• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good.

    Australian with three cats here - they’re all indoor and happy about it because i’m not a shitarse pet owner. An outdoor cat in Australia is ecological genocide

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Along with mandatory spay/neuter. Make it a crime to intentionally avoid spaying and neutering cats and dogs.

      Oh, you’re a breeder? I used to work at a no kill animal shelter. You’re the bane of my, and every stray animal’s, existence. FUCK you.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remember folks, adopt, don’t shop. Not only is it just significantly more moral, mutts are far less likely to have health issues from inbreeding that will shorten their lives. You get more time with your four legged loved ones

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, if such a campaign is ever completely successful, along with one for capturing or fixing stray and feral animals, there would need to be some amount of breeding of them or they’d eventually go extinct. Perhaps with regulation on both practices that lead to unnecessary health problems (like inbreeding or breeding for harmful traits like squashed faces) and on numbers to avoid breeding more of a specific sort of animal than there exists demand for.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Maybe add a safeguard to it, so that when local animal shelters are at 10% capacity the regulation is temporarily lifted or something. Realistically, it would never be totally successful anyway.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you confusing ‘breeder’ with ‘pet mill’? Ghetto breeding was horrible to my family involved in animal care and salvation. Actual breeders, though, not so much.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m talking about anyone who intentionally takes an unneutered male animal and an unspayed female animal and intentionally puts them together to make and sell babies. Especially inbreeders. The only purebred animal that I can accept is sheepdogs, because they aren’t bred for looks, they’re bred for intelligence.

      • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Domestic cats have been in the UK for ~2000 years, and wildcats for >~8000 years.

        Their only real predators in the UK are cars and dogs, and most British bird species are well acquainted with cats, and on the whole aren’t at high risk. Recommendations say an outdoor cat is a healthy, happy cat.

        The RSPB (bird conservation charity) doesn’t find them a major problem here, but do recommend:

        1. Neuter them
        2. Keep them in at dawn, dusk & night
        3. If they ever kill a bird, put a bell or beeper on the collar

        Which seems a reasonable set of recommendations.

        On the other hand, the USA and Australia don’t have the thousands of years of history of cats as part of the ecosystem, and they have all these wild dog-type-things and snappy reptile things etc, so the cats are in more danger, and the native bird species are at higher risk. Recommendations say an outdoor cat is a bird-murdering machine that’s about to get run over by a giant SUV and then eaten by drop-bears.

        My Eastern European neighbours think it’s weird that we let the cats inside at all. They think they should live entirely outside.

        So I guess “different countries, different rules”.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          More than countries, different ecosystems different rules. Mainland USA and Hawaii have different ecological rules for good reason.

          • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’ve definitely got big cats (which seem to be named after Mac OS versions), though I’m not sure if they have smaller wildcats which occupy the same ecological position as domestic cats.

      • c0m47053@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        From a UK perspective, it seems unbelievably cruel to keep a cat locked indoors. The hunting instinct is one of a cat’s main drives, so to take that away is equivalent to removing sleep or food. I understand the issues around cats and wildlife in other countries, but I think the solution is to just not have domestic cats rather than trying to imprison them.

          • c0m47053@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it depends where you live. Here in the UK, cats have no predators, and bird populations have survived predation by cats for thousands of years, cats mostly pick off the weakest examples. Maybe there are regions of the us where cats are not problematic as outdoor pets, I don’t know for sure. I’m fond of my “furry killer” too, and occasionally she does take out a bird or small rodent, but I see it as part of the natural order.

            • Alto@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think it depends where you live.

              This is the key. Just because it works in the UK does not mean it does elsewhere. There are plenty of places where cats are essentially very dangerous invasive species and are wrecking absolute havoc on the wildlife populations. This includes the majority of North America.

    • napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not everywhere are cats a problem.

      They are literally native to Africa and parts of Asia. In most of Europe they have been held for thousands of years and are not a threat to the ecosystems.

      Taking Countries with invasive species as a global role model makes no sense.

  • mathematicalMagpie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s crazy how it’s seen as socially acceptable to “adopt” or “rescue” them and then release them to freely roam your neighbourhood as an invasive species.

      • vivavideri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are a handful of kitties in our neighborhood and fuck, they make me so nervous any time they’re even remotely close to the road. As far as I know they’re all housed, and the lady a few doors down to me said, “just tell him to go home and he will!” If I see him on the wrong side of the road I pick his ass up and put him back in his yard.

