• Piecemakers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The food that animals eat from “calories we grow” is not very rarely hand-picked, and so your statement is not relevant in this example, nor helpful in answering my question.

    • SkyeStarfall
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most food is harvested by machines

      The point is that less animals = less food needed. And less people need to grow food

      And if some people still need to hand harvest food, well, then that’s not an engineering problem, but a political one. And either way irrelevant to your statement, because it was then never about the food needed anyway.

      • Piecemakers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How very convenient for your argument. Typical vegan. Fuck, this whole thread is juvenile. This species is doomed. 😘