• Wilker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i smell double bind. say nothing and the food is taken away, with parents being forced to spit up more money for food. say something and rich people will be sad, which means no money added to pay for food, which will be used to justify taking away the food anyway.

    what’s your solution then? you may not need the government to pay for your kids’ food, but there are people who still needs it. you gotta feed people somehow and be careful not to fall into ableist policy (e.g only people who quote unquote, “works hard”, gets the food).

    • thebrownhaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Provide it free to anyone who wants it, not means tested. They just have to apply, which will be easy to do via the school.

      I’m sure a bunch of less needy will apply, but at the state level, this will save millions

      • Wilker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        pretty sure the labor of validating all the applications, surveyling who does and does not get the food, and pushing for the othering of people who have applications as well as those who doesn’t but still get the food, is gonna cost more than the actual food, being mostly transportation, cooking and cleaning.

        • thebrownhaze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Governments operations are wasteful, I agree. I bet if we sat down together, we could come up with a good system in half a day.

          • Wilker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            may as well be a culture shock that the idea of restricting food access to people is in any way appealing to you at all.