Dark day for online privacy in the UK.

  • LerajeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    That was the original intent - that sole thing. Stop kids accessing harmful content. It’s now morphed into a legislative tool for mass surveillance.

    • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Citation from a non-biased source badly needed.

      *ends up linking an article that counters nearly everything he said was bad about this bill but then smugly continues on posting as if it didn’t

      Yeah you’re totally grounded in reality and not emotionally invested in this. Carry on, b.

      • LerajeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Read the Bill?

        If you want a brief overview, lawyer and legal author Graham Smith spoke to the BBC about it, all of which was taken from his pocket guide

        Or, The Verge just published a general overview.

        • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The bill…imposes strict requirements on large social platforms to remove illegal content.

          Oh no!

          Additionally, the Online Safety Bill mandates new age-checking measures to prevent underage children from seeing harmful content.

          That’s awful!

          It also pushes large social media platforms to become more transparent about the dangers they pose to children, while also giving parents and kids the ability to report issues online. Potential penalties are also harsh: up to 10 percent of a company’s global annual revenue.

          Won’t somebody think of the corporations!

          the bill could also put encrypted messaging services, like WhatsApp, at risk. Under the terms of the bill, encrypted messaging apps would be obligated to check users’ messages for child sexual abuse material.

          Absolutely disgusting overreach!

          Signal president Meredith Whittaker, meanwhile, issued tentative praise for the ongoing conversation around the bill. “While it’s not everything we wanted, we are more optimistic than we were when we began engaging with the UK government. It matters that the government came out publicly, clearly acknowledging that there is no technology that can safely and privately scan everyone’s communications,” Whittaker said

          Now the president of signal is onboard for some reason?!? They must have been a privacy poser this whole time!

          …… yeah thanks for linking that article, it really cleared things up on the imminent danger policing the internet for the first time with consequences will hold for us all. Jesus Christ, there might be less death, violence, gore, csam, and hate on The Internet for once, absolutely appalling. /MASSIVEFUCKING-S