If you resold Taylor Swift Eras Tour tickets, the IRS is watching — A new rule from the IRS is punishing those who resold tickets for more than $600 in profit with a tax penalty::A new rule from the IRS is punishing those who resold tickets for more than $600 in profit with a tax penalty.

    • @hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1239 months ago

      If you resell tickets for 600$ in profit, you’re not “the people”, you’re a scalper and I have no sympathy for you. This is a good rule.

        • @Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          99 months ago

          IRS isn’t in the business of stopping transactions (unless it’s money laundering) anyway

      • @LukeMedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        299 months ago

        Agreed. Obviously, the tax code should be better enforced against wealthy people, but you can support one action without it meaning you don’t support another.

      • @Ajen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        On the other hand, if it’s worth your time to scalp tickets then you aren’t part of the upper class.

        Edit: but I do agree, fuck scalpers

        • @cjsolx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          I’m not well-versed on the subject, but is ticket scalping not a large-scale business at this point? Like, yeah individual ticket holders can be opportunistic, but don’t bots buy tickets by the thousands as soon as they go on sale?

          • @Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Most of those “businesses” are run by just one person, or maybe a few friends. And how much money do you really think they could be making?

      • @archiotterpup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 months ago

        Yeah, it’s cheaper than the big fish and the GOP has continuously underfunded the IRS. Their whole 2024 strategy is to make it look like the extra IRS agents from the Inflation Reduction Act are going after small folks instead of the big fish. Without those agents, lawyers, and staff the rich will always win with bigger guns.

        • @guacupado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          Is it actually cheaper than the big fish though? You could have four people devote a full year to a single multi millionaire and you’d probably still net more than their annual pay. Hell even if you just matched it it’d be worth.

          • wagoner
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The little fish can’t afford a high priced lawyer. A big fish has several and can pay to keep the IRS busy fighting for years.

          • @wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            It is much cheaper. IIRC, the IRS went after Microsoft because they “sold” the Windows IP rights to a small CD/DVD printing factory in Mexico that MS used to print some installation discs, saving an absurd amount of money in taxes due to avoiding US taxes on the IP.

            The IRS spent millions of dollars attempting to get MS to pay up. MS damaged the careers of the people in the government that gave the IRS the resources to go after MS, and cost the IRS an outrageous sum in legal fees.

            Craziest part of it all: MS managed to get the laws the IRS was going after them on changed. Through political donations and lobbying, MS spent considerably more than the IRS was going after them for, to ensure the law was changed in MS’s favor.

            I’m probably getting a lot of details wrong but there are news articles about it you can look up. The IRS hasn’t been given the resources to attempt any common sense obvious big wins since.

  • @x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The IRS doesn’t care if you do crime or are exploitative or are morally bad

    They just want their cut

    Edit: grammar

    • @hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      109 months ago

      The IRS will report a crime if they suspect one, but they don’t make the laws. You’re barking off the wrong tree if you think they should be the moral authority.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      You’re saying that if they suspect someone of profiting off of let’s say, human trafficking, they’d just ask for the taxes and not report the violation?

      • Bahnd Rollard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        No, its still a crime to do a crime, but if you profit from your crime and dont report it, its now a double crime! All sarcasm asside, this is what the feds used to nab Al Capone. It also makes it easier for the feds to seize things that may or should have been owed. Remember, even the Joker pays his taxes.

      • @DogsShouldRuleUs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        Human trafficking is profoundly illegal, whereas scalping is not (in most states (all but 16)) so this makes your comment pretty silly. Not to mention the massive gap in how bad those two things are…

          • @DogsShouldRuleUs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Yes I did say it’s a crime… it is profoundly illegal… my exact words. According to the law, scalping is only “a crime” in 16 states. People can think whatever they want, I think it’s stupid and should be illegal worldwide, but that doesn’t matter. Gotta put your feelings aside when dealing with things like this, and jumping to extremes like you did is irrational and silly.

    • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      Do you even know what the IRS is doing here? If an individual makes more than 600 in profit on anything they have to report it and pay taxes. If you lower that to 60 that would just be incredibly annoying for the majority of people to deal with on a daily basis

    • LCP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      I understand wanting to go after scalpers, but the $600 limit isn’t specifically for ticket reselling websites - it includes transactions not categorized under “Friends and Family” on places like PayPal as well.

      I use various cashback websites who pay out via PayPal and I’m starting to get close to the limit. As soon as I cross it, I either have to give PayPal my SSN or have 24% withheld by the IRS.

      If a friend accidentally sends me money via “Goods and Services” instead of “Friends and Family” on PayPal and puts me over the threshold, I’m the one in trouble.

  • Rose56
    link
    fedilink
    English
    439 months ago

    people who resold tickets bad, ticketmaster who fixes prices good! win-win situation ?

  • @sudo22@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Fuck scalpers, but I refuse to look at the $600 tax rule as anything other than a way for the government to squeeze money from and spy more on the common people.

    Edit: to clarify I’m not rooting for the scalpers, I just don’t want this governmental overreach to be put in a positive light just because its also affecting people we rightfully hate.

    For those that don’t know. The $600 tax rule is a requirement that Zelle, Venmo, etc must report transactions over $600 to the government so they can be taxed. Get a $600 graduation gift from grandma? Taxed. Get $1000 from your roommates to pay rent? You now have to document and show that so its not taxed. Sell a bike (that you ALREADY paid sales tax on using money you ALREADY paid income tax on) for $800, would you look at that its going on the tax form.

    • TJA!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      339 months ago

      Why? Isn’t the person selling the tickets for a $600 profit there one squeezing money from the common people?

      • @Khaelas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        149 months ago

        If corporations paid the way they should the country would be in a lot less money issues than it is.

        Here in the UK it’s often talked about and people get angry about Bob the builder doing cash only work and not paying his taxes. Just another plan from the government and media to cause in fighting rather than look at the real issue, big corps.

        But also fuck scalpers so I’m torn.

        • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          109 months ago

          Speculative profits should be heavily taxed, it doesn’t matter if it’s done by old money that runs the big corporation or by middle class people that are as morally bankrupt. Scalpers and oligarchs are just two strains of the same virus.

      • @sudo22@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        139 months ago

        Yes? I’m against both of the parties in my comment. Maybe I made it sound like I’m in the scalpers side with my tax complaints, I’m not. I just don’t want this government overreach to be placed in a positive light just because its also affecting people we hate.

        • @perspectiveshifting@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yeah I agree - as a small time gigging musician, fuck scalpers and also fuck government overreach here. Anything that hurts scalpers (in all fields, but tickets especially) is interesting to me and the average concert goer, but if it comes at the cost of broadly limiting the used music gear market, among thousands of other used equipment communities, it’s misdirected legislature at best.

          The companies and systems that enable scalping and customer extortion such as Live Nation absolutely need to be limited and restricted, but setting a broad limit across all secondhand sales at $600 when it was previously $20,000 is an inaccurate miscorrection. More informed and nuanced legislature is necessary

          • TimmyDeanSausage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            To add a bit more context to this for the unaware: LiveNation is the umbrella Corp that owns TicketMaster as well as over 70% (IIRC) of the live music industry in the U.S. They’re making a killing on tickets, alcohol sales, backend software licensing, and many different artist/event management firms. They also pay their employees the lowest wages relative to the rest of the live music industry, which was already a vastly underpaid industry before Live Nation came to power in the 2010’s. Further, the CEO’s salary increased by 1000% between 2019 and 2023 while the peasants got a meaningless raise from pre-inflation starvation wages to post-inflation starvation wages. They’re the epitome of an exploitative monopoly, at every level.

            Source: Current part time employee of LiveNation and 14 year veteran of the live music industry.

