In my anecdotal experience which is of course the most solid and accurate (/s) people I’ve talked to within my circles do care just not enough to do anything. Pretty much along the lines, “of AI, weird, anyways”
Consequently, this study suggests that using the term “Artificial Intelligence” in marketing campaigns and product descriptions may negatively impact consumer demand.
Hate to tell you but you’re the only one thinking that. The average consumer could not care less.
That’s hyperbole. Perhaps the majority of consumers don’t care, but some do.
It’s not hyperbole. I said “the average consumer”, not “all consumers”.
Probably referring to “you’re the only one thinking that.” There’s at least two of us :p
But yeah, probably not most
At least three
Oh. In that case, yes.
In my anecdotal experience which is of course the most solid and accurate (/s) people I’ve talked to within my circles do care just not enough to do anything. Pretty much along the lines, “of AI, weird, anyways”
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19368623.2024.2368040
Don’t know what that link is but it’s staying blue unless you want to tell me what’s behind it.
It is a link to an academic journal.
The OP is not about using AI terminology in marketing campaigns, it’s about using AI imagery.
Why is that a good argument? The comic doesn’t say “all people will think like this” or even imply it.