• DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sorry, but these bills are basically useless. The parking “reform” doesn’t eliminate parking mandates, just puts a very large cap on how much cities can still require. Calling SB5184 a “nation-leading” bill is ridiculous when other cities, such as San Jose and Austin, did away with parking minimums altogether. And the TOD bill merely requires some very minor upzoning in the next general plan update – which will not be for decades for many cities.

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I wouldn’t say that those bills are anti-car, or anti- at all, since they authorize and promote new things instead of banning anything. I’d say that they’re “pro-people”.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Conflicted on the lot splitting. It was cool that 4 unattached houses could fit into the footprint of one victorian, but… Nobody has a yard.

    Whatever, it’s needed.

    • yessikg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They can have a community garden instead

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      What’s the point of having your house be unattached if you’re not going to have a green space? Even a shared one.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I dunno. I think some houses have roof gardens, but that doesn’t seem like enough. Luckily Seattle has a lot of parks and is surrounded by real, lush wilderness.