Smartphone sales down 22 percent in Q2, the worst performance in a decade::North American sales are bad for everyone, except, miraculously, Google.

  • 3arn0wl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    1 year ago

    A sign that the smartphone has reached maturity, I guess. People don’t feel the imperative to upgrade any more. That’s good for the planet!

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, but the calculation probably include also less expensive models, which make probably the big part of the market.
          And even for a low price smartphone there is no necessity to buy a new one every year.

          Then I agree, actually probably there is way less people that can put 1000 or more $/€ on a phone every year.

    • tsuica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      poor people are poor as shit

      rich people who are richer off the backs of poor people are not poor as shit

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have plenty of disposable income. But why would I spend hundreds and hundreds on a new phone when I just got a Pixel 5 off eBay for $100?

      • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pixel 5 was peak pixel… I have a 7a now but TBH preferred the 5 just for its size and rear fingerprint reader.

        On the iphone side I picked up an iphone SE 2020 for £120 (no an ios fan but it’s good to have around for development and testing).

        There’s really not justification for £800 phones any more when the older ones are this good…

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The average sell price is up from $663 to $738 year over year, indicating it’s the premium phones that are selling, and all the cheap vendors are getting shut out.”

      Totally disagree with the article’s assumption, I’d say you are more correct. No one wants to or has that much money to pay for ridiculous prices, so sales are tanking. The few who can, or must buy a new phone certainly aren’t going to buy something with no staying power when hundreds of phone makers have coke and gone in the last decade.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean removing a headphone jack, SD storage options, and removable batteries aren’t added value? I know they claim it makes your phone more waterproof, but I don’t wanna use my phone in the pool, I just wanna listen to some headphones without charging them.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no no. Your phone might be waterproof, but we don’t condone the usage of the phone near bodies of water. Intentional submersion of the phone voids the guarantee (actual language on the guarantee of a IP67 waterproof phone).

        • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I find hilarious* that they claim their phones is waterproof while shoving a water sensitive sticker that triggers with the small hint of humidity to deny warranty.

          *infuriating

      • asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally it’s the expandable storage that stops me from ever wanting to upgrade again, I don’t care how much it has base I want the ability to swap it out and add more

      • Mr_Magpie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The new Google 9 comes with 4 wheels so you can drive it without carrying it. We had to remove a bunch of features to fit the wheels and rc antenna, stuff like the phone capability, installing non-Google content, and anything that could prevent ads, Firefox is no longer something you can use, but it’s worth it for zoomy phone functionality.

        Also there’s a subscription fee now or you have to listen to ads before your call.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had a non-waterproof iPhone from 2009-2021 and never had an issue. I hate apple’s BS excuse to sell airpods.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Despite it being WORSE than last year. I went from a iPhone 10 Plus to an iPhone 11 after dropping my phone in used motor oil and fucking up all the speakers/mics. I didn’t realize that I’d be getting a MASSIVE downgrade in image quality. Comparing the photos they take side by side, the iPhone 11 looks like a 4 MP camera from a decade ago. EDIT: OK guys, I get it, I was wrong. It was an iphone 8 Plus, not 10 Plus.

          • ThatFembyWho
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            There was, until some feckless schlub dropped the prototype into used motor oil

            • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              hahah that’s about the sum of it. Never keep your phone in your shirt pocket when changing your oil. This is bugging me, maybe it was a 10 Pro? I haven’t thought about it since I retired it from use. It was an iPhone 8 Plus

              • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t keep your phone in your shirt pocket, period. Most shirt pockets won’t securely hold a US dime let alone today’s 4 pound, 8 inch long smart phones.

          • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was an iPhone 8 Plus. The only thing I like about the iPhone 11 camera is low light performance vs. the 8 Plus. But nearly everything else about the 8 Plus cam seemed better. Image sharpness, noise, telephoto more desirable to me than fisheye, etc.

            • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              lol no worries I was just thinking you meant an XS Max which would be the equivalent to a 10 pro max. Going from that to a regular 11 would be a relative downgrade.

