• Wilker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        a grossly oversimplied suggestion i would have is 10% of the income, starting from a 10 million USD/month income, up 15 percentual points for each order of magnitude, so 25% if someone gets 100m/mo, 55% if 10b/mo, 70% if 100b/mo etc.

        assuming all these people properly pays accurately, that would be about enough to feed people in and out of school.

        • thebrownhaze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think your books will balance. There are not enough billionaires to find this. Also, they will all disappear, I bet they have good lawyers.

          And I bet if implemented that threshold would come down and down and down. Let’s talk to a prosperous Ukrainian farmer in the interwar period. Sent to a goo-lag for having a sewing machine perhaps?

          • Wilker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            i smell double bind. say nothing and the food is taken away, with parents being forced to spit up more money for food. say something and rich people will be sad, which means no money added to pay for food, which will be used to justify taking away the food anyway.

            what’s your solution then? you may not need the government to pay for your kids’ food, but there are people who still needs it. you gotta feed people somehow and be careful not to fall into ableist policy (e.g only people who quote unquote, “works hard”, gets the food).

            • thebrownhaze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Provide it free to anyone who wants it, not means tested. They just have to apply, which will be easy to do via the school.

              I’m sure a bunch of less needy will apply, but at the state level, this will save millions

              • Wilker
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                pretty sure the labor of validating all the applications, surveyling who does and does not get the food, and pushing for the othering of people who have applications as well as those who doesn’t but still get the food, is gonna cost more than the actual food, being mostly transportation, cooking and cleaning.

                • thebrownhaze@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Governments operations are wasteful, I agree. I bet if we sat down together, we could come up with a good system in half a day.

                  • Wilker
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    may as well be a culture shock that the idea of restricting food access to people is in any way appealing to you at all.