stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world · 2 years agoUS rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square121fedilinkarrow-up1351file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldglobalnews@lemmy.ziphackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1351external-linkUS rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney artarstechnica.comstopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square121fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldglobalnews@lemmy.ziphackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squarestevexley@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-22 years agoThat’s only with the artist’s agreement though isn’t it? Usually because you’re paying them. In this case the artist isn’t a person so can’t grant you the copyright (I think)
minus-squareSkyeStarfalllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 years agoYes, in practice this would be a contract with the artist deciding whether the copyright is transferred or not. Because by default, if you commission someone to draw something for you, they keep the copyright.
That’s only with the artist’s agreement though isn’t it? Usually because you’re paying them. In this case the artist isn’t a person so can’t grant you the copyright (I think)
Yes, in practice this would be a contract with the artist deciding whether the copyright is transferred or not.
Because by default, if you commission someone to draw something for you, they keep the copyright.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator