• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    That has no additional information. I’m not saying the story is made up. Just that it leaves out a lot of important details about what exact mechanism was used to “force” her.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s speculation. They seem like reasonable possibilities, but we don’t know because it wasn’t explained.
        At worse, all that is coercion. Well mostly just natural consequences really. Still not force.

        People can absolutely be forced to eat or drink. It’s been done in the past, when inmates go on a hunger strike. Half a dozen people strap them down, force a feeding tube down their throats. If lucky, they’d be sedated first.

        • FlowVoid@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They aren’t reasonable possibilities, because Medicare covers everyone over 65 regardless of their medical history and ACA health insurance plans are required to enroll all applicants regardless of age or medical history.

          The latter can raise your premium if you smoke tobacco. That’s literally the only power of “coercion” they have available. All your other choices are off-limits.

      • FlowVoid@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the US, you can’t lose your health insurance based on your medical history.

        Pretty much the only way for an individual to lose their health insurance is by leaving their employer, if they have employer-provided insurance.

        Non-employer-provided plans are required to enroll anyone who wants enroll.