• ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, he said: “Is it where the money comes from? The script, the director, the talent, where it was shot?”

    These are the important questions to asking. I imagine there won’t be strict definitions of “US made” films instead it will be a “vibes” based criteria used to punish people who go against the Trump Administration’s policies.

    • reptar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s another control gate on the economy that he can manipulate. He is basically finding ways to insert himself in his amounts of commerce. It’s a trump tax via bribes

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    How would that even work? At what point do you charge the tariff?

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s a good question. Everything is digital nowadays, so it’s not like we’re getting film reels from Bollywood.

      If I had to wager a guess, the cinemas would probably be paying the tariff at the time of acquiring the license to show the film.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I think this is good. It will help local (outside the US) artistic industries space to flourish without being threatened by Hollywood.

    Movies all over the world face inmence pressure form competing from Hollywood, buy without that pressure, they could focus on their local strengths instead.

    Yeah USians are probably fucked though, but it’s kinda bad to feel bad for the facists and their enablers.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      i don’t really see how… it’ll make movies from outside the US more expensive inside the US, but it doesn’t effect the price of US movies elsewhere

      … without retaliation from many other countries of course, but idk if that’ll happen really: europe has kinda gone with retaliating in other areas: specific to applying pressure rather than broad

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        International movie makers will stop trying to appease Hollywood because they know that it’s very unlikely their movies will play in the US. So they will focus on other international markets. It’s the same thing we saw with the other tariffs, right? Buyers and sellers are going to look for new business deals in every other country in the world because it makes more sense than dealing with a lunatic who were randomly impose and erase tariffs.

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I was under the impression that they film a great deal of movies in Canada because it costs far less than filming anywhere else. We also have places that look very modern while maintaining very gothic cities and all of the land in between that could be filmed to look like many places abroad. So he’s costing the film industry the savings that they have gotten used to by filming in Canada. Art of the deal.

    • bmancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Tons of Hollywood films are shot in Hungary! Dune being one of them, but there’s many many more. Cheap extras, cheap studio space and VFX industry.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Apart from the point that this would be illegal (he won’t know or care, but it is), imagine other countries responding in kind? At least our country imports more media from the US than we produce on our own. And the return tarrifs costs and losses caused by that would also hit primarily US companies like Netflix, Disney, Amazon, AplleTV…

  • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Ok? This is current year, I can just use a VPN to stream foreign movies.

    I am so tired of all the BS this regime keeps throwing at everything.

  • Dzso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As a dual US and EU citizen, good!* European movies are better than that Hollywood shit anyway.

    *for the record, neither this nor anything else Trump is doing is actually good.

  • klu9@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which will result in retaliation against US movies, thus further undermining the US’s unparalleled soft power.

    This man is doing literally everything Putin could ever want.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The US being by far the biggest exporter of movies, the only way this makes sense is that Trump is not seeing enough ass-kissing (and bribes campaign donations) from the US movie industry, so he’s actively trying to damage them.

    Claim foreign movies are a threat, wait for other countries to retaliate against US movies, sit back and watch bribes sales of $TRUMP grow as the major studios seek his political favor.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I mean at least this is one of the situations where at its base a tariff makes sense in an industry protectionist way. Its not like putting insane tariffs on goods we dont even manufacture here whatsoever, which is just stupid.

      That said, a 100% tariff is just mind bogglingly stupid dick-swinging in this already hostile trade environment. It would make more sense if it was like 5%. Not something that will make the world boycott our media

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Actually this doesn’t protect the industry in any way. It’s an extreme threat to American movies, music, and tech. So far, other countries have not been taxing the US on those three classes of items and services, but if they do, it will destroy Apple and Google and Microsoft and Hollywood in a matter of months.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I mean at least this is one of the situations where at its base a tariff makes sense in an industry protectionist way

        Except for the fact that - under no circumstances - do you need tariffs to protect a wildly successful industry. That makes no sense because there’s nothing to protect against. It can literally only do harm.

  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 day ago

    Movies and TV shows are the US’s cultural export. It helps keep us front of mind. They are essentially asking for retaliation where the US is erased from all foreign screens.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As a non American, that kind of sounds like a good thing tbh. US cultural exportation is why the MAGA right is popping up all over the west

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It might be a “good” thing, but it is an incredibly stupid thing for a US president to cause, that is unless they’re trying to undermine the power of the US.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I mean, I would think it’s the billionaire financiers that are directly funding the right, but the movies probably don’t help.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Another “Trump said” that should be ignored.

    How would this even work? Tariffs function by holding the physical items in customs, until the tax is paid. But a licensing deal on a digital good, that can be transfered undetected over the internet, is impossible to teriff. You could tax it other ways, but 100% of what. The distribution license? The copyright?

    I guarantee he hasn’t thought about any of this, and as such this mindless utterance a can be safely ignored.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m not sure what logistical hurdle you think cannot be overcome here. All he needs to do is find some stage in the game where any vendor in the United States is required to disclose and pay a tax on whatever is specifically identified as the targeted item. You don’t need to hold the things in customs to do that. We already have tons of taxes that depend partly on the tax filer being honest. And of course they can always be audited later.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      The more logical choice would be to tax the distribution license sold by non American entities.

      The thing that makes this unenforceable is that what he means is that he wants to tax movies not filmed fully in the US even if they are American movies.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Sure I’ll accept I got all the details wrong. That doesn’t really matter to my point.
        My point is that this is another example of him saying something so stupid, that it shouldn’t get any media coverage.

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sure I’ll accept I got all the details wrong. That doesn’t really matter to my point.

          This made me chuckle.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Point taken, but this isn’t just a “covfefe moment” though. This is newsworthy because Trump just obliterated half of all money in Hollywood. Gone, reduced to atoms.

          Culture is one of the main things that the US exports across the world, and this puts a big old smoking hole in our feet in that regard. This will have tangible repercussions.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            This is newsworthy because Trump just obliterated half of all money in Hollywood.

            Did he? I thought this was something he just said. Did he sign an executive order or take any action to make it happen?

            He says shit all the time, and actually tries to do less than 5% of it.