Chinese “kill switches” have been found hidden in American solar farms, prompting calls for Ed Miliband to halt the rollout of renewables.

On Thursday, the Energy Secretary was urged to impose an “immediate pause” on his green energy blitz to review whether UK solar plants are also at risk.

The components found in the US included cellular radios capable of switching off the equipment remotely, raising serious concerns about grid security, according to Reuters.

They were found inside power inverters manufactured by unnamed Chinese companies.

Power inverters are the key links between solar or wind farms and the rest of the power system, converting their electricity so the wider grid can use it.

One source told Reuters that compromising such equipment would give Beijing the ability to inflict blackouts on the West, claiming it would create “a built-in way to physically destroy the grid”.

  • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 小时前

    Okay, so there apparently seems to be a type of information warfare happening. Where we as consumers are finding security holes in all sorts of important infrastructure which every major supplier seems to be allowing government level access to Cell towers, PBX systems, L3 backbone internet, power generation and delivery including solar inverters. Huawei got caught up in it a couple years ago and before that Cisco, now with more evidence mounting from the pagers in Lebanon and Palestine a couple months ago.

  • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 天前

    OP, I wish you would stop spreading rumors. As others have pointed out, there’s no real evidence these allegations are credible.

    For more context, nearly all modern solar equipment and energy storage devices (like Tesla Powerwalls) come with cellular equipment for firmware updates and production monitoring when there isn’t a better connection available. It’s just how it’s done nowadays, it’s not inherentely nefarious.

    Now for some critical thinking. What does China really gain from taking out PV power sources? Those power sources are only producing power less than half the time people need it. Wouldn’t it be better to attack the 24/7 baseload power producers like a gas powerplant? If you take out the PV that gas plant will compensate, just like it does when it’s cloudy. For this reason there’s little point to attacking the auxillary, intermittent power sources.

    • Shacktastic@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 小时前

      Such capability would be a source of immense geopolitical power, though it makes more sense for leveraging consessions out of small debtor nations like all the African and South American ones that China is investing infrastructure into. Kinda tricky to use though.

      • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 小时前

        I don’t think so, since once revealed the capability can be easily removed or mitigated.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      The “theory” is that they’d shut off multiple big solar farms during peak, to damage the grid. But it’s literally just propaganda.


      The personal-use solar inverters that let you check power generation from your phone, let you turn them off from your phone as well. And some people and groups have tried to shift that narrative to “ermegerd remote killswitches in industrial scale inverters”. But those aren’t hooked up to the internet and they’re usually in grounded metal boxes. You can’t easily get an outside signal to them.

  • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 天前

    From the original Reuters article linked in another comment

    “Reuters was unable to determine how many solar power inverters and batteries they have looked at.”

    “Both (sources) declined to be named”

    “The two people declined to name the Chinese manufacturers of the inverters and batteries with extra communication devices, nor say how many they had found in total.”

    “The existence of the rogue devices has not previously been reported. The U.S. government has not publicly acknowledged the discoveries.”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 天前

      And then we told them… gasp chuckle… that there was a Chinese kill-switch… churtle guffaw in the solar panels!

      So now… heaving laugh-sigh they have to buy more… hiccup-laugh natural gas from the United States!

  • kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 天前

    This is a certified journalism moment, making grand claims with nothing but hot air to back it up. Oh well, anything to complain about the Chinese.

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 天前

    So… don’t connect the suspect inverters to the internet? It’s not like they have a magical sattelite link that can’t be blocked…

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 天前

      Not an option. They have to be connected to something, the grid has to be able to monitor and coordinate power plants of any kind remotely and for a solar power plant the inverters are where a lot of that logic happens. Obviously it’s not going to have a public IP accessible to the whole internet, it may not even be connecting across the public internet at all but at the very least there are data collection and monitoring networks woven throughout the entire country and there are all sorts of ways anyone with nation-state level resources, nevermind China who manufactures and supplies so much of the world’s technology, might gain access to them.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 天前

    Almost all cars and products have call home features in them these days. Car companies are putting kill switches in to stop delinquent purchasers. The trick is to manage them rather than whinge about them. If you know they are there then manage the network and environment to limit the risk.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      If you know they are there then manage the network and environment to limit the risk.

      What’s being discussed here are undocumented network connections that were wired to the primary controls through a secondary data bus so that standard monitoring tools wouldn’t see the traffic.

      Even if it isn’t malicious it’s terrible, no-good, shitty design work.

      https://cybersecuritynews.com/u-s-officials-investigating-rogue-communication-devices/

    • Yeah, the one in my car was on the old AT&T GSM network. I’m pretty sure there’s no network left for it to talk to, but I’d still like to find the component and wrap it in aluminum foil. The car’s been paid off for 6 years, and OTA services cut off a couple years after that. There’s no legitimate (from my perspective) reason for anyone but me to be able to talk to my car.

  • Disaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 天前

    Are there any interesting teardowns of a compromised inverter out there (that isn’t some horribly annoying talking head on youtube) ?

    • meyotch@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 天前

      I’m calling shenanigans on the reports until they name some names.

      I wouldn’t put it past any government to do such things, but drastic action like halting the rollout of solar demands some serious proof. I also wouldn’t put it past any government to just make stuff up to further their agenda.

      In the case of this administration, Don’t Trust, Do Verify.

      If you find such a tear down, I would love to know. But I think it wise to remain sceptical without solid proof.