• birdwing
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fun fact: during the Nuremberg trials it was determined that the “just following orders” excuse was in fact, not valid; and that someone always ought to disobey their superiors when that goes against liberty.

        • birdwing
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you think someone can opt out of responsibility for partaking in repression, then I got bad news for you, yes.

          • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You think soldiers can just ignore lawful orders without severe repercussions? You can sit on your smug high horse when they start beating up innocent civilians.

            • theprogressivist @lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              Yes, they can. I served. You can disobey illegal orders. If you partake, there is no excuse, and you could be charged for being an accessory after the fact.

              • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                You’ve no clue what an illegal order is. Standing around and providing security is not an illegal order. You should know that.

                Listen, I hate the orange shitstain as much as the next guy, but he hasn’t issued an illegal order nor are they following one.

                This is why I can’t stand leftists as much as I can’t stand right-wingers. You’re all so disingenuous and always argue in bad faith, shame on you!

                You’ll end up doing more damage to your movement than any fascist fuck could ever.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Only 177 people were judged in the Nuremberg trials, though. Barely a few dozens executed.

        Vast majority of soldiers and civilians that were “just following orders” were indeed not condemned by their actions. At least not by any judge.

        • birdwing
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Which goes to show it didn’t go as far as it could’ve.

          They might indeed call it unrealistic to actually go on and prosecute all (and reasonably so given that recovery was key), but at least most of the top and key individuals should’ve gotten further consequences. Werner von Braun got off light.

          There’s much the USSR did terribly, but at least it was thorough with its treatment of Nazis after the war. That said, at the end of day, anarchocommunism >>>> state & surveillance capitalism. Stalin still allied with Hitler.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think that’s unfair. Imagine being an impoverished American and one of your only options to afford a college education and healthcare is to join the National Guard, an organization that is rarely activated, and when they are, it’s often to actually help people during things like natural disasters. So you join, you take advantage of the benefits and can actually afford to start a family.

      Then all of the sudden, you’re stuck in this situation. Leaving will get you a dishonorable discharge, stripping you and your family of healthcare. Getting another job will be difficult. Or you can just clench your teeth and maliciously comply by waffling on your responsibilities

      • A_cook_not_a_chef@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think it’s unfair to have troops deployed in Washington DC. They took a gamble by joining and I can empathize with that. But them complying is furthering the fascist agenda.

      • Pofski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because saying no when something isn’t just is the right thing to do.

        People used to have principles that they just would not break, despite the consequences.

        • tacuache@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Its pretty bad. Its like an ominous cloud over the city. You don’t get to see them everywhere but they’re pretty common. The presence of the national guard is meant to be a show of force, so they are located in prominent and visible places.

          However, the National Guard has mostly kept to the sidelines. I’m more concerned about ICE, Park Police and other federal law enforcement running rampant in unmarked cars, wearing masks, and trying to make themselves unaccountable.

          People in DC are definitely talking about it. Many folks elsewhere are dissapointingly quiet

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks! It was really bugging me that I couldn’t place it from that photo, it looks like a dozen different places around d.c./nova from that angle. The only thing that didn’t seem right to me was the roof.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      This deployment was legal for up to 30 days. They can only refuse illegal orders

    • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      What oath? They’re literally just standing around doing nothing. This deployment is legal, the president is allowed to do it for 30 days. After that you might have some legal fuckery to try and get them there illegally but it’s above board for now.

        • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Jesus Christ. Do something about it or STFU. I’m so sick of feckless leftists complaining and complaining and doing nothing about it. Be the change you want to see in the world.

          • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            What part of my statement suggests that I’m not?

            Or are you just complaining about the lack of civilians getting gunned down in the street and want to feel like a tough guy? Maybe take your own advice?

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You mean this oath? The one that swears to obey the orders of the president?

      “I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and of the State of ______ against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to them; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the Governor of ______ and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to law and regulations. So help me God.”

      • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        “According to law and regulations.”

        The president is breaking the oldest law we have. Around deez here parts we call that the constitution, Kyle.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          So are you going to pay for the legal fight they would have and eventually lose? Will you pay their fines, fees and serve their sentence? And pay them when they can’t find a job due to a dishonorable discharge?