• Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It occurs to me the CoS doesn’t need a state law preventing outside sources from repairing their gizmos. An intra-church policy will do just fine.

    Similarly the Catholic Church doesnt need to impose a state law against third parties making Uriel’s®️ Heavy Duty Double-Divine Holy Water for demon hunting and exorcism when an internal ruling will do as well. The same for Uriel’s Fastin-EZ quick-transubstantiation communion wafers (available also in chocolate, mint and sweetcream flavors!).

    • ours@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a group offering CoS-equivalent services free of charge as a bit of a challenge to it (CoS Lite, CoS Methadone). They do so by acquiring these devices second-hand and I guess maintaining them is needed and the CoS wants to limit their impact by limiting their right to repair the devices.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Zone_(Scientology)

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah so it is, much like the matters with Apple and John Deere, a misuse of IP law. Right to repair serves the public. Giving the CoS even a religious monopoly on e-meter testing does not.