s been a lot better than reddit for this in my experience. On reddit you couldn’t even get a sentence out.

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be taken seriously offline I necessarily have to make well reasoned and researched arguments.

      Lemmy is where I come to blow off steam and just berate my ideological opponents because they genuinely are losers.

      It is not a place for nuanced debate.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is not a place for nuanced debate.

        Why not? Compared to other social media it’s way better equipped for reasoned debate, with an easy-to-read layout designed for mountains of text and ease of linking sources. Maybe c/memes isn’t the right place but considering how serious the rest of this thread is I’m pretty sure my spiel was worth it.

        Maybe the people in my social circle are just a lower caliber than yours, but I can’t remember the last time I got asked to source an opinion irl. Most of my friends already agree with me. Hell, offline, most people aren’t willing to discuss politics at all. Even saying you have opinions on politics is basically a faux pas…

        • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a place for nuanced debate because I have no idea who I’m talking to.

          I’d rather devote my time to having those nuanced conversations in real life (which I do) than trying to convince an American online through a meme community that gun bans would reduce school shootings for example.

          • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you actually have a group of peers that consistently challenge each other and have scholarly debate, congrats. You’re in a very small minority. You personally not having a use for arguing online doesn’t mean it’s useless. I know plenty of Americans who have been convinced that gun control is important by things they’ve seen online.

            Very few people in this thread are kidding around. It’s worth pointing out that most of the things they are saying are extremely shallow.

          • Gerudo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why should you only have discussions with people you know?

            If you only have these discussions with people you know, more than likely, they are in your ideological bubble. You are just creating your own echo chamber. We may be randos on the internet, but we could be next to you on the subway or your cubicle. Most of us here probably like to debate somewhat.

            • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never said I only have discussions with people I know.

              I actively have political conversations in real life on actual policy issues with a broad range of people.

              Have you never campaigned before?

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        just berate my ideological opponents because they genuinely are losers

        Im astonished at how closed-minded and brainwashed you seem. Maybe actually think about why you would fight for a opinion that is not based on “well reasoned and researched arguments”… It really seems like youre arguing for another person’s opinion rather than having your own.

    • Anamana@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of vague, single-sentence arguments about being “capitalist,” “communist,” or “socialist,” along with “leftist,” “liberal,” or “conservative,” but I don’t see a single one acknowledging that each of those words can individually encompass vast groups of conflicting ideas and have wildly different meanings in different parts of the world; a serious problem considering at least a few of the people posting in this thread aren’t in the US.

      Actually refered to exactly that with my vague one-liner :D

  • Whyherro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does everything need to be politicized? No one gives a flying fuck if you’re a leftist, unless you’re a Leftist and no one gives a fuck if you’re a right winger unless you’re a right winger. Jesus christ the US Politics are absolute fucking cancer.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s leftist, though there’s a lot of leftists here. Lemmy is more like how internet discussion boards used to be. There’s a lot of people with weird opinions on things, and there’s no Reddit Karma pushing people to conform to the consensus. So people are going to have weird takes on things, and there’s not 1000 comments upvoted above the weird ones, so you’re going to see comments like that. So reply to with you your weird opinions on those weird comments.

    Welcome to the version internet that’s not pre-packaged and filtered to be bland!

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind weird and different opinions on things. In fact, that’s what make the discussion interesting instead of some boring echo chambers. I just wish people wouldn’t be so aggressive about it and hurling personal attacks left and right. The old discussion board had thing called netiquete to keep the discussion civil, but here in certain communities it’s like the wild west.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah… but that’s what the internet is. You’re connected to different people with different points of view, but you’re also connected to assholes. Just don’t take it personally, they don’t know you and you don’t know them.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? You can connect to assholes of that’s your thing, and I can connect to warm clams. No judging

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think people misremember when discussions could be blunt without being abusive, because they didn’t recognize and appreciate sensible small-forum moderation. I don’t want oversight that forbids people from using a list of no-no words. I want human beings to skim a conversation and judge when people are causing problems.

        In real-life interactions, there are legitimate occasions for being rude. Civility is an ideal. It’s not a death cult. You don’t pledge your honor to never calling someone an asshole. You just try to avoid dealing with assholes.

        If a forum does not want strife between users, the mods better be proactive in removing fascists, trolls, bigots, and other dehumanizing forces.