        My cats stay inside. We’ve let them out on the deck (supervised) but the rule is if one single toe bean leaves the deck, it’s inside time.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both domesticated and feral cats — like the one pictured above in New York — pose a threat to Australia’s biodiversity, experts say.

    I know what they meant by this, but I still find it amusing that a cat in New York could pose a threat to Australia’s biodiversity.

  • Rhaedas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    *cat owners

    And I’m not sure how a curfew is going to work since that relies on cats to give one ounce of shit.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Australian farmers have, unfortunately, had to find certain methods of enforcing curfews on cats. Keep 'em inside, folks.

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Partially. It also relies on the cat listening to the owner when they try to get them inside. Some cats will, but most come when they feel like it. “Like herding cats” has its meaning for a reason.

        Pets in general shouldn’t be allowed to roam freely outside. There’s too many dangers to them and things they can do to cause problems.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Simple, cats that are outside past X o’clock get taken to the RSPCA and they’re put up for adoption after a week without being claimed.

  • jcit878@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Australian cat owner here. owners that aren’t responsillble enough to keep their cats inside are deadset dickheads. the most my cat sees of the outside is our backyard when I take her for a walk either leashed up or in my arms, and even then her killer instinct is so obvious as she tracks lizards lying in the garden and such. cats are born hunters. keep them inside

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      American cat-directed can opener here: re outdoor cats - we have so many of the same dickheads here. We have coyotes on a nearby trail that eat cats all the time, you’d think their owners would care enough to keep them indoors but no such luck.

      My cat has taken the time to break me in, he’s not going to want to train a new can opener and is happy at home indoors.

  • plant_based_monero@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im so mad with people not willing to put down feral cats, the live of a single cat is worth more than the live of the hundreds of wild animals that it will kill in its lifetime? Fucking not, but some people are delusional and only think in the cute cat pics. They say ignorance is bliss

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I definitely think one pet is worth hundreds of wild animals. I even believe that one pet’s happiness is worth the lives of hundreds of wild animals.

      Edit:

      Buy biodiversity is more important than the happiness of all those pets. Something should be done if this is a real threat to the ecosystem.

  • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see so many missing cat flyers around my neighbourhood it’s depressing, and yet people keep letting their cats outside. It’s bad from just about every angle I don’t understand why people keep doing it.

  • boomhauer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m one of those dickhead cat owners who seemingly can’t keep their cat inside. We adopted our cat when he was 3 after spending a lot of time on the street, and ever since taking him in, he’d constantly howl to be let outside. We tried a few methods like an outdoor cat run, but nothing seemed to work.

    We’ve got a GPS collar (and bell) on him and he seems to just stay super local, like within 100 metres of our house.

    We’ve started to gradually transition him inside more but it’s tough. We know it’s a problem, but really need help getting him to accept inside life.

    • dlok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Growing up we always had outdoor cats and my first cat was outdoors and the more I learned that wasn’t great I tried to transition inside after moving house, I figured it would work best alongside of change of scenery and like you described she just howled at the door constantly and stared out of the window… I gave up after 6 months.

      She is ok with being in at night though so at least there’s that.

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Howling cats get the water gun. Spray bottle also works. You’ll feel terrible but it works.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    At the very least neutering should be mandatory and strict controls on where cats can be purchased to prevent breeding farms and suchlike.

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, cats are not innocent, but let’s keep pretending that humans aren’t affecting biodiversity and just blame the cats. Australians are among the worst offenders on biodiversity problems and climate change, so don’t worry… I get it.

    • 768@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you saying, that, because a human curfew would be out of proportion, a cat curfew is out of proportion, too?

      Human petship is by extension human activity, so curbing anthropogenic influence on biodiversity loss might include blaming human pets and thus cats, when those pets contribute significantly (2B animals/a) to biodiversity loss.

      Domesticated cats live long, are well fed and are great hunters.

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the first step is to identify the full impact of Glysophates and other similarly used pesticides, particularly their roll up impacts, then we can start working on secondary effects like cats.

        If you take away the cats, rats and mice will destroy 10x more than cats ever could. See Vancouver BC or Easter Island.

          • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            People can get crazy defensive about this stuff, and the goal posts almost always move.

            First, they usually try to say that it’s cruel to keep fluffy inside. (Cats haven’t evolved to safely fit in MOST environments, let’s be real. There’s a whole damned planet out there.)