            A list of their subsidiaries: https://investors.livenationentertainment.com/sec-filings/annual-reports/content/0001193125-08-043193/dex211.htm?TB_iframe=true&height=auto&width=auto&preload=false

    • @canthidium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s not just transactions. $600 is the lower limit on taxable income. I used to do food delivery and if you make under $600 for the year it’s not reported and not taxable. You’re supposed to report any income over $600.

  • @populustree
    link
    English
    299 months ago

    maybe they could go after ticketmaster’s near monopoly and constant breakage of agreements with gov. branches? just a thought

    • @pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      By design. If it weren’t easy for scalpers and bots to scoop tickets in the first seconds they’re on sale, tours and venues wouldn’t be assured their sales are met. Then bot resellers start the actual sale, where the scalpers come in…you, the attendee likely getting sloppy 4ths.

    • @cryostars@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      209 months ago

      Yes and often times way more than that. I checked prices for a Tool concert at a venue near me a few weeks ago and the section closest to the stage had tickets reselling for thousands of dollars. Obligatory fuck Ticketmaster…

    • @variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      Well as per article yes, but 600$ is the reporting limit. If Ticketmaster, stubhub and so on has a reseller account with sales income of more than 600$ per year, they have to file it to IRS. Whether its single sale or thousands of separate small sales doesn’t matter.

      Completely normal tax procedure. Pretty much all big such platforms of various fields stock exchanges, commodity markets etc. have such obligation ledges on them for avoidance of tax evasion.

      Nor as second note is anyone being “punished”. Punishing is what happens on breaking law. This is business taxes, you make profits selling stuff, income taxes start applying. Normal cost of doing business in society for the services society provides (national military keeps the Mongol horde from wrecking your business and so on, transport atluthority builds roads to run business trucks on so the music tour entourage can get to the arena, so one can sell tickets to that conce for profit and son on).

    • @jazzy_jeremy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      This was me a couple years ago but apparently scalpers resell tickets for THOUSANDS. My SO managed to snag a few for their MSRP which is reasonable but they sell out instantly and apparently there’s a market for them at those highly scalped prices. I don’t agree with it but 🤷‍♂️

          • @kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            I produce a lot of my own and mainly buy things like sugar and salt. When you live a low income/low cost lifestyle you kind of get sticker shock with how much people shell out for things.

          • @zettajon@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I get by for 2 people on $50 per week in NJ near NYC by:

            1. Shopping at Aldi
            2. Going vegetarian unless eating out (rarely). Meat is very expensive, but many of my favorite produce is not much more expensive than before inflation started. We switched to egg whites from Costco instead of paying crazy prices for a dozen whole eggs.
            3. Learning how to cook healthy. Spinach, red onions, tomatoes, bagged legumes, whole wheat pasta are all dirt cheap
            • @Guest_User@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Oh sure $25 seems doable without any major losses. But $1 a day for extended periods for an entire family sounds really hard to sustain. But given their reply it seems they have a lot of other food sources they are considering free which makes those numbers make more sense.

              Totally agree meat can be a luxury item although there can be good sales at times. And cooking instead of eating out is a massive money saver!

  • @irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 months ago

    I mean, technically there’s no new tax or anything here, they’re just forcing companies to report the income so people can’t get away with not paying their taxes on the profit. Now if only they’d enforce the tax laws on rich people, they’d easily make way more than this whole scheme will make by targeting a single billionaire.

  • @tryharder@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    I pay my taxes and you should, too. I have no sympathy in general for people not reporting income from PayPal etc, but I’m struggling to think of a less sympathetic subgroup of tax frauds than ticket scalpers. They’re not getting special treatment here, it’s any 1099 income via the payment apps, but I really wish that wasn’t the case. These crooks should be taxed out of business.

    • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Do you even know what the IRS is doing here? They aren’t punishing anyone. This is them literally making sure people pay the proper taxes on the profit.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Wtf! People actually pay top $ for this? Fucking stupid 9-5s !! Just my 2 cent: 9-5 aka regulars are really important for the economy , without them the economy will crash but also 9-5s are not important because paying them living wage or paying them more can actually shift the balance of power.