        If mods don’t remove that crap, but demand everyone play nice with those assholes - the forum exists for the benefit of those assholes. Everyone else is an unwitting victim for them to play with. And any moderation against accurately and reasonably saying ‘fuck off, abusive liar’ is acting as cover and force multiplication for abusive liars.

        A vulgar explanation of how someone’s incorrect is often good-faith participation. Infuriating bullshit in televisable language is not.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a great point about moderation, plenty of forums outside of just banning would have mods post in the thread and say ‘knock that shit off, try to be nicer’ or whatever to discourage a toxic atmosphere.

          There can be appropriate times for a range of civility like you said so having nuance is important, but I’ve rarely seen a forum outside of something like Stormfront afraid to ban Nazis or racists without question, unlike some big venues today that try to be ‘tolerant’ or ‘free speech absolutists’.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve seen several subreddits insist that politely-stated fascism is better discourse than calling out fascists. In one case, with ‘so you’re a fascist’ being treated as an intolerable insult… even though being a fascist was apparently fine… and that guy was absofuckinglutely a fascist.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d understand if it were the kind of ‘fuck off, abusive liar’, but more often than not it’s about something so minor, certainly not worth the extra negativity added to the community.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Only meaning matters.

            You have to evaluate claims.

            But that’s never what happens, when rules demand “civility.” They don’t actually enforce positivity. They just punish people who are honest toward minimally-cautious assholes. Quite often without spending one moment looking at the other side of the conversation.

            Reports cannot be handled correctly in a vacuum. Context is necessary. Otherwise ‘you are wrong’ is undecidable.

            It’s like a generation grew up not knowing what trolling is. It’s not harsh language. It’s being an infuriating douchebag, in a way that people understandably tell you you’re an infuriating douchebag. And for all the forums I’ve seen where trolling and getting trolled are equally forbidden, every god-damn one of them treats ‘shut up, troll’ worse than being a fucking troll. Even if it is those exact G-rated words.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? I’m just relieved, I can be myself here… I’ve said so many things here that would have gotten insta-ban on Reddit

    • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. It’s not “Leftist”, it’s just NOT fully of Nazis, and that’s how far our standards have slipped.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy feels a lot more authentic to real life. If I started talking about tinfoil hat conspiracies, my friends would ridicule me to no end.

      As they should.

      Same here.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I start talking to random people in a bar odds are I won’t meet a single one who will start calling me a Nazi because I believe in the Uyghur genocide…

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Tankies tend to assume any accusation against a Marxist state is either a lie or the victims deserved it.

            One of the reasons is that you’ve got people like the Heritage Foundation running around including Nazis in their “victims of socialism” lists.

            Both as the victims and perpetrators btw, lmao.

            Mostly though they just seem weirdly stuck in a Cold War mentality.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Everybody loves jerking off about failed states but leave out how they always have to make it a vacuum while constantly under fire, conspiracy, and embargo by every capitalist state on the planet.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, but how does that change the fact that Lemmy’s communists will call you a Nazi for pointing out the genocides perpetrated by those States?

      • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, I’d expect pretty wild conspiracies like flat earth and chemtrails to be laughed at here, but a disturbing number of lemmings and even progressives in general follow a set of less outlandish - but more insidious - conspiracies that usually fall into the “collusion and malice” type. I could say that General Motors et al. killed most of the US passenger rail and streetcar systems, and most people here would accept that as a fact. Case closed, capitalism is evil and should be abolished, every bad thing is cause by someone with I’ll intentions making it worse.

        I, however, tend to be suspicious of those sorts of takes in general. Returning to the alleged “streetcar conspiracy”I’ve actually done quite a lot of research into this and can decidedly say that the primary cause of the decline of mass transit in the US was… There were at least 5 primary causes, none of which were shadowy groups deliberately working to destroy it. Rather it was killed by a changing urban environment, failures to adapt to modal shifts, legacy streetcar systems just generally sucking, and local governments taking transit for granted and assuming that they can hold streetcar companies to exacting standards while expecting them to remain solvent, all while not considering it their problem.

        I could go on, and can send some sources and references (maybe not direct links though) if you’d like to learn more. But my main point is that far too many people assume there’s a nefarious actor pulling the strings the whole time when it’s usually several factors lining up all the holes in the Swiss cheese and creating a negative externality we still talk about to this day.