              Idk I jumped over to Apple with the 12 and the camera on that was better than my pixel 4XL. I got a 15 pro max now and it blows the pants off my 12.

    • jwagner7813@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I told everyone that once contracts for cell phones were replaced with payment plans, companies would start gouging their customers with higher phone prices because the customers could now “afford” it.

      Greedy ain’t the right word imo.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know why people still use the big carriers. Subsiding the phones and getting an upgrade every 2 years was the reason to use them. Now they just add the cost of the phone to your bill.

        The brilliant thing is they’ve gone from “We’ll buy the phone, but there’s a $200 ETF” to “we won’t buy the phone, and there’s no ETF. But now if you cancel you owe us $1,000.”

        • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you think you’re not using “the big carriers” in the US I’ve got news for you: you are using the big carriers. They are all either owned or leasing bandwidth from the big carriers. It’s nothing more than an illusion of choice.

          • XTornado@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they are cheaper or different in any meaningfully way, it’s still worth it. Not sure if would be considered an illusion of choice or not, unless you want to boycott them of course. Not American though so not sure how different they are.

            But for example I am on a cheaper carrier owned for the most common carrier here in Spain which is quite expensive. And it’s cheap as fuck compared with the main one and unless you want their tv deal it has 99% of the same services for a fraction of the costs.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m using their towers, but paying 1/3rd the price. My point is why pay the premiumto use them directly if they took away the only advantage of doing so.

    • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly what I was coming to write. Who could have thought that rising notably the prices would have led to less sales?

    • Never_Sm1le@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Phones is basically cheaper now. Features that only found on high end now on low end. SD 4 is insanely good (4g2 is an underclock 730). Very few reason to shell out 1000$+ for phones now

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can still buy a Moto G for like $200 that is better than an old high-end phone in every way and runs Android like a champ. Only flaw is short support lifespan.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They should really stop over saturating the market by releasing new models every year with little to no meaningful upgrades.

    Even mid-range phones nowadays are good enough to last long after they stop receiving updates, it therefore makes little financial sense (for the average consumer) to buy the newest model every year, not even touching on the environmental impact.

  • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’ve hit the wall of diminishing returns. How much power do you need to run lemmy?

    Ive got a 4k oled 144hrtz panel in my phone… to read lemmy.

    And my pixel 6 is considered aging.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you’re upgrading your device every single time a new device comes along, you’re just chasing clout and status. They rarely, if ever, have significant performance upgrades or new features that make sense in upgrading when your current device is perfectly fine.

    • Lemonparty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Phones also aren’t special anymore. Like the days where phones were flashy and people needed the best/newest phones are gone. Everyone knows everyone has a phone, nobody cares what phone it is. It reminds me of like 2004-2008 when laptops were a big deal and then everyone had one and it became a tool and people stopped caring what you had.

    • nyoooom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair the vast majority of people don’t do that and just buy a new phone after a few years when theirs is becoming too old, has issues or lacks useful features

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Planned Obsolescence / E-Waste Entropy seems to have been the main reason I upgraded to a new phone for like the last three phones I’ve owned. Eventually the phone just devours all the processing power and makes it feel bad to use, or the battery stops charging or depletes in hours even while idle.

          • nyoooom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hopefully EU legislation should bring that back in the coming years, I believe they’re working on such law at the moment

            • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              already enacted, vote went through in July. However the “come to force” of the earliest part of the regulation is 2025 and the replaceable battery mandate come to force date is 2027. However I would assume stuff starts going with replaceable battery 2025-2026, since by 2027 it’s illegal to not have that for on sale item. So one would transition year or two early to have ones retail and supply chains empty of the old non-replaceable stuff to avoid having unsold stock or get hit with punishment for being caught selling non regulation items*. So you want the replaceable battery products designed and in production before 2027.

