• aport@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think vzq’s point is that you can write good, readable code that doesn’t do what the user wants. Same with other metrics that are ripe for navel-gazing like code coverage.

    It’s bordering on a false dichotomy… but I also believe that dynamic, untyped languages have proven exceptionally useful for rapid prototyping and iteration.

    • vzq
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re setting up a theoretically boogie man that no one said exists and then setup the extreme opposite point of view. You’re annoying the people that are actually sane. You’re being dogmatic in your one views and too extreme.

        • vzq
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

            • vzq
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                That sounds like bad business. No application is 100% unique in everything. Code reuse saves time. If you are unable to bring anything from one app to another, you’re doing it wrong.

                Let me guess though, I was right. You’re a manager not a developer.

                • vzq
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    ? I mentioned it twice. And you sounded like a manager a little bit in one comment, and then a lot in the followup reply to it. To the point it sounded like you were defending it. Making claims that developers aren’t allowed to make the choice you were saying to make. So it was really weird. I don’t even know how your stance makes sense from your point of view.

                    Edit: and thanks for ignoring anything of actual value to reply to.

    • pitbuster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      but I also believe that dynamic, untyped languages have proven exceptionally useful for rapid prototyping and iteration.

      Except that prototypes never end up as just prototypes, they die or become the real app with lots of masking tape.