        There (usually) isn’t a conspiracy, and if there is it’s unlikely to be anywhere near as all-encompassing as you think. People say there is because it gives them someone to blame, helps channel their anger at something tangible, and just makes a good story.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, this place is full of communists. I’m not the biggest fan of communists, to be frank. There is a lot of backwards ideas that get accepted as “leftist,” when they’re really statist. Particularly revisionist history statist. If a communist party said it, you gotta defend it kinda thing.

      • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t identify as a communist. I just don’t want life to be unreasonably difficult for people. Thats it. I just what the promise of what labor was supposed to be. I want it to free us from the shackles of work or die. Guess that is extreme left now even with tankies around the corner from us.

        • Carvex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. We have 50 years of computer driven exponential growth and not a fucking thing is better for us. We don’t work less, travel more, be richer, live a better life, or have a better future for the planet. It should make everyone anti-capitalist.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          This. When I was younger I considered myself pretty centrist, generally people would agree. My views never really changed, but the Overton window has shot so far right I now get called a commie (I guess here I’m a tankie? Still dunno wtf that’s about except a slur for ‘left of Biden’) because I think a 40 hour work week should put a basic roof over your head, whether an efficency on your own or a roomie in a nicer spot.

          • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            (I guess here I’m a tankie? Still dunno wtf that’s about except a slur for ‘left of Biden’)

            As far as I can make out, tankies are people who support communist governments even when they go way too far. So even though leaders like Jinping are essentially dictators, because they’re ostensibly communist the tankies support them.

            At least that’s what I’ve seen from a few weeks on lemmy. I’m sure some tankies will be along to correct me soon.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, so the thing I still haven’t seen happen except for everyone saying it happens to attack leftist instances.

              Oh, and people attacking others for worshipping someone all in when they point to any particular point of a particular person (IE “In regards to X, Lenin said Y” “Oh HeRe We gO aNoThEr LeNiN wOrShiPpInG tAnKiE”)

              Of course, I’m sure there’s SOMEBODY out here simping for China or whatever, but if that silly small percentage paints all leftists then by their own logic all capitalists should be branded as fascists - WAY more “right” people calling for fascism around here than China worshipperss and whatnot.

      • Rottcodd@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a lot of backwards ideas that get accepted as “leftist,” when they’re really statist.

        This is my objection too.

        All too many people here don’t seem to even begin to understand the inherent threats of institutionalized authority, so in their rush to head off the recreation of the Third Reich, they’re basically advocating for the recreation of the Khmer Rouge instead.

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Define ‘full of communists’… cause it sounds like such an american phrase and perspective. To me, it’s just a more leftwing centered space. The real communists are a minority. At least on the biggest Lemmy servers.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah but those instances are not nearly as big as lemmyworld and the others. I also didn’t say that there were no communists at all. There are just not as many as OP made it out to be.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just checked and you’re instance isn’t federated with Hexbear so you don’t see their users’ comments, my instance was federated with them for a couple of days and it made the Lemmy experience a mess.

              • Anamana@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I have more than one account, none of them get many communist posts. Maybe there’s one in there in a few rare occasions but it’s not significant.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol I’m not crying “SOCIALISM!” because someone recommended taking care of poor people. And maybe it’s just the communities on lemm.ee, maybe it’s because I interact with the communities more because I can’t bite my tongue. But I come across way more communist communities than anything else. Your instance matters. I see a lot of communist communities. As an anarchist, the prevalence of communism on lemmy is troubling to me because I see huge flaws in the thinking and i want to see the left not follow down a doomed hierarchical road that has proven to be a failure over and over and over again.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            i want to see the left not follow down a doomed hierarchical road that has proven to be a failure

            Instead you’d want everyone to adopt a system that literally can’t possibly work. Genius.

            • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What system do you think they are referring to as an anarchist? Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers by owning the means of production and political forces. The system that anarchists advance in place of that can take an unlimited number of forms.

              • Gabu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anarchism is simply opposition to hierarchies that allow control over others, such as the control capitalists have over workers

                Or the control the hierarchical entity (state) must have over a populous to stop thievery and violence. Even in a perfectly idealized world, anarchism only just barely gets to work, teetering on the brink of collapse.

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  We have a state now though, has thievery and violence been stopped? How many thousands are in poverty, how many are killed in global wars waged in the name of profits? There are states where theft and murder are extremely rare, and states where it is common. What is the difference between the conditions where it is common and uncommon? Is a top-down control and manipulation the only way to reduce violence?

                  Anarchism works all the time. It’s more than a political structure, it’s an idea about how to organize relations between people, and there already are many groups that are active that function on anarchist principles.

                  Any group that collects itself in the modern world as anarchist, like anarchist groups in the Spanish Civil War, are heavily repressed by state forces. Capitalist states work together to discourage anarchist ideals even more so than communism because of the possibility it has for threatening traditional power structures.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hm might be. On lemmy, the instances you’re signed on significantly affect your experience.

            Lemmy world and feddit never gave me such vibes tho. But it might also be because you’re indirectly looking for these confrontations.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lemmy.world I think has banned most tankie subs. It wasn’t until the endless problems with lemmy.world that I switched over to lemm.ee and I see way more communist shit, but have way fewer connectivity issues.

    • Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      A heel dragging regressive policy opinion should always be met as such. The world will never go back to the Wild West with gun laws, whites owning everything, women are property etc; to have a political viewpoint desiring these things and feel that it is correct is laughable.

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        What free market? All I have ever known is corporate socialism. Subsidize business with taxpayer dollars. Regulatory capture to prevent competitors from entering the market.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Somehow it’s not socialist when you prop up corporate entities with billion dollar handouts a few times a decade everytime they fuck up but a single mom getting $100 only usable for food because she was let go from her job of 5 years with 10 minutes notice is a communist plot single handedly destroying America.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lmfao imagine simping so hard you believe nobody goes to jail in the name of capitalism in the land of the highest per capita incarceration rate in the world.

              Or gets taken out.

              Or has their government interfered with or overthrown.

              Nope capitalism is love and freedom 💖 UwU 💖

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “If you have a better system let’s hear it”

            any suggestion other than the current system

            “No NO NOOOOO! IT’S NOT CRONY CAPITALISM! WAHHHH!”

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d be interested to hear what you think communism is but I digress.

            My better system starts with providing universal healthcare, education and housing.

            That’s it. I want people to not go bankrupt for going to the hospital, not take out huge loans for university education and not have to pay exorbitant housing costs.

            If you think this is fairy land dreams you have no comprehension of how much money is currently being redirected from these very things into the hands of capitalists so they can have a bigger yacht.

      • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        You see all these people out here suffering and still say this? Where in the world can I get what you are taking because I’d love to be able to tune out everything that hard.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not that capitalism doesn’t have flaws. It’s that all the other systems so far have had worse and bigger flaws. Regulated capitalism with welfare is the least bad system by a wide margin.

      • Izzy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the best at creating rampant consumerism and waste in the name of fake numbers going up at the cost of human happiness and fulfillment.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        What makes you say that? As a random example, leaded gasoline existed for 50 years longer than it should have. We’ve known lead was toxic since the Roman empire, and the only reason it was invented was to increase profits.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much the whole world used leaded gasoline and capitalist countries were the first to phase it out. US phased it out relatively early compared to others, Japan was afaik the first to outright ban it in 86. My ex-eastern bloc country only fully banned it in 2002.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I recall a significant event that happened to the Eastern bloc not long after countries started banning leaded gas, could it be that the collapse of an entire political system prevented those countries from handling that?

            What does the usage have to do with it? It was invented strictly for profit, and as such, leaded gas was the only thing being manufactured. Cars had to be specifically tuned to use it.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy isnt leftist. The group calling itself leftist the most here is at the same time cheering on ultranationalist governments who are in the middle of genocides.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    True. Reddit was pretty center-right oriented. Lemmy leans more left and I do enjoy seeing the Trumpers here getting dunked on pretty frequently.

  • galloog1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Giving full economic power to the state does not make you less fascist. It actually makes it much worse.

    Just a reminder to the true leftists who think they can force through their better society by giving society more power over the individual without changing the culture in the first place.

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      Socialist policies are the obvious answer to health, education, justice and transport issues in society.

      You know, all the things that actually matter in a society.

      The reason we don’t have more of them is because people continually vote against their own self interest.

      Certain strands of Socialism has evolved away from a completely centralised economy in the same way capitalism isn’t actually a free market.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reason we don’t have more of them is because people continually vote against their own self interest.

        Louder for those in the back!!!

        I will never understand WHY people do this. And then higher life expectancy resulting in a growing older generation population preferring policies that actively harm young people

        • Flumsy@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          (Actual queation): Why would you say its in my self-interest to vote for a left party (which would generally mean paying even more that the current 45% income taxes)?

      • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Socialist policies are the obvious answer to health, education, justice and transport issues in society.