              Also one key I would point out, that is often left out. It doesn’t only cover phones. It covers pretty much all battery powered electronics. SO lots of those other small electronic gadget with built in Li-ions will start sprouting battery covers or possibly moving back to their old power of choice, banks of AAs. Since those are inherently replaceable. Well plus non-recycleables aren’t covered by the regulation. However also the maker can argue their green credibility with “well customer can put rechargeable AAs in it. Then it’s a replaceable battery product.”

              * Well in reality one’s retail partners would refuse to accept the stuff for sale, since upon it being on sale at their shelf it’s now their ass on the firing line by regulators.

      • ArthurParkerhouse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just buy refurbished or “New-Old-Stock” 2-year-old flagship phones off ebay for $100 or so bucks every other year.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fact I think smart phones peaked 3 or 4 years ago and we’re going downhill now. The manufacturers remove features that people like in favor of objectively worse ones (lots of people loved having the fingerprint reader on the back, now it’s either gone entirely or under the screen for some stupid reason?, then of course headphone jacks are going extinct).

      When is the last time a smart phone had a major improvement over it’s predecessor? And I mean like, “This one didn’t have a camera, this one does.” Especially since they’re converging on the same 5.7" black rectangle.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost as if, they haven’t fundamentally updated smartphones in almost a decade, and now they want $2000 for them.

    Also, it’s almost as if we’ve been in a recession for a year. Regardless of whether or not the government wants to call it a recession, we’ve had numerous back to back quarters with negative GDP growth. That’s literally a recession.

    • morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well there are foldables, which are growing as category, but I don’t know if it makes a net difference and anyway they’re too small to make a difference currently.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        "There are some of you who want phones that are easier to fit in a pocket, but we’ll break the deal we made with Satan if we ever build 4 inch phones again, so here’s a 6 inch phone that bends in half. The screen is so soft your stubble will ruin it and the Earth’s atmosphere is too coarse for the severely complicated hinge to survive a month. That’ll be $9900.

        • kalleboo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except whenever a manufacturer, including Apple, tries to market a phone that’s smaller than the average size, nobody buys them.

          The only people who actually want smaller phones are some very loud people on the internet.

  • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s amazing that in capitalism a company has to always show numbers rising like there is no physical upper boundary. The most logical and efficient economic model

    • Ashe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It drives me insane how many people turn a blind eye to the funny numbers needing to always go up. Every “investor” will tell me how the market has never not recovered; how I’m the fool and surely not them for trusting in the system.

      I hate that my retirement depends on a 401k, or money that constantly depreciates.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Constant growth at all costs. In the short term at least. Whether that works out in the long run or not…

  • Chup@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I understand ‘worst sales’ but ‘worst performance’ doesn’t really fit. It’s in my opinion this is a fantastic performance on the market. With right to repair, longer software support, some models with replaceable batteries, we can use the phones longer and make the industry more sustainable and consumer friendly. For the last years already, the model feature upgrades were marginal and it’s fine that way.

    In the future, I’d hope for further technical and regulatory development in that direction, resulting in further reduced annual sales numbers.

    • ydieb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      When the whole western society has been force fed that “we must consume else our economy will collapse”, not continously outselling (and throwing away barely year old work) is bad, this is the result.

  • krakenx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    They doubled the price while removing core features like headphone jacks and microSD.

    The people who bought phones as a status symbol ran out of money and the people who are advanced users are sticking with their old phones that are simply better until planned obsolescence forces them to buy another older model.

    • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t felt the headphone jack removal as much as I thought I would, though I’ve had a few sets of Bluetooth headphones for traveling since about 2014 or so

  • UFO@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have they considered releasing another hard to hold glass slab exactly like the previous one?

    • kaonashi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I upgraded from a 7 to a 14 pro and while it doesn’t hang up on the newer OS as much (a problem the 7 developed over its lifetime), it’s not really an appreciably better experience overall. The camera is nicer.

    • BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On the 7 Pro, stuck on the oneplus navigation gestures, pop up front facing cam. Fully working phone, still no other phone to replace it when it comes to having a screen without a bump. And I can get a free phone through work, but there isn’t one I want yet…