• skyler@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    To the several people who reported this post:

    This community does not have a ban on AI generated images. Especially ones as silly and harmless as this.

    Should a user abuse AI generated images, such as spamming them, then action will be taken against them. But one-off silly images like this are fine.

    • gurnu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This take is this community’s equivalent to the sole c/dogs mod (who very recently took over) banning people for putting up facts about pitbulls: pitiful

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There are ethical concerns with the use of AI, especially image generation.

      c/dogs has a strict no AI policy, and it seems to be appreciated by our users.

    • StarlightDust
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      This decision should be reconsidered and I would downvote if my instance allowed. Almost every comment is against it here.

      • skyler@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I prefer to allow posts with controversial subjects that don’t otherwise violate any rules, such as AI generated images, because it allows for important conversations.

        I would rather allow the occasional AI image be posted so that people can discuss why AI images are bad.

          • skyler@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            There isn’t anything wrong with a comment section discussing a subject related to the post even if that subject isn’t what the community is about.

            If someone posted a picture of a cat-shaped pizza then it’d be fine for that post’s commenters to discuss pizza in general.

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The people in this thread that ignore valid reasons for disdain towards AI are exhausting. “Just let me lol at thing and move on.” Me, I miss the days of even just drawing a meme up in MS Paint. I don’t want this Uncanny Valley dog shit. It’s not actual intelligence, it exists solely because of theft, and it’s ruining the environment.

      • tauren@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t worry about that. Some people just made AI-hate their whole personality. They take pride in fact that they don’t understand these new tools and can’t use them. That’s a relatively new trend, but it’ll pass.

        • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          16 hours ago

          At least those people have a personality…

          Are you implying that people who don’t like AI are akin to Luddites?

          I just don’t like AI art.

          That idea of that post is really cute, someone could have illustrated that and it could have been lush.

          AI art is just an updated version of airbrush art you’d find on the rides at a fairground - it’s tacky.

        • Bezier@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I just want “real” posts with human thought and intent behind them. Because what’s even the point of a social media of machine-generated content? The more you outsource to the machine, the less real it becomes. AI images look like shit as well, but that may eventually pass.

          In this case, the captions are written too well to be designed by the statistics machine. So maybe it deserves less flak than for example that one slop comic a bit ago where the AI gave a glass of water a speech bubble. The hierarchy lines are still clearly hallucinated by the AI and not designed by a human.

          can’t use them

          Flipping this around so that it’s the AI bros who are doing something novel that others can’t is some galaxy-brained mental gymnastics gaslight move. Fucking anyone can ask the image generator to generate an image.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Lol, because it’s so hard

          I hate AI because its stans are so fucking delusional I sometimes wonder if that’s the actual point of it.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Some people just made AI-hate their whole personality.

          It’s being used to replace human workers by the exploitative wealthy, and it’s actively destroying the environment we live in. If you are not against “AI” (that is, generative machine learning models - there’s no intelligence involved) then you are colluding with the robber barons.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              Unless you are training your models at home on your own private server, the current generation of ML models are dependent on the capitalist corporate model. They are trained on large datasets collected by corporate surveillance using server farms owned and operated by corporations, by developers paid by those corporations.

              The capitalism and the “AI” are inextricably linked. If you use any of their apps you are patronizing them.

          • tauren@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            How many human workers lost their jobs because of this meme?

            Here is the answer for self-assessment:

            spoiler

            zero

            • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It normalizes the use of genAI for even more things.

              Today it’s just shitposts, where quality isn’t important.

              Tomorrow it’ll be one off projects that their creator really wanted to be out, so quality won’t be important.

              After tomorrow, it’ll be small group efforts becoming “solo endeavours” with lower quality artwork.

              After that, it’ll be corporations within the creative fields that really want to lay off their workforce, even if it means lower quality work, because they can make up with the lower production costs and higher quantity.

              And one day, we will wake up to a reality, where everything is AI generated slop, and we won’t be the “idea guys”, who write the prompts for them.


              If you ask: not all other technologies were all good either. Cars made us dependent on them, forever restructuring our cities, atomizing our communities. Hell, some of the tools that made creative endeavors, such as home recording and easy to use game engines caused “the bedroom djent kid” and “fetishization of solo indie devs” problems respectively.

              • tauren@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 minutes ago

                That reminds me of Putin’s argument on why a person who threw a plastic drinking glass at a policeman was arrested: “Today they throw plastic drinking glasses, tomorrow they’ll start throwing molotovs, then - killing people.”

                • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  32 seconds ago

                  The irony in this is that autocrats really love generative AI, especially when it is used to dismantle democracy.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Uh huh, and how many graphic artists lost their jobs because of this model (and others like it) being sold to companies as a way to produce marketing material without paying an artist?

              And how many unnecessary pounds of carbon were pumped into the atmosphere because of this meme?

              • tauren@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                This post is bad and deserves 20 “ai slop” comments because somebody did something else somewhere else using a similar tool? Is that what you think?

                • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  You either object to the acceleration of exploitation and environmental destruction and refuse to participate in it, or you are a collaborator.

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have no issue with using AI in research and problem solving where it actually exceeds humans. For meme making, OP could have at least made sure it draws an actual hierarchy instead of every node connected to every other node. Or at least fix it in Paint afterwards.

          More importantly, let’s stop calling LLMs AI.

  • StarlightDust
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This wouldn’t have taken much time or skill to make in GIMP or Krita.