            If you mention environmental concerns, they’ll usually suggest of a bell or collar. (Both can be very deadly to a cat if the collar or bell catches on something. Break-away collars mean absolutely nothing if the clasp istelf catches on something, so they also aren’t a safety guarantee.)

            Usually, that bit is also followed by pointing out that everything is contributing to species becoming extinct.

            Sometimes, I seriously wonder if some people are just trying to get out of exercising their cat. I really hope not though, because that’s a horrific thought.

            The thought of potentially shortening my cats lifespan is heart breaking. I would never willingly do that to a creature who relies on me like that, so I can’t understand this. I’m not sure I ever will.

          • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes. But we need to stop smoking, not just chew some gum to mask the problem.

            Without handling the pesticide/herbicide part of the equation, you’re not handling the actual problem. You’re treating a symptom.

            All of these disorders and problems existed before. Colony collapse disorder existed before. Bats and their white nose fungus have existed for untold millenia. Songbirds had to face housecats for hundreds of years, just in North America.

            So why are we seeing a sudden and massive change to all of those things. Cats aren’t suddenly more effective hunters because of climate change. Colony collapse disorder has no logical reason to be affected by climate change as weather has been ruled out as a cause of it.

            It’s not like they’re Fire Ants who are migrating northward as winters lessen in severity, or the massive pine beetle epidemic of BC which happened because it stopped getting cold enough to freeze them to death.

            For Bats bees, and songbirds, what do they have in common. Bats eats bugs, songbirds eat bugs and seeds. Bugs can be easily found around crops. Seeds are most common around crops. Honeybees pollinate pesticide/herbicide coated crops.

            Hell, the biggest and most glaring thing pointing at pest/herb-icides is that barn swallow almost went extinct but tree swallows were fine. Weird how the bug eating, farm dwelling songbird very nearly died off but the forest dwelling cousin is fine.

            • Jolan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Barn shallows are one of the most populous birds on the planet. When did they nearly go extinct??

              • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Canada is the only country that has actually tracked their numbers in detail and has a recorded 75% loss in the last 25 years.

                Everywhere else is estimating a 30% loss, but they can’t provide studies backing up that limited loss.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You realise your barn swallow example is the most widespread swallow in the world and has a conservation status of “least concerning”?

              Cats killing wild animals isn’t a “symptom”, it’s a “disease”, just like some of the other “diseases” you point out. Right now you’re telling us we shouldn’t try to treat the “disease” that’s the easiest to take care of because there are other “diseases” that are harder to take care of that exist.

              They’re not suddenly more effective at killing, we just suddenly realize how much of an issue they are.

              House cats are very effective predators that aren’t native to the vast majority of the world and we are the ones who introduced them everywhere and decided to let them roam free. Time to face our responsibilities.

              It also lowers their lifespan and makes them catch diseases that they then transmit to humans.

              https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2380

              https://onehealth.uoguelph.ca/2022/02/28/outdoor-cats-a-threat-to-more-than-just-birds/

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_predation_on_wildlife

              • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                https://naturecanada.ca/discover-nature/endangered-species/barn-swallow/

                Nature Canada, lists three suspected main causes for the 75% drop in barn swallow numbers.

                1. The precipitous drop in insect numbers. Which is pesticides.
                2. They don’t build nests in “modern” barn structures. Notably, newer barns means newer pesticides and herbicides as well.
                3. Climate change screwing up their migrations.

                Funny how two of the three involve pesticides.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s one type of bird that is globally in the “least concerned” category and that lives in an environment where the concentration of cats per km is very low.

                  Is the barn swallow and the impact of cats in rural locations really the way you want to go about arguing against scientific studies on the impact of cat populations on wildlife in general? That’s the hill you want to die on?

                  I know it’s hard to admit we’re wrong but you can also just stop replying so you stop digging your hole.

      • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am suggesting no such thing? What I mean is that humans should start doing other things first, clean up their own shit - first reason that there are so few birds is factory farming - overly aggressive use of pesticides killing off insects, machine harvesting chopping up ground nests, land “purchase” destroying forests and animal trek transit zones. Outdoor cats come only in sight because of the one animal kind that does thrive on this: rodents, especially mice.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If cats want to be able to get away with killing native wildlife, they’ve just got to start a mining or logging company and they’re all set.