        Sure, as long everything is implemented as insurances and not government services.

        People with the need should be in control of how to satisfy that need, because politicians and bureaucrats DO NOT know better. Always remember, someone should come up losing something whenever a need is not met.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The politicians and bureaucrats don’t know better, which is why people tell them what paths we should take as a society. Then when organizations are funded by public dollars they hire experts in the relevant fields. If the public were to take over healthcare for example, experts in healthcare policy would be hired to consult on how to overhaul the medical industry.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      For context: OP is on lemmy.world which blocks the tankie instances if I’m not mistaken. So they seem to refer to based leftist stuff I assume and isn’t a redfash.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The true marxist based left is not woke. It never was. There’s a reason that the western left turned liberal in the 50s and 60s and focused on reform. The CCP killed any thought that decentralized communes could be self-sufficient and centralization killed any concept of liberalism and a responsive command economy. If the majority can vote their way into resources, minorities suffer. With no opposition checking the ruling party, corruption sets in.

        If you are referring to the American Democratic party, they are liberal and not left.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is correct. They draw a distinction between economic left and social left. Mainly, US liberals are vaguely socialist and definitely not communist, but mainly, they embrace ID politics. People who call themselves leftists may hold the same opinions about equality, but consider the economic system and classes much more important.

          • Querk [they/them]@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Most statements I don’t have qualms with, but from my understanding, “liberals embrace ID politics” seems way off. I could see an argument that there’s some kind of split across people who’d identify as or match a typical understanding of a liberal, along the ID politics line, given that it’s so divisive. Id say liberal as a concept existed way before ID politics, do when that became prominent, a lot of people got split along that line. I.e. Far right probably split 90:10, Conservatives probably split 75:25, Liberals probably split closer to 50:50, while social left split 25:75, far left split 10:90 and libertarians split 1:99.

        • lugal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a tradition of leftist critics of Marxism. I don’t agree with each 100% but you can draw a line from Bakunin to Kropotkin to Goldman to Weil to Orwell, … each in opposition of Marx or Lenin or Stalin

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am sure that will protect minorities! That’s definitely never resulted in genocide. It’ll be fine this time around.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bosnia, Rwanda, and multiple acts carried out by the Janjaweed to name some of the more recent ones. Most of the other more recent ones were perpetrated by states against stateless peoples which also shouldn’t speak too kindly to your narrative.

            • lugal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most of the other more recent ones were perpetrated by states against stateless peoples which also shouldn’t speak too kindly to your narrative.

              Well, it speaks to my narrative that states are evil.

              Bosnia, Rwanda

              Correct me if I’m wrong but weren’t these nationalist movements on their way to build a state? Not the kind of stateless society Kropotkin imagined

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, they were trying to build a state. Building systems is a natural progression within human nature. You can try to decentralize it all you want but it just enables optimism. Anything that counts that would require centralized education, aka requiring a state to function and enforce.

                • lugal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  When I’m talking about states, I’m especially referring to nation states, hence my focus on nationalists. Sure, you can use a very broad definition, but than “state” barely means anything.

                  Centralization is a core aspect of states, true. I don’t see how “centralized education” is so inevitable for you? Why not a decentralized education system that focuses more on voluntariness and empowering that on enforcement?

                  Last but not least: Building systems in not the same as sates building. And human nature isn’t as straight forward as it seems to be. You haven’t seen any other system in your life I assume, and neither have I. So it’s easy to think that’s just how it is. The great David Graeber once said in an interview that anthropologists have an affinity to anarchism since they know it works.

            • lugal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Today, the whole world is divided into states but state abolismists want concepts like transformative justice that tries to undo the root of a problem, not just the symptoms.

              Also: stateless doesn’t mean no order at all, but it’s about hierarchy free systems

                • Val@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There is an entity for keeping order. Its called a community. Everyone protects everyone because everyone knows everyone because everyone needs everyone. If you step out of line people won’t protect you.

                  Stateless societies existed for millennia before all the states came along and enslaved them. They had order because strong personal relationships maintain order without leaders.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Decentralization in true left states results in starvation every single time. Centralization results in oppression. The USSR and the CCP went through each of these phases but almost every smaller example does too. The negative relations between the USSR and the CCP even started out as a disagreement around the USSR not following true decentralization until the starvation started.

            I don’t know what to tell you other than the fact that it has been tried. It is not a matter of states failing to follow Karl Marx’ best guidance around decentralization. It fails that quickly.

