• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    “I’m a doctor so I can smack people in the face. It’s not a problem because I will heal them afterwards.”

  • Five@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Behind those numbers is a rapidly changing energy landscape that could lead to a much less carbon-intensive future.

    The word could is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. On paper, China has already built enough PV to power half the country, but uses less than half of their built power. China is building new coal plants, which should be widely reported, but that’s half the story. The other half is acres and acres of dark PV.

    Always look at these propagandistic graphs and check if they’re a report of energy used or things like ‘installed’ and ‘capacity’ – because they’re certainly not using it. China chooses to continue to fuel its industrialization with coal.

    The coal for ‘local control’ angle sounds new and curious. What does it say about their TWs of potential ‘solar capacity’ when they still have blackouts when local private coal plant operators skimp on their coal deliveries? Are they building solar projects in regions where it isn’t needed and leaving regions where it is needed under-supplied due to government incompetence? Are they installing potemkin solar farms that are built with panels that didn’t meet standards for export and will never be reliable? Are they trying to get as much coal out of the ground as they can before other countries force them to stop? I’d be impressed if a journalist could find the answer to these questions.

    Electric vehicle and train increases would be much more inspiring if the former wasn’t the case. It’s much better for the respiratory health of people in city centers, but for the purposes of carbonization, they’re effectively machines that run on coal.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, but with more uncertainty; they’ve definitely stopped the fast increase in emissions and did about 3/4 of all wind and solar installations worldwide last year

  • hypna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    I do not think the world will like a century dominated by the CCP quite so well as it likes rapid decarbonization, but I guess we take what we can get .

    • november@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m not a fan of the CCP either, but maybe other countries should have fucking done something then.

    • Sasha [They/Them]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m doubtful it’ll be any worse than a century dominated by the US, they’re all doing the same evil shit.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      If countries are careful to buy solar modules instead of things like inverters and other grid interconnection hardware with more complex electronics, it’ll limit Chinese power in a way that you can’t limit the ability of an oil or gas supplier to cut you off.

      • hypna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Good advice. I was actually thinking simply about being the center of the global economy and how that typically makes a nation a superpower. Technological espionage is a whole other issue.