• JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How would business work? Currently a business’s purpose by law is to make money. How would you enforce a different goal without going full centralized economy?

    And how is trying to add less value more effective than internalizing externalized costs? For example, co2 is an externalized cost, one companies don’t need to pay for right now, it’s external to them. If we made them pay for it to fund carbon capture at 1 ton removed for every 1 ton emitted, they would decrease their emissions and the rest would be removed. You could do something similar for other ecological issues as well. What’s the benefit of degroth over internalizing costs?

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was confusing an obligation to shareholders with an obligation to profit. So if a share holder majority want maximized profit, I think the company needs to do it.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            But the shareholders can replace members who are not acting what they perceive to be their best interest, right? It seems like eventually the company will conform to what the share holders want.

            It seems like if a CEO publicly said they were shrinking the company to benefit the environment, they’d be replaced by the shareholders pretty quickly.

        • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Easy, just get society to treat those people for what they are… Greedy selfish inhumane criminals. I mean they usually share the same tactics as criminals so it’s not even a joke. Treat em for what they are… Life rapists.

          Treat em like they got rabies.

          It’s our duty as human beings.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hmm interesting. Thank you!

        They do have an obligation to what their share holders want though don’t they?

        • witten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe part of degrowth would be fewer public companies beholden to shareholders.

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                In co-ops the employees have a controlling interest, right? So a majority of them would still need to want to shrink the company. That might be easier to convince them than investors though.

                • TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  True, it would still need to be based off the cooperative ideas. There was an awesome forestry co-op in the 70-90’s called the Hoedad’s that had an interesting model and had each section ran as separate crews with even different pay structures and even philosophical structures. They did tree replanting and brush cutting and many other activities but each sub group bid contacts independently but we’re part of the workers cooperative collectively.

        • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the shareholders want the corporation to blatantly violate the law, they don’t do that. They don’t have to do everything that shareholders want. Shareholders are perfectly free to sell their shares, if they don’t like what a company is doing, or to vote out members of the board, if they don’t like the way the company is being managed. The idea that corporations have no other choice is a myth perpetuated to maintain the status quo