    • horsey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not what fascist means. Fascism is specific a right wing ideology, because it involves close cooperation between the government and capitalist monopolies. Mussolini praised “capitalist production, captains of industries, modern entrepreneurs”. You seem to mean authoritarian.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I understand the definition of fascism. You are missing the portion by which corporations are not allowed to exist if they do not further the efforts of the state. Basically exactly the same as Marx advised towards the end of his writings. Nothing is allowed to exist in a socialist system if it is perceived to work against the needs of the people (state)

        There is functionally no difference between corporations that do not control the means of production even if they are charged with running it and a state fully owning the means. It’s just middle management.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          A socialist system doesn’t have to be state-based. Socialism can encompass anarchism, anarcho-communism and many other left ideologies besides state-communism.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just like the Soviets and CCP attempted to do before they learned how poor decentralized planning was without incentives. The CCP literally complained about how the Soviet Union wasn’t following the true path of decentralized communes as their people starved. This is literally history. You can argue all you want about how what the Soviet Union and CCP became wasn’t true anarchism but they literally tried it initially and it failed miserably.

            Even Karl Marx said that his intent was more of a direction than blueprints because he didn’t have it all figured out. He also said that allowing opposition parties couldn’t be allowed within any socialist system which cements the concentration of power and eventually consultation.

            All this is why the Western left turned to liberal reform approaches in the 50s.

        • horsey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, but that doesn’t make a leftist system fascist. That’s what authoritarian means in an economic sense. There are many other aspects of fascism.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If there is functionally no difference between the systems, it it’s fascism. Call a duck a duck. Oppressed people don’t care that the flag is red.

            • horsey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fascism includes various types of oppression not present in other ideologies, such as sexism and manipulation/fear about minority groups as ‘the enemy’.

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That is a result of the perception that those groups work against the state, not a requirement for fascism. Communist systems have just as bad if not worse a track record in regards to minority oppression as fascist ones.

                • horsey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s unfortunate as theoretically, communism is uniformly egalitarian while fascism is not.

    • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The endless purity tests of what a true leftist is one of the main reasons they make no real change in the world.

      The constant fighting over doctrinal purity consumes so much time, energy and mind space there is nothing left for actual change.

      • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Laughable you’d level this as a criticism of the left considering MAGA republicans are waging all out war for control of the conservative party in America against more traditional republicans.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is it laughable? It seems pretty obvious that one of the main reasons why conservatives are still successful in the US is that they’re able to unite much more than the left. I’m too lazy to go find sources, but there are multiple sociological studies that confirmed this - despite craziness like Trump and before that Tea party and other shit, the left has been considerably more fragmented the whole time.

          • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If it were true that leftists could never organise to decide a course of action how do you explain the rampant success of workers unions?

            I don’t doubt that conservatives are more likely to just ‘follow the leader’ (I’ve read similar as well) but to say the left is ineffectual because of internal divisions is laughable given the very public and concerning division in the Republican Party right now.

            • V17@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The right might begin to become divided soon, but so far it definitely has not. Regarding worker unions (and the research I mentioned), I’m talking about the modern day, last 20-30 years or so, even though there’s been a lot of fragmentation historically as well. There are no real leftist parties in my country with any success either because of the same thing, endless fragmentation, purity tests and ignoring the fact that actual workers are not socially progressive.

            • ToxicWaste@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Neither of the two parties in the United States of America are actually left. Republicans are far right, Democrats are liberal and in the middle of the left/right spectrum.

    • Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What a moron.

      You’ve been so scared of this communism boogeyman that you’ve allowed yourself to be convinced anything that supports your commu(nity) is bad and oppressive. Meanwhile you have absolutely no means of building yourself out of any issue that may arise further down the line.

      "Derrrrr I’m so glad we don’t have any oppressive Healthcare system built that can be controlled by them demon-crats! "

      -guy who pays more taxes to their Healthcare system than almost any other country and receives NO benefits from it.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Government provided healthcare is not inherently communist or socialist. I’m not the moron here. You aren’t even talking on close to the same level. Also, the American Democratic party is not left. Not even close.

    • Rottcodd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s as if the people who talk about it the most don’t actually have the foggiest idea what a “ruling class” actually is or how it comes to be.

  • tsz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much of a 14 year old do you have to be to take time out of your day to post this shit? Get a fucking life.

  • Stuka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol…the commies don’t know they are the laughing stock of lemmy.